Skip to main content

Storyboarding, Spectacle and Sequence in Narrative Cinema

  • Chapter
Storyboarding

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting ((PSIS))

  • 360 Accesses

Abstract

In 1993, Annette Michelson proposed that ‘the last half-century of [cinema]’s development [is] the period in which production design was largely characterized by the adoption of the storyboard’.1 This assertion sees the development starting in the late 1930s, if not a little later, and would tend to confirm the pivotal position of Walt Disney and William Cameron Menzies in the evolution of the form. As we have already seen, Menzies at least was already using similar methods long before this time, though this made him an innovator in methods of pre-production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Annette Michelson, Drawing into Film: Directors’ Drawings (New York: Pace Gallery, 1993), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fionnuala Halligan, Movie Storyboards: The Art of Visualizing Screenplays (San Francisco: Chronicle, 2013), p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Raphaël Saint-Vincent, ‘1992, Ou la Découverte du (Nouveau) Monde du Storyboard en France’, Storyboard 4 (June-August 2003), pp. 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For discussion of this point, see Steven Price, A History of the Screenplay (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2013), p. 178.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Alan David Vertrees, Selznick’s Vision: Gone with the Wind and Hollywood Filmmaking (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1997), p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kristina Jaspers, ‘Zur Entstehungsgeschichte und Funktion des Storyboards’, in Katharina Henkel, Kristina Jaspers, and Peter Mänz (eds), Zwischen Film und Kunst: Storyboards von Hitchcock bis Spielberg (Bielefeld: Kerber, 2012), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent LoBrutto, The Filmmaker’s Guide to Production Design (New York: Allworth, 2002), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  8. John Hart, The Art of the Storyboard: A Filmmaker’s Introduction (Burlington, MA: Focal Press, 2008), p. 27.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas Schatz, The Genius of the System: Hollywood Filmmaking in the Studio Era (New York: Henry Holt, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Katharina Henkel and Rainer Rother, ‘Vorwort’, in Katharina Henkel, Kristina Jaspers, and Peter Mänz (eds), Zwischen Film und Kunst: Storyboards von Hitchcock bis Spielberg (Bielefeld: Kerber, 2012), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elizabeth Cowie, ‘Classical Hollywood Cinema and Classical Narrative’, in Steve Neale and Murray Smith (eds), Contemporary Hollywood Cinema (London: Routledge, 1998), p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Katharina Henkel, ‘Zur Umsetzung von Gezeichneten in Bewegte Bilder: in Fimcheck’, in Katharina Henkel, Kristina Jaspers, and Peter Mänz (eds), Zwischen Film und Kunst: Storyboards von Hitchcock bis Spielberg (Bielefeld: Kerber, 2012), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Some of the major arguments on each side of this debate are conveniently presented in Steve Neale and Murray Smith (eds), Contemporary Hollywood Cinema (London: Routledge, 1998); see in particular Richard Maltby, ‘“Nobody Knows Everything”: Post-Classical Historiographies and Consolidated Entertainment’, pp. 3–21, and Murray Smith, ‘Theses on the Philosophy of Hollywood History’, pp. 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. William Goldman, Adventures in the Screen Trade (New York: Warner, 1983), p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  15. David Bordwell, Janet Staiger, and Kristin Thompson, The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960 (London: Routledge, 1985).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Robert L. Carringer, The Making of Citizen Kane, 2nd edition. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carringer, The Magnificent Ambersons: A Reconstruction (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  18. James Wong Howe, ‘Upsetting Traditions with Viva Villa’, American Cinematographer (June 1934), p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dan Gagliasso, ‘Heir to a Tradition’, American Cowboy (July-August 2006), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Andrew Horton, Henry Bumstead and the World of Hollywood Art direction (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2003), pp. 60–65, 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

  21. David Sylvester, Moonraker, Strangelove and Other Celluloid Dreams: The Visionary Art of Ken Adam (London: Serpentine Gallery, 1999), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laurent Bouzereau, The Art of Bond: From Storyboard to Screen: The Creative Process Behind the James Bond Phenomenon (London: Boxtree, 2006), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For a detailed analysis, see Adrian Turner, Goldfinger (London: Bloomsbury, 1998), pp. 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Paul Joseph Gulino, Screenwriting: The Sequence Approach (New York: Continuum, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jürgen Berger, Production Design: Ken Adam: Meisterwerke der Filmarchitektur (Munich: L. Werner, 1994), p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Léon Barsacq, Caligari’s Cabinet and Other Grand Illusions: A History of Film Design, rev. Elliott Stein (New York: Little, Brown, 1976), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bouzereau, op. cit.; Paul Duncan (ed.), The James Bond Archives: 007 (Cologne: Taschen, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Numerous examples of Harryhausen’s early input during the development of film projects can be found in Ray Harryhausen and Tony Dalton’s Ray Harryhausen’s Fantasy Scrapbook: Models, Artwork and Memories from 65 Years of Filmmaking (London: Aurum, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. For more discussion of the Dynamation process, see Ray Harryhausen and Tony Dalton, Ray Harryhausen: An Animated Life (London: Aurum, 2009), p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ray Harryhausen and Tony Dalton, The Art of Ray Harryhausen (London: Aurum, 2011), p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  31. For a more detailed discussion of the instrumental role played by physical landscapes in the shaping of stop-motion animation, see Chris Pallant, ‘The Stop-Motion Landscape’, in Chris Pallant (ed.), Animated Landscapes: History, Form, and function (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015), pp. 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Michael Carreras, One Million Years B.C. (London: Hammer; Seven Arts Productions, c. 1965), p. 68 -The Ray & Diana Harryhausen Foundation Archives.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Chris Pallant and Steven Price

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pallant, C., Price, S. (2015). Storyboarding, Spectacle and Sequence in Narrative Cinema. In: Storyboarding. Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027603_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics