Abstract
When considering the question of whether or not the Alaska model can be applied on a worldwide basis, it is necessary to consider both the strengths and shortcomings of the Alaska Permanent Fund (APF) and Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) as currently constituted. While several components of the APF and PFD could and should be replicated elsewhere, there are a few important aspects of the fund that need to be modified when applied to establishing similar new agencies elsewhere. Let us first consider the several positive aspects of the fund that should be retained when establishing new funds.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Karl Widerquist and Michael W. Howard
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartzok, A. (2012). Room for Improvement? Assessing the Strengths and Shortcomings of the Alaska Model in Advance of Export. In: Widerquist, K., Howard, M.W. (eds) Exporting the Alaska Model. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031655_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031655_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-66826-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03165-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)