Skip to main content

The EU and China’s Perceptions of Democracy and Their Impact on China-EU Relations

  • Chapter
Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations

Abstract

Being two major locomotives of economic globalization, the EU and China have fundamental divergences in their views on a just political system. Such divergences hinge on their perceptions of democracy and its appropriate role in bilateral and multilateral contexts. Although democracy as an idea has been embraced by both sides, it has been a consistent source of misunderstandings and conflicts. Major divergences exist at two levels. First, the EU and China disagree regarding whether China is a democracy. While the EU treats China’s political system as undemocratic, China believes that the current system reflects its national conditions and has performed well in accommodating democracy. Second, the EU believes that democratic values can be externally promoted while China opposes external intervention. China treats democracy as purely a domestic issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Shi Tianjian, “China: Democratic Values Supporting an Authoritarian System”, in Yun-han Chu et al., eds, How East Asians View Democracy, New York: Columbia University Press, 2008, pp. 209–37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Yuezhi Zhao, “Media and Elusive Democracy in China”, The Public, vol. 8, no. 4, 2001, pp. 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mao Tse-tung, Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1961, p. 327.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruce Dickson, Wealth into Power, The Communist Party’s Embrace of China’s Private Sector, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, p. 3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Philippe C. Schmitter, “Making Sense of the EU: Democracy in Europe and Europe’s Democratization”, Journal of Democracy, vol. 14, no. 4, October 2003, pp. 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See Samuel Huntington, The Third Wave of Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Andre Kaiser, “Types of Democracy”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 9, no. 4, 1997, pp. 419–44;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hans J. Lieber, ed., Politische Theorien von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, vol. 1, Wiesbaden: Fourier Verlag GmbH, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Julia Kwong, “Democracy in China: Voting for Beijing People’s Congress Delegates”, Asian Affairs, vol. 35, no. 1, Spring 2008, pp. 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. See Jie Chen, “Popular Support for Village Self-Government in China”, Asian Survey, vol. 45, no. 6, 2005, pp. 865–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu Jintao, Gao Ju Zhong Guo Te Se She Hui Zhu Yi Wei Da Qi Zhi, Wei Duo Qu Quan Mian Jian She Xiao Kang She Hui Xin Sheng Li Er Fen Dou [Hold High the Flag of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and Struggle for New Victories in Constructing a Comprehensive Well-off Society], Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe [People’s Publishing House], 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scott Kennedy, The Business of Lobbying in China, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2005, p. 210.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Ronald Inglehart and Christian Welzel, “How Development Leads to Democracy: What We Know about Modernization,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 88, no. 2, March/April 2009, pp. 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See also Andrew Nathan and Tianjian Shi, “Cultural Requisites for Democracy in China: Findings from a Survey”, Daedalus, vol. 122, no. 2, 1993, pp. 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Ronald M. Glassman, China in Transition: Communism, Capitalism, and Democracy, New York: Praeger, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yongnian Zheng, Discovering Chinese Nationalism in China: Modernization, Identity and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, China’s EU Policy Paper, Beijing, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Commission of the European Communities, A Maturing Partnership — Shared Interests and Challenges in EU-China Relations, Commission Policy Paper, Brussels, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Stefanie Weil and Yijia Jing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weil, S., Jing, Y. (2012). The EU and China’s Perceptions of Democracy and Their Impact on China-EU Relations. In: Pan, Z. (eds) Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027443_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics