Skip to main content

Summary

SMEs are now an important and integral part of a country’s economy and have been acknowledged as being very different to their larger counterparts (Street and Meister, 2004). The economic viability of many economies is dependent on the survival and future growth of this sector. However, small firms are increasingly exposed to competition from larger, resource-rich firms; therefore, it is not uncommon for SMEs to become involved in collaborations to grow their business, increase their competitive position and leverage opportunities presented by new technologies (e-Collaboration) (Lawson and Hol, 2007). Although emerging research suggests that e-Collaboration is vital for the future survival of small to medium-sized businesses (Henttonen and Blomqvist, 2005; Lawson and Hol, 2007), it also stresses that dealing with issues surrounding trust becomes of paramount importance. This chapter presents a discussion on the role and importance of trust in collaborative SME environments and provides a starting point from which to develop an understanding of SME e-Collaboration trust, its determinants and dimensionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abdul-Rahman, A. and Hailes, S. (2000). ‘Supporting trust in virtual communities’. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hakim, L., Bali, R. and Wickramasinghe, N. (eds) (2008). Editorial. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 5 (1), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2004). The Practice of Social Research ( 10th Edition ). Australia: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1983). The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, P. (2002). ‘Networking tourism SMEs: eCommerce and emarketing issues in regional Australia’. Information Technology and Tourism, 5 (1), 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, L. L. and Johnson, V. E. (2008). (Eds) ‘Computer mediated relationships and trust: Managerial organizational effects’. Information Science Reference. IGI Global, Hershey, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetto, Y. and Farr-Wharton, R. (2007). ‘The moderating role of trust in SME owner/managers’ decision-making about collaborating’. Journal of Small Business Management, 45 (3), 362–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, L. and Jones, M. (2009). The Mechanics of eCollaboration: Why it Works: An Empirical Assessment of Australian SMEs. SiNet Conference, University of Wollongong, Australia, 29–30 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, L. and Holsapple, C. (2005). ‘Understanding computer-meditated inter-organisational collaboration: A model and framework’. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (1), 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, K. S. and Coulter, R. A. (2002). ‘Determinants of trust in a service provider: The moderating role of length of relationship’. Journal of Service Marketing, 16 (1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P. M. and Cannon, J. P. (1997). ‘An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships’. Journal of Marketing, April, 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, M. (2005). E-Collaborations and Virtual Organisations. USA: IRM Press, Idea Group, Hershey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnell, S. M. and Karweni, T. (1999). ‘Security implications of electronic commerce: A survey of consumers and businesses’. Internet Research, 9 (5), 372–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’ (pp. 105–17 ). In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1995). ‘Does familiarity breed trust? The implication of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances’. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1), 85–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, M. M., Yuan, Y. and Archer, N. (2001). Building Trust in E-Commerce: A Theoretical Framework. Proceedings of the Second World Congress on the Management of Electronic Commerce, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrikse, G., Tuunanen, M., Windsperger, J. and Cliquet, G. (2008). Strategy and Governance of Networks. Dordrecht: The Netherlands Physica-Verlag GmbH & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henttonen, K. and Blomqvist, K. (2005). ‘Managing distance in a global virtual team: The evolution of trust through technology-mediated relational communication’. Strategic Change, March/April, 14(2), 107–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagdev, H. S. and Thoben, K. D. (2001). ‘Anatomy of enterprise collaborations, production planning and control’, 12, 437–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Leidner, D. E. (1999). ‘Communication and trust in global virtual teams’. Organization Science, 10 (6), 791–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. and George, J. (1998). ‘The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork’. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 531–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2005). The Use of Qualitative Analysis Software with Grounded Theory. Paper presented at the QRC05, Johor Bharu, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, R., Martin, X. and Noorderhaven, N. G. (2006). ‘When does trust mat-ter to alliance performance?’ Academy of Management Journal, 49 (5), 894–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. (1996). Research Methodology. Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, R. and Hol, A. (2007). ‘Challenges of eCollaboration among SMEs’. Bled eConference: Merging and Emerging Technologies, Processes, and Institutions, Bled, Slovenia. June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J. and Bunker, B. B. (1996). ‘Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships’, (pp. 114–39 ). In Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R. (eds) Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C. and Davis, J. H. (1995). ‘An integration model of organizational trust’. The Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 709–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A. K. (1996). ‘Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust’, (pp. 261–87 ). In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (eds) Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1999). Inter-firm Alliances: Analysis and Design. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1997). Information Technology Diffusion Policies for SMEs. OECD: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P. A. and Ratnasingam, P. (2003a). ‘Technology trust in internet-based interorganisational electronic commerce’. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 1 (1), 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P. A and Ratnasingam, P. (2003b). ‘Technology trust in B2B electronic commerce: Concepts and foundations’ (pp. 200–15). In K. Kangas (ed.) Business Strategies for Information Technology Management. Hershey, PA: IRM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnasingam, P. (2003). ‘Inter-Organizational Trust for Business to Business Electronic Commerce’, Idea Group, Hershey: IRM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnasingam, P. (2005). ‘Trust in inter-organisational exchanges: A case study in business to business electronic commerce’. Decision Support Systems, 39 (3), 525–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M. C., Dewit, O. and Benoit, A. A. (2001). ‘The impact of interface usability on trust in web retailers’. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11 (5), 388–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M. and Helper, S. (1998). ‘Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States’. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 34 (3), 387–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif, K. J., Kalafatis, S. P. and Samouel, P. (2005). ‘Cognitive and behavioural determinants of trust in small and medium-sized enterprises’. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12 (3), 409–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, C. and Meister, D. B. (2004). ‘Small business growth and internal transparency: The role of information systems’. MIS Quarterly, 28 (3), 473–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, A. (2002). ‘E-collaboration: Build trust and success’. Industrial Distribution, 91 (6), 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakola, M. and Wilson, I. (2004). ‘The challenge of virtual organisation: Critical success factors in dealing with constant change’. Team Performance Management, 10 (5/6) 112–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, K., Riemer, K. and Schneider, B. (2001). Roles and Trust in Interorganizational Systems. Proceedings of the Eighth Research Symposium on Emerging Electronic Markets (RSEEM01), Maastricht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1993). ‘Calculativeness, trust and economic organization’. Journal of Law and Economics, 36 (4), 453–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1985). ‘The Economic Institutions of Capitalism’. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. J. (2002). ‘The antecedents and consequences of trust in online-purchase decisions’. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16 (920), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1986). ‘Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure 1840–1920’. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 8 (1), 53–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Lois Burgess, Belinda Parrish, Michael Jones and Lorenzo Seritti

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burgess, L., Parrish, B., Jones, M., Seritti, L. (2012). Exploring the Determinants and Dimensionality of SME e-Collaboration Trust. In: Davila, A., Elvira, M.M., Ramirez, J., Zapata-Cantu, L. (eds) Understanding Organizations in Complex, Emergent and Uncertain Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026088_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics