Abstract
For the past 40 years, the material form of public art works has included media of various kinds. The use of film and video in public art practice breaks with a tradition of fixed, monumental public art, the memorial culture that writer W. G. Sebald describes as the official sanctioning of forgetting (Sebald, 2005). In a culture of moving image public installations, by contrast, the architectural fabric of the city becomes dynamic, uncertain and a fluid surface suggestive of the contingency of urban life. Each time we encounter a video screen the images may vary, depending, for example, on the particular intersection of a looped program and a finely timed daily commute. As time-based media, the presence of moving image screens in the city mixes with the various temporal flows of urban space. Each artwork is, of course, functioning in relation to a given environment, drawing on a tradition of site-specific art practice that became prominent in the 1970s (Kwon, 2003). The majority of what might be called intermedial public artworks has been commissioned for a particular location, negotiating with factors of history and neighborhood, material properties and environmental atmosphere, and the habitual and exceptional uses of a space by various communities, commuters, tourists and individuals. Site-specific art as it was conceived over 40 years ago challenges a heritage of timeless and universal public art, inserting into urban contexts artworks that surprise and engage; perhaps most significantly, many of these artworks can only be understood within the dynamic situation of their context (Finkelman, 2000).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Benjamin, Walter (1969) “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”, in Arendt, Hannah (ed.) Illuminations, Harry Zorn (trans.) (New York: Schocken Books).
Blade Runner (1982) Directed by Ridley Scott. Produced by Michael Deeley.
Finkelman, Tom (ed.) (2000) Dialogues in Public Art (Cambridge and London: MIT Press).
Kaprow, Alan (2008) “Video Art: Old Wine, New Bottle”, in Phillips, Glenn (ed.) California Video: Artists and Histories (Los Angeles: Paul J. Getty Museum).
Kwon, Miwon (2003) One Place After Another (Cambridge: MIT Press).
Schreuder, Catrien (2009) Pixels and Places: Video Art in Public Space (Rotterdam: Nai Publishers).
Sebald, Winfried G. (2005) Campo Santo, Anthea Bell (trans.) (London: Penguin).
Tschumi, Bernard (1996) Architecture and Disjunction (Cambridge and London: MIT Press).
Vidler, Anthony (2001) Warped Space: Art, Architecture and Anxiety in Modern Culture (Cambridge and London: MIT Press).
Artworks cited
Gerrard, John (2008) Oil Stick Work.
Goodwin, Dryden (2010) Linear.
Martin, Daria (2010) “Jubilee Line Customer Daydream Survey”, http://art.tfl.gov.uk/file-uploads/fck-files/file/PDF%20doc%20for%20Daria%20Martin.pdf, date accessed 27 May 2012.
Stokes, Matt (2010) The Stratford Gaff A Serio-Comick-Bombastick-Operatick Interlude.
Willats, Stephen (2007) Assumptions and Presumptions.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Janet Harbord and Tamsin Dillon
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harbord, J., Dillon, T. (2013). Encountering Screen Art on the London Underground. In: Berry, C., Harbord, J., Moore, R. (eds) Public Space, Media Space. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027764_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027764_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43974-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02776-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)