Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

There are some commonalities and divergences in the penal systems of the countries examined in this volume, and attempts to explicate both are fraught with difficulties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bataille, G. (1967) La part maudite (Paris: Editions de Minuit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (ed.) (2008) Imaginary Penalities (Cullompton, Devon: Willan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2006) Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1982) Limits to Pain (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R.A . (2001) Punishment, Communication and Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1982) ‘Two Laws of Penal Evolution’, in Gane, M. (ed.), The Radical Sociology of Durkheim and Mauss (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, D. (2012) ‘Analytical Reflections on Time in Custody’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 51 (1): 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulsman, L. (1986) ‘Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime’, Contemporary Crises, 10 (1): 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N. (2008) The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure (New York: The New Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M.A . (1992) ‘Utilitarianism and Retributivism: What’s the Difference?’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 29: 173–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelken, D. (2010) Comparative Criminal Justice (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V. (2010) Penal Abolitionism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V., Ryan, M. and Sim, J. (eds) (1995) Western European Penal Systems: A Critical Anatomy (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, J. (2008) ‘Pain and Punishment: The Real and the Imaginary in Penal Institutions’, in Carlen, P. (ed.), Imaginary Penalities (Cullompton, Devon: Willan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2012) ‘The Prison is an Outlaw Institution’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 52 (1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Vincenzo Ruggiero and Mick Ryan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruggiero, V. (2013). Conclusion. In: Ruggiero, V., Ryan, M. (eds) Punishment in Europe. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137028211_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics