Skip to main content

Conclusion: Communication, Identity and Representation Through Languages in War

  • Chapter
Languages and the Military

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Languages at War ((PASLW))

Abstract

Traditionally, linguists and philosophers have seen the primary purpose of language as being representation and communication. Language is what enables people to articulate things, ideas and attitudes in an intelligible form and to transmit the results to other people. More recently, linguists have recognized the importance of language in identities. Language enables us to express who we think we are and how we are connected with other people. The three functions of representation, communication and identity are intimately interwoven, and in each case language is the main means by which human beings carry out the crucial tasks of developing their understanding of the world, communicating with each other and negotiating their own place within it ( Joseph 2004). When these tasks are undertaken between members of different language communities, the balance between communication, representation and identity becomes both more complex and more critical to the outcomes of interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cronin, Michael. 2002. ‘The Empire Talks Back: Orality, Heteronomy and the Cultural Turn in Interpreting Studies’. In Translation and Power, edited by Maria Tymoczko and Edwin Gentzler: 45–62. Amherst and Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friel, Brian. 1981. Translations. London and Boston: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, Roman. 1960. ‘Linguistics and Poetics’. In Style in Language, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, John Earl. 2004. Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Paul, and Willett Kempton. 1984. ‘What is the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis?’ American Anthropologist 86(1): 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, John Durham. 1997. ‘“The Root of Humanity”: Hegel on Language and Communication’. In Figuring the Self: Subject, Absolute and Others in Classical German Philosophy, edited by David E. Klemm and Gunter Zoller. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Clausewitz, Carl. 1968. On War. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Michael Kelly

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kelly, M. (2012). Conclusion: Communication, Identity and Representation Through Languages in War. In: Footitt, H., Kelly, M. (eds) Languages and the Military. Palgrave Studies in Languages at War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137033086_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics