Skip to main content

Conceptual Differences of Strategic Partnership in EU-China Relations

  • Chapter

Abstract

On the establishment of the EU-China strategic partnership, the then high representative of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy, Javier Solana, stated that “the EU wants to work alongside China in addressing key problems, since the two sides are both strong, and are both looking to make constructive contributions to the stability of our regions and of the international community.”1 Today, China has become one of the main foci for the EU’s strategic partnership concept in the EU’s effort to promote effective multilateralism with an ever stronger and ever more important China. However, growing frictions in the Sino-European relationship have shown not only that the “relationship is getting serious and the honeymoon is over” but also that there is a lack of understanding and knowledge about the other entity and its respective comprehension of the concept of a strategic partnership. In fact, there seems to be a conceptual gap between China and the EU. Most literature on EU-hina relations and the strategic partnership in particular has so far focused on the policy-relevant side of the relationship, such as mutual expectations and global challenges to tackle together. However, there is a lack of debate on the circumstances that have influenced the formulation of the strategic partnership and those expectations in the first place — hence, on the circumstances that lead to a conceptual gap between China and the EU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Eberhard Sandschneider, “The Strategic Significance of China-EU Partnership”, Foreign Affairs Journal, special issue, November 2009; Jonathan Holslag, “The Elusive Axis: Evaluating the EU-hina Strategic Partnership”, BICCS Asia Papers, vol. 4, no. 2, 2009; Jonathan Holslag, “The Strategic Dissonance between Europe and China”, Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 3, no. 3, 2010, pp. 325–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Michael Yahuda, “China and Europe: The Significance of a Secondary Relationship”, in Thomas W. Robinson and David Shambaugh, eds, Chinese Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995;

    Google Scholar 

  3. May-Britt U. Stumbaum, The EU and China: EU Decision-Making in Foreign and Security Policy toward the People’s Republic of China, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Yahuda, “The Sino-European Encounter: Historical Influences on Contemporary Relations”, in David Shambaugh, Eberhard Sandschneider, and Zhou Hong, eds, China-urope Relations: Perceptions, Politics and Prospects, New York: Routledge, 2008, pp. 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Günther Maihold, “‘Strategische Partnerschaft’ und Schwacher Interregionalismus, Die Beziehungen zwischen Brasilien und der EU”, in Annegret Bendiek and Heinz Kramer, eds, Globale Außenpolitik der Europäischen Union: Interregionale Beziehungen und “Strategische Partnerschaften”, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009, pp. 190–208.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Council of the European Union, A Secure Europe in a Better World: The European Security Strategy, Brussels, 12 December 2003, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For the debate on “Civilian Power” Europe, see Hanns W. Maull, “Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 69, no. 5, Fall 1990, pp. 91–106;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karen E. Smith, “The End of Civilian Power EU: A Welcome Demise or Cause for Concern?” International Spectator, vol. 35, no. 2, April–June 2000, pp. 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Among others, see Günther Maihold, “Conclusion: Leadership Coalitions as a New Element for the EU’s External Action”, in Jörg Husar, Günther Maihold, and Stefan Mair, eds, Europe and New Leading Powers: Towards Partnership in Strategic Policy Areas, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010, pp. 149–56; Sven Biscop and Thomas Renard, “A Need for Strategy in a Multipolar World: Recommendations to the EU after Lisbon”, Security Policy Brief, no. 5, January 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Su Hao, “Harmonious World: The Conceived International Order in Framework of China’s Foreign Affairs”, in Masafumi Iida, ed., China’s Shift: Global Strategy of the Rising Power, NIDS Joint Research Series, no. 3, 2009, pp. 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  11. May-Britt U. Stumbaum, “Opportunities and Limits of EU-hina Security Cooperation”, International Spectator, vol. 42, no. 3, September 2007, pp. 351–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Per Gullestrup and May-Britt U. Stumbaum, “Coping with Piracy: The European Union and the Shipping Industry”, in Bibi van Ginkel and Frans-Paul van der Putten, eds, The International Response to Somali Piracy: Challenges and Opportunities, Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, China’s EU Policy Paper, Beijing, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. David Shambaugh, “China and Europe: The Development from Secondary to an Independent Relationship”, in Xinning Song and Xiaojin Zhang, eds, China and Europe Towards the Twenty-first Century, Hong Kong: Social Sciences Press, 1997, pp. 33–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhongqi Pan, “Managing the Conceptual Gap on Sovereignty in China-EU Relations”, Asia Europe Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, 2010, pp. 227–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 May-Britt U. Stumbaum and Wei Xiong

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stumbaum, MB.U., Xiong, W. (2012). Conceptual Differences of Strategic Partnership in EU-China Relations. In: Pan, Z. (eds) Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027443_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics