Skip to main content

The Role of Intercultural Dialogue in the Rise of Modern Science

  • Chapter
Asia, Europe, and the Emergence of Modern Science
  • 181 Accesses

Abstract

The fact that many developments critical to the rise of modern science took place in Asia during the period known traditionally as the “Dark Ages” or the “Medieval Period” is now becoming better known. However, their description is usually found within the framework of single cultural heritages, where Chinese, Indian, or Islamic civilizational contributions to science are described separately.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

End Notes

  1. For China, see Joseph Needham’s series, Science and Civilization in China, 1st ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954); for Islamic civilization, see Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Science and Civilization in Islam (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968); and for

    Google Scholar 

  2. India, D. M. Bose, S. N. Sen, and B. V. Subbarayappa, A Concise History of Science in India (New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Toby E. Huff’s, The Rise of Early Modern Science (London: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Arun Bala, The Dialogue of Civilizations in the Birth of Modern Science (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Needham, The Grand Titration (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1969), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Pacey, Technology in World Civilization (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Needham, Clerks and Craftsman in China and the West (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 131–132.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Ching, Chinese Religions (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1993), 179.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. C. A. Ronan, The Shorter Science and Civilisation in China, vol. 1, An abridgement of Joseph Needham’s original text, vols. 1 and 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Needham, Science and Civilization in China, Vol. 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth (Taipei: Cave Books Ltd, 1986), 109.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. G. Joseph, The Crest of the Peacock, Non-European roots of Mathematics (London: Penguin Books, 1990), 347.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Russell, History of Western. Philosophy, counterpoint ed. (London: Routledge, 1984), 420.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Koestler, The Sleepwalkers (London: Pelican Books, 1968), 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. C. Lindberg, The Beginnings of Western Science (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2007), 160–161.

    Google Scholar 

  15. “It is natural to ask why Constantinople, where pure Greek culture had flourished without a break, and which would therefore seem at first sight the obvious centre for those interested in Greek Philosophy, did not become the Mecca of all Western scholars. The answer is complex and illustrates the larger question of the rift between East and West that existed all through the Middle Ages, that age-long and bitter misunderstanding between Greeks and Latins, which made close social and intellectual relationship impossible. To this must be added both the lack of a clear-cut programme among Western scholars, who by no means agreed that they were searching principally for works of philosophy, and a lack of contemporary Greek interest in philosophy as a principal mental pursuit.” D. Knowles, The Evolution of Medieval Thought, 2nd ed. (London: Longman, 1988), 168–169.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lynn Harry Nelson, Lectures in Medieval History 21: The Life of Gerbert Aurillac (ca. 955–1003); D. J. Mabry, The Historical Archive, 1990–2009, http://historicaltextarchive.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adelard of Bath, Warburg Institute Surveys and Text XIV, edited by C. Burnett (London: Warburg Institute, 1987), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. —, Dodi Ve-Nechdi, (Natural Questions), translated and edited by H. Gollancz (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1920), 98–99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Arun Bala

Copyright information

© 2012 Arun Bala

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khursheed, A. (2012). The Role of Intercultural Dialogue in the Rise of Modern Science. In: Bala, A. (eds) Asia, Europe, and the Emergence of Modern Science. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031730_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031730_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44083-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03173-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics