Advertisement

The European Union: Initiator of a New European Anti-Discrimination Regime?

  • Johanna Kantola
  • Kevät Nousiainen
Part of the Gender and Politics series book series (GAP)

Abstract

The key aim of this chapter is to explore the possibilities and constraints that the complex setting of the European equality regime poses for ‘institutionalizing intersectionality’. That the EU has an impact on national equality law and policies is beyond question, but a study of various EU power instruments, institutions, and political actors is needed for a better understanding of the workings and the outcomes of the process. We pay attention especially to the complexity of EU equality law and policies, which involve multiple dimensions of equality and more or less compelling means of influencing the member states. We also show how intersectionality figures in these instruments, institutions, and policies of EU influence. We claim that the mandatory EU anti-discrimination law has compelled member states to adopt a minimum regulation of combating discrimination on several ‘status’ grounds. However, explicit statements on combating intersectional discrimination are located in soft law instruments or in policy programmes. Such instruments do not aim at a complete harmonization of equality law and policies, but rather promote convergence by methods that rely on national and ‘stakeholder’ processes. The ‘soft’ approach, we assume, allows differentiation within the EU and at the national level. Here diversity of traditions and policies becomes important.

Keywords

Member State Gender Equality Positive Action Equality Body Positive Duty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, K.A. (2001). ‘Civil Society and the White Paper Bridging or Jumping the Gaps?’ Jean Monnet Working Paper No.6/01, Symposium: Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, M. (2002). Anti-Discrimination Law and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beveridge, F. (2008). ‘Implementing Gender Equality and Mainstreaming in an Enlarged European Union: Prospects and Challenges’, in F. Beveridge and S. Velluti (eds), Gender and the Open Method of Coordination: Perspectives on Law, Governance and Equality in the EU (pp. 11–34 ). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Beveridge, F. (2011). ‘“Going Soft?” Analysing the Contribution of Soft and Hard Measures in EU Gender Law and Policy’, in E. Lombardo and M. Forest (eds), The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies: a Discursive-Sociological Approach (pp. 28–48 ). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Büchs, M. (2007). New Governance in European Social Policy: The Open Method of Coordination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burri, S., D. Schiek and the European Network of Legal Experts in the Field of Gender Equality. (2011). Multiple Discrimination in EU Law. Opportunities for legal responses to intersectional gender discrimination. EU Commission (Multiple Discrimination Report). http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/attachments/EU_MIDIS_DiF5-multiple-discrimination_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
  7. Corsi, M., M. Crepaldi, M. Samek Lodovici, R. Boccagni and C. Valilescu. (2008). Ethnic Minority and Roma Women in Europe: A Case for Gender Equality. http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738langId=enpubId=492type=2 furtherPubs=no (accessed 3 September 2011).Google Scholar
  8. Crenshaw, K. (1991). ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence against Women of Color’. Stanford Law Review 43, 1241–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cullen, P. (2009). ‘Pan-European NGOs and Social Rights: Participatory Democracy and Civil Dialogue’, in J. Joachim and B. Locher (eds), Transnational Activism in the UN and the EU: A comparative study (pp. 140–53 ). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Ellina, C.A. (2003). Promoting Women’s Rights: The Politics of Gender in the European Union. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2004). Equality and Non-Discrimination in an Enlarged European Union. Green Paper. DG for Employment and Social Affairs. Unit D. 3.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2007). Tackling Multiple Discrimination: Practices, Policies and Laws. DG for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.Google Scholar
  13. Eveline, J., C. Bacchi and J. Binns. (2009). ‘Gender Mainstreaming vs. Diversity Mainstreaming: Methodology as Emancipatory Politics’. Gender, Work & Organization 16: 2, 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredman, S. (2008a). Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fredman, S. (2008b). ‘Positive Rights and Positive Duties: Addressing Intersectionality’, in D. Schiek and V. Chege (eds), European Union Nondiscrimination Law. Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law (pp. 73–89 ). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Gerards, J.H. (2005). Judicial Review in Equal Treatment Cases. Leiden/Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Greenwood, J. (2004). ‘The Search for Input Legitimacy through Organized Civil Society in the EU’. Transnational Associations 2, 145–55.Google Scholar
  18. Hafner-Burton, E. and M. Pollack. (2009). ‘Mainstreaming Gender in the European Union: Getting the Incentives Right’. Comparative European Politics 7 (1), 114–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hancock, A.-M. (2007) ‘When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm’, Perspectives on Politics 5 (1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hankivsky, O. (2005). ‘Gender vs Diversity Mainstreaming: A Preliminary Examination of the Role and Transformative Potential of Feminist Theory’. Canadian Journal of Political Science 38: 4, 977–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holtmaat, R. (2007). European Network of Legal Experts in the non- discrimination field Catalysts for Change? Equality bodies according to Directive 2000/43/EC -– existence, independence and effectiveness.Google Scholar
  22. Hoskyns, C. (1996). Integrating Gender: Women, Law and Politics in the European Union. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  23. Hubert, A. and M. Stratigaki. (2007). ‘European Gender Institute: New Opportunities for Connecting Expertise, Policies and Civil Society’. Paper presented at the European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Tenth Biannual International Conference, Montreal, 17–19 May.Google Scholar
  24. Kantola, J. (2006) Feminists Theorize the State ( Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kantola, J. (2010). Gender and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Kantola, J. and K. Nousiainen (2009). ‘Institutionalising Intersectionality in Europe: Legal and Political Analyzes’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 11: 4, 459–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kollman, K. (2007) ‘Same-sex Unions: The Globalization of an Idea’, International Studies Quarterly 51 (2).Google Scholar
  28. Locher, B. (2007). Trafficking in Women in the European Union: Norms, Advocacy-Networks and Policy-Change. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Lombardo, E. and M. Verloo (2009). ‘Institutionalising Intersectionality in the European Union? Policy Developments and Contestations’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 11: 4, 478–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mabbett, D. (2005). ‘The Development of Rights-based Social Policy in the European Union: The Example of Disability Rights’. Journal of Common Market Studies 43: 1, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Masselot, A. (2007) ‘The State of Gender Equality Law in the European Union’, European Law Journal 13 (2), 152–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCrudden, C., S. Prechal and the Network of Legal Experts in the Field of Gender Equality. (2009). The Concepts of Equality and Non-Discrimination in Europe: A Practical Approach. EU Commission. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.Google Scholar
  33. Nielsen, R. (2008). ‘Is European Union Equality Law Capable of Addressing Multiple and Intersectional Discrimination Yet? Precautions against Neglecting Intersectional Cases’, in D. Schiek and V. Chege (eds), European Union Nondiscrimination Law. Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law (pp. 31–51 ). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Nousiainen, K. (2008). ‘Utility-Based Equality and Disparate Diversities’, in D. Schiek and V. Chege (eds), European Union Non -Discrimination Law. Comparative Perspectives on Multi -Dimensional Equality law (pp. 187–214 ). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Nousiainen, K. (2009). ‘Unification (or not) of Equality Bodies and Legislation’. European Gender Equality Law Review 2 (1), 24–33.Google Scholar
  36. Rees, T. (1998) Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union: Education, Training and Labour Market Policies ( London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  37. Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2008) ‘Civil society participation in EU gender policymaking: Framing strategies and institutional constraints’, Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3), 505–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2011). Gender Equality and Diversity at the Transnational Level: Challenges to European Union Policy-Making and Women’s Collective Mobilization. PhD Dissertation, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
  39. Rolandsen Agustín, L. and S. Roth. (2011). ‘Minority Inclusion, Self Representation and Coalition-Building. The Participation of Minority Women in European Women’s Networks’, A. Woodward, J.-M. Bonvin and M. Renom (eds), Transforming Gendered Well-being in Europe: The Impact of Social Movements (pp. 231–48 ). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  40. Schiek, D. (2011). ‘Organizing EU Equality Law around the Nodes of ‘Race, Gender and Disability’, in D. Schiek and A. Lawson (eds), European Union Non-Discrimination Law and Intersectionality: Investigating the Triangle of Racial, Gender and Disability Discrimination (pp. 11–28 ). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  41. Schiek, D. and J. Mulder. (2011). ‘Intersectionality in EU Law: A Critical Appraisal’, in D. Schiek and A. Lawson (eds), European Union Non-Discrimination Law and Intersectionality: Investigating the Triangle of Racial, Gender and Disability Discrimination (pp. 259–74 ). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Senden, L. (2004). Soft Law in European Community Law. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Senden, L. (2005). ‘Soft Law, Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in European Law: Where Do They Meet?’ Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 9. http://www.ejcl. org/91/abs91–3.html, accessed 14.05.2012.Google Scholar
  44. Somek, A. (2011). Engineering Equality: An Essay on European Anti-Discrimination Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Squires, J. (2005). ‘Is Mainstreaming Transformative? Theorising Mainstreaming in the Context of Diversity and Deliberation’. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 12: 3, 366–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Verloo, M. and van der Vleuten, A. (2009) ‘The discursive logic of ranking and benchmarking: Understanding gender equality measures in the European Union’ in Emanuela Lombardo, P. Meier and M. Verloo (eds), The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality. Stretching, Bending and Policy-making (pp. 169–85 ). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Waddington, L. (2005). ‘Implementing the Disability Provisions of the Framework Employment Directive: Room for Exercising National Discretion’, in A. Lawson and C. Gooding (eds), Disability Rights in Europe: From Theory to Practice (pp. 107–34 ). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, F. (2003). ‘Contesting “Race” and Gender in the European Union: a Multilayered Recognition Struggle for Voice and Visibility’, in B. Hobson (ed.), Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency and Power (pp. 121–44 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Zippel, K. (2008). ‘Institutionalizing Social Movements through Expertise’. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Meetings, Boston, MA, 1–4 August.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johanna Kantola
  • Kevät Nousiainen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations