Abstract
Today, cultural explanations loom large in modern economic analyses of the divergent performance of nations, past and present, mostly related with central intermediating variables such as ‘trust’ or ‘social capital’ (survey in Guiso et al. 2006). However, it is often difficult to distinguish neatly between merely historical and specifically cultural explanations, because the notion of culture is mostly introduced without a clearly elaborated theoretical foundation (Herrmann-Pillath 2010). In particular, it is difficult to distinguish neatly between cultural explanations and theories about institutional legacies (for example, Djankov et al. 2003). In current economic analyses, culture appears to be a certain general property of certain populations that directly affects individual behavior and that is inherited from earlier generations via cultural transmission, and often checked empirically via population-of-origin dummies in the econometric models. However, this would also apply for institutional legacies in general (especially informal ones, which are partly independent from the formal institutions prevailing at a certain time and place). Hence, most of this research is not based on a fully fledged theory of culture, especially with reference to the relation between micro-level transmission mechanisms and aggregate phenomena, which are normally in focus when talking about ‘cultures’ in anthropology and sociology (for related methodological troubles in social capital research, see Durlauf 2003).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aoki, M. (1988) Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Aoki, M. (2011) ‘Institutions as Cognitive Media between Strategic Interactions and Individual Beliefs’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 79, no 1–2, pp. 20–34.
Brewer, M. B. and Y.-r. Chen (2007) ‘Where (Who) Are Collectives in Collectivism? Toward Conceptual Clarification of Individualism and Collectivism’, Psychological Review, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 133–151.
Cao, N. L. (2008) ‘Boss Christians: The Business of Religion in the Wenzhou Model of Christian Revival’, The China Journal, vol. 59, pp. 63–88.
Chang, X. Q. (2010) Guanxi or Li shang wanglai? Reciprocity, Social Support Networks & Social Creativity in a Chinese Village (Taipei: Airiti Press).
Che, J. H. and Y. Y. Qian (1998) ‘Insecure Property Rights and Government Ownership of Firms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 467–496.
Davis, J. B. (2007) ‘Akerlof and Kranton on Identity in Economics: Inverting the Analysis’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 349–362.
Djankov, S. et al. (2003) ‘The New Comparative Economics’, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 595–619.
Dean, K. (2003) ‘Local Communal Religion in Contemporary South-east China’, The China Quarterly, vol. 174, pp. 338–358.
Durlauf, S. N. (2002) ‘On the Empirics of Social Capital’, The Economic Journal, vol. 112, pp. 459–479.
Gerth, K. (2003) China Made. Consumer Culture and the Creation of the Nation (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press).
Gold, T., D. Guthrie and D. Wank (eds) (2002) Social Connections in China. Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Greenhalgh, S. and E. A. Winckler (2005) Governing China’s Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
Greif, A. (1994) ‘Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 912–950.
Guiso, L., P. Sapienza and L. Zingales (2006) ‘Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 23–48.
Hannerz, U. (1992) Cultural Complexity. Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning (New York: Columbia University Press).
Headland, T. et al. (eds) (1990) Emics and Etics. The Insider/Outsider Debate (Newbury Park: Sage).
Heilmann, S. (2008) ‘From Local Experiments to National Policy: The Origins of China’s Distinctive Policy Process’, The China Journal, vol. 59, pp. 1–32.
Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2000) ‘Strange Notes on Modern Statistics and Traditional Popular Religion in China: Further Reflections on the Importance of Sinology for Social Science as Applied to China’, in L. von Mende and M. Siebert (eds), Ad Seres et Tungusos — Festschrift für Martin Gimm (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag), pp. 171–189.
Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2006) ‘Cultural Species and Institutional Change in China’, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 539–574.
Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2009) ‘Social Capital, Chinese Style: Individualism, Relational Collectivism and the Cultural Embeddedness of the Institutions-Performance Link’, The China Economic Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 325–350.
Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2010) ‘What Have We Learnt From Twenty Years of Economic Research Into Culture?’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 317–335.
Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2012) ‘Institutions, Distributed Cognition and Agency: Rule-following as Performative Action’, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 21–42.
Hofstede, G. (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill).
Huang, P. C. C. (2008) ‘Centralized Minimalism: Semiformal Governance by Quasi Officials and Dispute Resolution in China’, Modern China, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 9–35.
Kipnis, A. (2006) ‘Suzhi: A Keyword Approach’, The China Quarterly, vol. 186, pp. 295–313.
Kuran, T. (2009) ‘Explaining the Economic Trajectories of Civilizations: The Systemic Approach’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 593–605.
Li, H. B. and S. Rozelle (2003) ‘Privatizing Rural China: Insider Privatization, Innovative Contracts and the Performance of Township Enterprises’, The China Quarterly, vol. 176, pp. 981–1005.
Mertha, A. C. (2005) ‘China’s “Soft” Centralization: Shifting Tiao/Kuai Authority Relations’, The China Quarterly, vol. 184, pp. 791–810.
Nisbett, R. (2003) The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently… and Why (New York: Free Press).
Pomeranz, K. (2000) The Great Divergence. China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press).
Qian, Y. Y. and B. M. Weingast (1996) ‘China’s Transition to Markets: Market-preserving Federalism, Chinese Style’, Policy Reform, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 149–185.
Redding, S. G. (1996) ‘The Distinct Nature of Chinese Capitalism’, The Pacific Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 426–440.
Ross, D. (2007) ‘H. sapiens as Ecologically Special: What Does Language Contribute?’, Language Studies, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 710–731.
Smyth, R. (1997) ‘The Township and Village Enterprise Sector as a Specific Example of Regionalism — Some General Lessons for Socialist Transformation’, Economic Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 235–265.
Sutton, D. S. (2007) ‘Ritual, Cultural Standardization, and Orthopraxy in China: Reconsidering James L. Watson’s Ideas’, Modern China, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 3–21.
Tsai, L. L. (2007) Accountability without Democracy, Solidary Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Wang, J. (2008) Brand New China. Advertising, Media, and Commercial Culture (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press).
Watson, J. L. and R. S. Watson (2004) Village Life in Hong Kong. Politics, Gender, and Ritual in the New Territories (Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press).
Yang, M. M.-h. (2007) ‘Ritual Economy and Rural Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics’, in D. Held and H. Moore (eds), Cultural Politics in a Global Age: Uncertainty, Solidarity and Innovation (Oxford: Oneworld Publications), pp. 216–223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2012). Making Sense of Institutional Change in China: The Cultural Dimension of Economic Growth and Modernization. In: Aoki, M., Kuran, T., Roland, G. (eds) Institutions and Comparative Economic Development. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034014_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034014_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-03403-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03401-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)