Skip to main content

Introduction: Exploring the Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations

  • Chapter
Book cover Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations

Abstract

Almost nobody disputes that China and Europe do not share many political values, even though they usually use the same value-laden concepts in their political discourse. But the different ways that those concepts have been theorized and employed by China and Europe still remain inadequately explored. As interactions between China and the EU, as well as its member states, have become increasingly intensified since the turn of new century, especially after a China-EU comprehensive strategic partnership was claimed in 2003, numerous research projects and academic conferences have been devoted to this flowering but still difficult relationship. Among other topics, mutual perceptions and/or misperceptions, which are deemed to have a far-reaching impact on China-EU relations,1 turns out to be the most appealing. In our view, however, mutual perceptions per se are insufficient to explain either progress or setbacks in China-EU relations. China and the EU’s perception of each other and their relationship being dynamic and variable, mutual perceptions as such need to be explained by other parameters, one of which could be defined as the difference in their interpretations of the same political concept that may have more profound implications on the China-EU relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. David Shambaugh, Eberhard Sandschneider, and Zhou Hong, eds, China-Europe Relations: Perceptions, Policies and Prospects, London: Routledge, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhongqi Pan, “Managing the Conceptual Gap on Sovereignty in China-EU Relations”, Asia Europe Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, 2010, pp. 227–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lassa Oppenheim, International Law: A Treatise, New York: Longmans Green, 1905, p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dana Radler, “National Sovereignty — A Burden on the Shoulders of European Members?” The Sphere of Politics, vol. 112, 2004, pp. 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ian Manners, “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 40, no. 2, June 2002, pp. 235–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng Xiaoping, Deng Xiaoping Wenxuan [Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping] (Vol. III), Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe [People’s Publishing House], 1993, p. 284, p. 244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Zhongqi Pan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pan, Z. (2012). Introduction: Exploring the Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations. In: Pan, Z. (eds) Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027443_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics