Skip to main content

The Role of Physical Space and Information Technologies in Knowledge Transfer Processes within SMEs

  • Chapter
Understanding Organizations in Complex, Emergent and Uncertain Environments

Summary

The ability to create and replicate knowledge is important for organizations. Some organizational resources are easy to transfer, but knowledge, which is usually tacit and based on individuals, is more difficult to reproduce. Because knowledge is a valuable, rare and inimitable resource (Barney, 1991: 112), it is a relevant source of competitive advantage (Grant, 1996: 376), and organizations should look for the most efficient and effective way to manage it.

The present study focuses particularly on knowledge transfer, a phase of knowledge management (KM) in which new knowledge is assimilated by the majority of organization members. New knowledge is created or acquired by a few individuals or small groups in firms, and it is important for organizations to ensure that all of their employees are able to assimilate and use the new intangible resource (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990). This chapter analyses two organizational elements that support knowledge transfer in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): (1) the attributes and conditions of physical space and (2) the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs).

To evaluate the phenomenon under study, a two-stage exploratory research was conducted on SMEs. Findings suggest that the design of physical space and the layout of the organization enhance the transfer of knowledge by facilitating the process in a fast and timely manner and allowing for open interaction among employees. Furthermore, informal communications mechanisms, such as face-to-face chats, messaging and email, are more relevant in a knowledge-transfer process than ICT. Technology itself will never transfer knowledge; it is mainly a means that, due to its inherent capabilities, can disseminate it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkley, I. (2006). ‘Defining the knowledge economy’. Knowledge economy programme report. The Work Foundation, July 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. (1990). ‘Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. N. (2004). ‘Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization’. Management Science, 50 (3), 352–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efimova, L. (2004). ‘Discovering the iceberg of knowledge work: A weblog case’. http://www.uibk.ac.at/congress/oklc2004

  • Fiddler, L. (2000). Facilitators and Impediments to the Internal Transfer of Team-embodied Competences in Firms Operating in Dynamic Environments. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). ‘Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm’. Strategy Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), 109–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, B. P. (2007). ‘The impact of the behavioural environment on office productivity’. Journal of Facilities Management, 5 (3), 158–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, J. M. and Baker, K. (2007). Building Community in Buildings: The Design and Culture of Dynamic Workplaces. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, C. (1995). ‘Theories of the firm, strategic management, and leadership’. In C. Montgomery (ed.) Resources-based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm. Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 179–218.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lamproulis, D. (2007). ‘Cultural space and technology enhance the knowledge process’. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11 (4), 20–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, N. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell, C. and Grayson, C. J. (1998). ‘If only we knew what we know: Identification and transfer of internal best practices’. California Management Review, 40 (3), 154–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1996). The Knowledge Based Economy OECD, Paris: http://www.oecd.org/dataoOecd/51/8/1913021.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004). The Significance of Knowledge Management in the Business Sector OECD, Paris: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/53/40/33641372.pdf, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riege, A. (2005). ‘Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider’. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (3), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (2003). ‘The social consumption of information and communication technologies (ICTs): Insights from research on the appropriation and consumption of new ICTs in the domestic environment’. Cognition, Technology and Work, 5 (1), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, J. (1997). Reinventing the Workplace. London: Elsevier Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zágarra, C. and García-Falcón, J. M. (2003). ‘Factors favoring knowledge management in work teams’. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7 (2), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, L. (2004). Los Determinantes de la Generación y la Transferencia del Conocimiento en Pequeñas Empresas de Tecnologías de la Información en Barcelona. Doctoral thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, España.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, L. and Pineda, J. (2006). ‘Generación y transferencia de conocimiento en pequeñas empresas: Estudio de casos en el sector de las tecnologías de la información’. Universidad de Chile, Revista Estudios en Administración, 13 (1), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, L. Rialp, J. and Rialp, A. (2009). ‘Generation and transfer of knowledge in IT-related SMEs’. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13 (5), 246–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, R. A. and Carmines, E. G. (1980). Measurement in the Social Sciences: The Link between Theory and Data. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Laura Zapata-Cantu, José Luis Pineda and Diego A. Rodríguez Lozano

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zapata-Cantu, L., Pineda, J.L., Lozano, D.A.R. (2012). The Role of Physical Space and Information Technologies in Knowledge Transfer Processes within SMEs. In: Davila, A., Elvira, M.M., Ramirez, J., Zapata-Cantu, L. (eds) Understanding Organizations in Complex, Emergent and Uncertain Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026088_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics