Abstract
Many voters know little about their MPs, so we would not expect many constituents to have known whether their MP was involved in the expenses scandal or not. Yet, we show evidence from the British Election Study (BES) internet panel that, in general, voters’ perceptions of their MP’s behaviour did correspond, at least somewhat, to their actual involvement in the scandal. Nevertheless, it is also the case that almost half of voters did not know whether their MP was involved in the scandal, and perceptions were also biased by political predispositions. Moreover, voters did not punish their MPs for their perceived misconduct: the link between perceptions and vote choice was weak compared to that between publicly available information and perceptions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Nick Vivyan, Markus Wagner and Jessica Tarlov
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vivyan, N., Wagner, M., Tarlov, J. (2014). Where Did Electoral Accountability Fail? MP Misconduct, Constituent Perceptions and Vote Choice. In: vanHeerde-Hudson, J. (eds) The Political Costs of the 2009 British MPs’ Expenses Scandal. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034557_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034557_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44188-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03455-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)