Abstract
There have been many innovations in the policy world of information privacy and data protection during the past 40 years. These range from the adoption of principles and guidelines, laws and directives, codes of practice, privacy-enhancing technologies, ‘privacy by design’, binding corporate rules, standard contractual clauses, and perhaps other devices. Some innovations are of long duration, universal, respected, and implemented with varying success, while others are adopted by few and scorned by many, perhaps ultimately to be remembered only as fleeting presences on the fashion catwalks of regulatory history. We can only use informed guesswork about whether privacy is better protected through these measures, because such judgements are not easily amenable to quantification. However, gains can be identified in terms of a growth of awareness, specific regulatory or judicial rulings, and instances of success in limiting or preventing the use of information processing and surveillance technologies and systems that would otherwise have enjoyed free rein with our personal information. Meanwhile, academic discourse develops arguments about the relationship between law and technology, about the role of software ‘code’ in embedding rules in information systems, and about how individual property solutions can be brought to bear upon the situation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 3/2010 on the Principle of Accountability, 13 July 2010. WP 173, Brussels: European Commission, 2010.
Bennett, C., International Privacy Standards: Can Accountability Ever Be Adequate?, Privacy Laws and Business International Newsletter August 2012, Issue 106: 21–3.
Bovens, M., Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework, European Law Journal 2007, 13, 4, 447–68.
Day, P. and Klein, R., Accountabilities: Five Public Services, London: Tavistock, 1987.
Goffman, E., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1959.
Government of Canada, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Privacy Impact Assessment Policy, 2 May 2002, Ottawa: Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, 2002.
Gray, A. and Jenkins, W., Administrative Politics in British Government, Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books, 1985.
Gray, J., McPherson, A. and Raffe, D., Reconstructions of Secondary Education: Theory, Myth and Practice since the War, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983.
Harmon, M., Responsibility as Paradox, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995.
International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, International Standards on the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy–The Madrid Resolution, Madrid: International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, 2009.
March, J. and Olsen, J., Democratic Governance, NY: Free Press, 1995.
McPherson, A., Raab, C. and Raffe, D., ‘Social Explanation and Political Accountability: Two Related Problems with a Single Solution’, paper presented to the Symposium on Accountability at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, Leeds, September 1978, 34 pp. roneoed; in the possession of the author.
Mulgan, R., ‘Accountability: An Ever-Expanding Concept?,’ Public Administration, 2000, 78, 3, 555–73.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data, Paris: OECD, 1981.
The Centre for Information Policy Leadership, ‘Data Protection Accountability: The Essential Elements–A Document for Discussion, October 2009’, Hunton and Williams LLP, 2009.
The Centre for Information Policy Leadership, ‘Demonstrating and Measuring Accountability–A Discussion Document, Accountability Phase II–The Paris Project, October 2010’, Hunton and Williams LLP, 2010.
The Centre for Information Policy Leadership, ‘Global Discussion on the Commonly-accepted Elements of Privacy Accountability–Galway, Ireland, April 29, 2009’, Hunton and Williams LLP, 2009.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Charles Raab
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raab, C. (2012). The Meaning of ‘Accountability’ in the Information Privacy Context. In: Guagnin, D., Hempel, L., Ilten, C., Kroener, I., Neyland, D., Postigo, H. (eds) Managing Privacy through Accountability. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032225_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032225_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35045-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03222-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)