Skip to main content

‘Democratic Agents’ and ‘Agents of Democracy’ in Multilayered Governance

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Citizenship ((PASC))

Abstract

In an era of intensified globalisation the changing role of the nation state in the global political and economic order has become an ever more salient concern. The changing role of the state’s responsibilities and capabilities is often subsumed under the terms ‘multilevel’ or ‘multilayered’ governance, which alludes not only to the inclusion of public authorities at several territorial and institutional levels but also to the increased formal and informal influence and participation of non-state and private actors in public regulations. These developments have fuelled debates about the role of regional, international and global institutions, both as formal organisations that establish and enforce rules and as shared sets of norms and expectations that shape interaction between political and economic actors. They have has also fuelled debates about the subjects who are supposed to be the political actors in these institutional structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abizadeh, A. (2007) ‘Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope (not site) of Distributive Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 35: 318–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D. (2000) ‘Cosmopolitical Democracy’, New Left Review 4: 137–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D. (2002) ‘Demos and Cosmopolis’, New Left Review 13: 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, R., D. Castiglione, A. Follesdal and A. Weale (2010) ‘Evaluating Trustworthiness, Representation and Political Accountability in New Modes of Governance’, in A. Heretier and M. Rhodes (eds) New Modes of Governance in Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. (2000) ‘Socrates the Cosmopolitan’, Stanford Agora 1: 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. and R. Keohane (2006) ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, Ethics & International Affairs 20: 405–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. A. (1996) ‘The European Union and Forms of the State: Westphalian, Regulatory, or Post-Modern?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 34: 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnovitz, S. (2006) ‘Accountability of Non-Governmental Organizations in Global Governance’, in L. Jordan and P. van Tuijl (eds) NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles and Innovations (London: Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, T. (1996) The Rule of The Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, T. (2008) The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1989) Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (2006) On Political Equality (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. (2011) ‘Global Democratization: Soup, Society, or System?’, Ethics & International Affairs 25: 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. and S. Niemeyer (2008) ‘Discursive Representation’, American Political Science Review 102: 481–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erman, E. (2005) Human Rights and Democracy: Discourse Theory and Human Rights Institutions (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erman, E. (2006) ‘Rethinking Accountability in the Context of Human Rights’, Res Publica: A Journal of Legal and Social Philosophy 12: 249–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erman, E. (2008) ‘On Goodhart’s Global Democracy: A Critique’, Ethics & International Affairs 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erman, E. (2010) ‘Why Adding Democratic Values is Not Enough for Global Democracy’, in E. Erman and A. Uhlin (eds) Legitimacy Beyond the State? Re- examining the Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erman, E. (2011) ‘Human Rights Do Not Make Global Democracy’, Contemporary Political Theory 10: 463–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erman, E. (2012) ‘In Search of Democratic Agency in Deliberative Governance’, European Journal of International Relations, early online view. DOI: 10.1177/ 1354066111426622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erman, E. and A. Follesdal (2012) ‘Multiple Citizenship: Normative Ideals and Institutional Challenges’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15: 279–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erman, E. and R. Higgott (2010) ‘Deliberative Global Governance and the Question of Legitimacy: What can We Learn from the WTO?’, Review of International Studies 36: 449–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follesdal, A. (2011) ‘The Legitimacy Challenges for New Modes of Governance: Trustworthy Responsiveness’, Government & Opposition 46: 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. and C. List (2006) ‘A Conditional Defense of Plurality Rule: Generalizing May’s Theorem in a Restricted Informational Environment’, American Journal of Political Science 50: 940–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R., and R. Keohane (2005) ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’, American Political Science Review 99: 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996) ‘Reply to Symposium Participants’, Cardozo Law Review 17: 1477–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2002) ‘Law of States, Law of Peoples: Three Models of Sovereignty’, Legal Theory 8: 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2002) ‘New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy- making without Legislating?’ in A. Héritier (ed.) Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Julius, A. J. (2003) ‘Basic Structure and the Value of Equality’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 31: 321–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. (2004) ‘Governance Regimes and the Politics of Discursive Representation’, in N. Piper and A. Uhlin (eds) Transnational Activism in Asia: Problems of Power and Democracy (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. and K. Sikkink (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. (1983) ‘Two Distinctions in Goodness’, Philosophical Review 92: 169–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, K. and T. Macdonald (2010) ‘Democracy in a Pluralist Global Order: Corporate Power and Stakeholder Representation’, Ethics & International Affairs 24: 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, T. (2008) Global Stakeholder Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., L. Hooghe and K. Blank (1996) ‘European Integration from the 1980s: State- centric v. Multi- level governance’, Journal of Common Market Studies 34: 341–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M. (2004) ‘“Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is”: The Market as an Arena for Politics’, in C. Garsten and M. Lindh de Montoya (eds) Market Matters Exploring Cultural Processes in the Global Market (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M. and A. Follesdal (2007) ‘Shopping for Human Rights’, Journal of Consumer Policy 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M., A. Follesdal and D. Stolle, eds (2004) Politics, Products and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (2005) ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 33: 113–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystuen, G., A. Follesdal, and O. Mestad, eds (2011) Corporate Complicity, Human Rights Violations and Disinvestment: Legal and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peruzzotti, E. (2006) ‘Civil Society, Representation and Accountability’, in L. Jordan and P. van Tuijl (eds) NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles and Innovations (London: Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. (2003) ‘Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World Politics’, World Politics 55: 579–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2001) Justice as Fairness. A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, M. (2005) ‘Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification?’, Ethics & International Affairs 19: 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostboll, C. (2008) Deliberative Freedom: Deliberative Democracy as Critical Theory (Albany: State University of New York Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2004) ‘Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, Actors and Practices’, European Journal of International Relations 10: 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2007) ‘Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda’, KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series 07/029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. (2009) ‘Business and Human Rights: Towards Operationalizing the “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework’, Human Rights Council (A/HRC/11/13 22. April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (2005) ‘Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance,’ in D. Held and M. Koenig-Archibugi (eds) Global Governance and Public Accountability (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. and J. Dréze (1990) Hunger and Public Action (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, I. (2003) The State of Democratic Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, R. and C. J. Cowton (2004) ‘The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 52: 45–5 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J. and P. Nanz (2008) ‘Emergent Patterns of Civil Society Participation in Global and European Governance’, in J. Steffek, C. Kissling, and P. Nanz (eds) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooy, A. (2004) The Global Legitimacy Game: Civil Society, Globalization, and Protest (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Eva Erman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erman, E. (2012). ‘Democratic Agents’ and ‘Agents of Democracy’ in Multilayered Governance. In: Beckman, L., Erman, E. (eds) Territories of Citizenship. Palgrave Studies in Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031709_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics