Skip to main content

Outward Foreign Direct Investment by Chinese Firms: Institutional Theory and Resource Dependence Perspectives

  • Chapter
Impacts of Emerging Economies and Firms on International Business

Abstract

The recent trend in large-scale movement of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) by emerging economies has attracted considerable attention in the International Business (IB) literature. Chinese firms’ OFDI has received perhaps the greatest attention. This development can be viewed in three stages. During the first stage (1978–1991), which began after the Chinese government’s initiation of its open-door policy, OFDI began to be conducted largely by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and was subject to strong regulations and scarce capital resources. The amount invested was modest and ranged from a low of US$39 million in 1981 to a high of US$5 billion in 1991 (UNCTAD, 2010). The second stage (1992–2002) saw an increase in OFDI stock value that reached US$37.1 billion at the end of 2002 (UNCTAD, 2010). This occurred due to changes in the domestic political environment and the adoption of the ‘Go Global’ policy by the Chinese government (Zhang and Filippov, 2009). In the third stage (2003 to the present), China experienced a sharp rise in both the growth rate and the absolute volume of its OFDI spreading to the world. While China’s ODFI accounts for less than 1 per cent of the total OFDI stocks in the world (although it rose from US$28 billion in 2000 to US$230 billion in 2009) and lags far behind the world average in terms of its ratio to GDP, the spectacular speed at which it is unfolding is noteworthy and deserves greater research attention (Zhang and Filippov, 2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barney, I.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1976). The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (2009). The internalization theory of the multinational enterprise: A review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years, Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Pj., Clegg, J., Cross, A.R., Voss, H., and Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment, Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casciaro, T. and Piskorski, M. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A close look at resource dependence theory, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2): 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., Lu, Y., and Tsai, T. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship in building an environmental protection system for the People’s Republic of China, Organization Studies, 28: 1103–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. and Rodrigues, S.B. (2005). The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension?, Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 381–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H. and Ellis, P. (2000). Porter’s competitive advantage of nations: Time for the final judgment, Journal of Management Studies, 37: 1189–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mello, L. (2010). Growth and Sustainability in Brazil, India, Indonesia, and South Africa. Paris: OECD Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity, International Business Review, 9(1): 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. and Narula, R. (2004). Multinational and Industrial Competitiveness: A New Agenda. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(1): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations, American Journal of Sociology, 82: 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 9: 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. and Khanna, T. (2003). Can India overtake China? Foreign Policy, 137: 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. and Singh, H. (2007). Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success, Strategic Management Journal, 28: 981–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. (1996). Success of the Transnational Transfer of Organizational Practices with MNEs. Unpublished PhD thesis, Carlson School of Management, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. and Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise, Academy ofManagement Review, 24: 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, D.M. and Zhu, A. (2008). China’s growth model: Problems and alternatives, Working Paper, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.C., and Groen, A.J. (2010). The resource-based view: A review and assessment of the critiques, Journal of Management, 36(1): 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G.K. and Lieberman, M.B. (2010). Acquisition vs. internal development as modes of market entry, Strategic Management Journal, 31: 140–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Zhang, Y., and Matlay, H. (2003). Entrepreneurship education in China, Education and Training, 45(8/9): 495–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. and Li, S. (2000). The road to capitalism: Competition and institutional change in China, Journal of Comparative Economics, 28: 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lictenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes, Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 822–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Xue, Q., and Han, B. (2010). How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China, Journal of World Business, 45(1): 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010). Economic Survey of China 2010. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1988). The technological dimension of corporate strategy, in R.A. Burdgelman and M.A. Maidique (eds) Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. Irwin, IL: Homewood, 211–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1996). What is strategy?, Harvard Business Review, 74: 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K.S. (2002). Back-Alley Banking: Private Entrepreneurs in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E.W.K. (1996). In search of legitimacy: The private entrepreneur in China, Entrepreneurship Theoty and Practice, 20: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2010). FDI database, http://www.unctadstat.unctad.org/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx, accessed 2 December 2010.

  • Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. and Lewin, A.Y. (2007). Outward foreign direct investments as escape response to home country institutional constraints, Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. and Chan, S. (2003). China’s outward direct investment: Expanding world-wide, China: An International Journal, 1(2): 273–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaprak, A. and Karademir, B. (2010). The Internationalization of emerging market business groups: An integrated literature review, International Marketing Review, 27(2): 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. and Filippov, S. (2009). Internationalization of Chinese firms in Europe, UNUMERIT, Working Paper 2009–041.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Tapan Seth and Attila Yaprak

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seth, T., Yaprak, A. (2012). Outward Foreign Direct Investment by Chinese Firms: Institutional Theory and Resource Dependence Perspectives. In: Marinov, M.A., Marinova, S.T. (eds) Impacts of Emerging Economies and Firms on International Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032546_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics