Abstract
A bedridden child watches the ceiling of a barren hospital room, in some remote corner of a huge empire—the Soviet empire. He has no other contact with the outside world, or any other means of distraction, than the radio station in the room, playing classical tunes he will develop a great love for. The child is afflicted with bone tuberculosis, and soon a chunk of his leg will be removed. In the meantime he lets his mind wander, away from his sick and painful body, carried by the music, to depths and heights unsuspected. In spite of the limp incurred from the surgery, the sad and thoughtful child will live and grow, and soon become one of the world’s most celebrated and adventurous cinematic auteurs. His oeuvre is deeply informed by the life-branding clinical ordeal as well as the gloomy loneliness of a long convalescence, brightened, like a spark in the dark, by the mellifluous tunes of the great masters of what, to him, is the only “real” music.1 And, some 40 odd years later, in the winter of 2001, in spite of his limp, after years of walks through museums all over the Soviet Union, but also western and eastern corners of the world, driven by his endless love of high art (not only classical music, but also the great painters, especially Rembrandt, Rubens, El Greco, Van Dyck), he will walk across the many halls of a great museum and produce the first ever single-take feature film in cinema history. The utopian dream of a child who might easily have died or never walked again led to one of the great utopias in the history of the cinematic medium.
Bce знают будущее, прошлое все забыли..
(“Everyone knows the future. It is the past everyone has forgotten.”)
—Alexander Sokurov
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Anderson, “Russian Ark,” in Tativille (27 March 2008), http://tativille.blogspot.com/2007/03/ russian- ark-2002-russiagermany-96.html.
J. Baltrušaitis, Anamorphic Art, trans. W. J. Strachan (New York: H. N. Abrams, 1977).
A. Bazin, “William Wyler ou le janséniste de la mise en scène,” La Revue du Cinéma (February and March) (pp. 10–11).
E. Bloch, Erbschaft dieser Zeit (Zurich: Oprecht & Helbling, 1935).
T. Campbell, Review of Bipedalism, in Kinokultura (10 September 2005), www.kinokultura.com/reviews/R10-05priamokhozhdenie.html.
M. A. de Custine, Russie en 1839 (Brussels: Société typographique belge, 1844).
G. Deleuze, Cinema 1: The Movement-Image, trans. H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1986).
G. Deleuze, Cinema 2: Time-Image (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1989).
M. Foucault, Of Other Spaces(1967), http://foucault.info/documents/heteroTopia/foucault.heteroTopia.en.html. Accessed on July 13, 2010.
J. Gambrell, “The Museum as Time Machine,” Art in America 91:7 ( July), 29–31.
J. Hoberman, “And the Ship Sails On,” Film Comment 212 (September–October), 54.
A. Ippolitov, “Mir-Rossia-Peterburg-Ermitazh,” in Sokurov, Chasti Rechi, ed. L. Arkus (St Petersburg: Seans, 2006, pp. 283–91).
F. Jameson, “History and elegy in Sokurov,” Critical Inquiry 33:1 (2006), 1–12.
F. Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991).
D. Kujundzic, “After ‘After’: The Arkive Fever of Alexander Sokurov,” Quarterly Review of Film and Video 21:3 (2004), 219–239.
J. Lacan, Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis, ed. J.-A. Miller, trans. A. Sheridan (London: Hogarth Press, 1977).
J.-A. Miller, “Suture—elements of the logic of the signifier” (1966), http://www.lacan.com/symptom8_articles/miller8.html. Accessed on 12 July 2010. This text was published in French in Cahiers pour l’analyse 1 (Winter 1966); subsequently its English version, translated by Jacqueline Rose, appeared in Screen 18 (Winter 1978).
G. McNab, “Palace in Wonderland,” Sight and Sound 12:8 (August 2002): 20–2.
A. Nadel, “What makes films historical?” Film Quarterly 62:3 (Spring 2009), 76–80.
T. Pipolo, “Whispering Images,” Film Comment 212 (September–October 2002), 52–61.
K. Ravetto-Biagioli, “Floating on the Borders of Europe,” Sokurov’s Russian Ark. Film Quarterly 59 (2005), 18–26.
R. A. Rosenstone, Visions of the past: The Challenge of Film to our Idea of History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).
R. A. Rosenstone, History on Film/Film on History (Harlow, UK: Pearson Education, 2006).
A. Sokurov, “Interview with Aleksandr Sokurov,” conducted by Jeremi Szaniawski, Critical Inquiry 33:1 (2006), 13–27.
J. Szaniawski, Historic space in Sokurov’s Moloch, Taurus and The Sun. Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema 1:2 (2007), 147–162, doi: 10.1386/srsc.1.2.147/1.
C. Tesson, “Restauration,” Cahiers du Cinéma 569 (June 2002), 48–49.
M. Yampolsky, “Smert v kino,” in Sokurov, ed. L. Arkus (St Petersburg: Seans, 1994, pp. 273–8).
M. Yampolsky, “Lovets istorii sredi ee eksponatov,” in Sokurov: Chasti Rechi, ed. L. Arkus, (St Petersburg: Seans, 2006, pp. 277–81).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Jeremi Szaniawski
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szaniawski, J. (2012). Elegy, Eulogy, and the Utopia of Restoration—Alexander Sokurov’s Russian Ark. In: Vacche, A.D. (eds) Film, Art, New Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026132_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026132_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32358-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02613-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)