Skip to main content

Proximal Positioning in Students’ Graph Commentaries

  • Chapter
Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres

Abstract

Visual data pervade disciplines and genres. Graphs, diagrams and tables illustrate and complement verbal contents in textbooks, exams, research articles or class notes across the academic field and may even stand as independent texts, especially in the hard sciences. Despite this ubiquity, however, the receptive and productive abilities they involve are acquired disjointedly and intuitively. We learn how to decode graphics during the early high school years (Myers, 2003), along with the language of the specific subjects and texts in which they are embedded, but normally do not verbalize them until later at university, if not once in the professional arena. This is the plight of many Spanish graduates. Technology people, in particular engineers, do not need to interpret visuals unless they interact with other communities of practice (Wenger, 1998) for whom the graphic information presented is abstruse or alien to their shared repertoires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthony, L. (2007) AntConc 3.2.1w http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/software.html (accessed 01/Nov./2011).

  • Bertin, J. (1981) Graphics and graphic information processing (Berlin: De Gruyter).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, V. K. (1997) ‘Genre-mixing in academic introductions’, English for Specific Purposes, 16 (3), 181–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D. and B. Gray (2010) ‘Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: complexity, elaboration, explicitness’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2005) Discourse. A critical introduction (Cambridge: CUP).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. and R. Ivanič (1997) The politics of writing (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, U. (1996) Contrastive rhetoric. Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing (Cambridge: CUP).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, W. J. (1990) ‘The illogic of logical connectives’, ELT Journal, 44 (4), 316–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ede, L. (1989) Work in progress: a guide to writing and revising (New York: St Martin’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, M. and R. Hargreaves (1980) Defining and verbalizing (London: Evans).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life (New York: Doubleday Anchor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1971) Relations in public (New York: Harper and Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2005) ‘Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse’, Discourse Studies, 7 (2), 173–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2006) English for academic purposes. An advanced resource book (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2008) ‘Disciplinary voices. Interactions in research writing’, English Text Construction, 1, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2010) ‘Constructing proximity: relating to readers in popular and professional science’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (2), 116–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. (2009) ‘Introduction. The sociolinguistics of stance’ in Jaffe, A. (ed.) Stance. Sociolinguistic perspectives (Oxford: OUP), pp. 1–28.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, A. M. (1998) ‘The visual and the verbal: a case study in macroeconomics’, English for Specific Purposes, 17 (2), 183–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerridge, D. (1992) Presenting facts and figures (London: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986) ‘Visualization and cognition: drawing things together’, Studies in the Sociology of Culture and Present, 6, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1998) ‘Multiplying meaning: visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text’ in Martin, J. and R. Veel (eds) Reading science: critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (New York: Routledge), pp. 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. and D. Rose (2003) Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause (London: Continuum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K. (2001) ‘Voice in Japanese written discourse: implications for second language writing’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K. (2011) ‘Conceptions of voice in writing assessment rubrics’, paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics-AAAL, Chicago, 26–29 March, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K. and C. M. Tardy (2007) ‘Voice in academic writing: the rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review’, English for Specific Purposes, 26, 235–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. (2003) ‘Words, pictures and facts in academic discourse’, Ibérica, 6, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, L. A. and T. Huckin N. (1991) Technical writing and professional communication (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B. (2002) ‘Genre, text type, and the English for Academic Purposes (EAP) classroom’ in Johns, A. M. (ed.) Genre in the classroom (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), pp. 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrić, B. (2010) ‘Students’ conceptions of voice in academic writing’ in Lorès-Sanz, R., P. Mur-Dueñas and E. Lafuente-Millán (eds) Constructing interpersonal-ity. Multiple perspectives on written academic genres (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars), pp. 325–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, H. E. (2006) Professional communication in engineering (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sancho Guinda, C. (2011) ‘Integrating approaches to visual data commentary: an exploratory case study’ in Bhatia, V. K., P. Sánchez-Hernández and P. Pérez-Paredes (eds) Researching specialized languages (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins), pp. 115–35.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. and S. Wong Scollon (2003) Discourses in place. Language in the material world (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1986) ‘A matter of prolonged fieldwork: notes towards a modal grammar of English’, Applied Linguistics, 7, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. M. and C. B. Feak (1997) ‘From information transfer to data commentary’ in Miller, T. (ed.) Functional approaches to written text: classroom applications (Washington, DC: United States Information Agency), pp. 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. M. and C. B. Feak (2004) Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity (Cambridge: CUP).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Carmen Sancho Guinda

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guinda, C.S. (2012). Proximal Positioning in Students’ Graph Commentaries. In: Hyland, K., Guinda, C.S. (eds) Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics