Abstract
In total, 149 MPs stood down before the 2010 general election, but to what extent was the expenses scandal a factor in MPs’ decisions to retire or voluntarily exit the House of Commons? This chapter adopts Jacobson and Kernell’s (1983) strategic politicians hypothesis, arguing that, similar to the US banking scandal, British MPs acted strategically, taking advantage of available information in decisions relating to their electoral prospects. The evidence here suggests that the expenses scandal was a factor in MPs’ decisions to stand down. It did not, however, have the impact many suspected given the intense media scrutiny and public outrage following the Daily Telegraph’s initial revelations: more mundane and less controversial factors such as age and seniority played a bigger role.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Jennifer vanHeerde-Hudson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
vanHeerde-Hudson, J. (2014). Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Impact of the Expenses Scandal on MPs’ Decisions to Stand Down. In: vanHeerde-Hudson, J. (eds) The Political Costs of the 2009 British MPs’ Expenses Scandal. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034557_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034557_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44188-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03455-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)