Skip to main content

Engaging Small Businesses in Innovation: Building Absorptive Capacity through ‘R&D Clubs’

  • Chapter
  • 365 Accesses

Summary

Small businesses in Australia tend to perform poorly on R&D and innovation, due to limitations on their absorptive capacity and a lack of resources. Network organizations, such as ‘R&D clubs’, are one means through which the absorptive capacity and innovation capability of small businesses can be improved. Such clubs can assist member firms with new knowledge exploration and new knowledge exploitation, the key elements of a strategic innovation capability. Five case studies of R&D clubs in Australia are examined with a focus on their approaches to developing the innovation capabilities of their members. The network organizations studied offer a medium to facilitate the development of social capital among their participants, and this increases the diffusion of information, creates higher levels of trust, encourages cooperative behaviour and facilitates learning and innovation. Industry members of each of the clubs have different levels of innovation capability, ranging from ‘unaware/passive’ to ‘strategic’ approaches to innovation, and this is reflected in the conditions for collaboration and the types of research project pursued. In building the absorptive capacity and innovation capability of their members, all of the case study clubs adopted ‘broadcast’ methods to raise awareness, offered ‘agent-assisted’ mechanisms to help members assimilate and exploit new knowledge, and provided ‘peer-assisted’ opportunities to learn about innovation and its benefits. The case study findings emphasize the importance of linkages and agents in helping to build the absorptive capacity of network members, and show how social capital underpins ‘peer-assisted’ capacity-building approaches. While ‘e-Collaboration’ has more recently been advocated as a key means to improve the performance of smaller firms, we conclude that direct social interaction is necessary to build effective communication, common understandings, resilient trust and the interpersonal relationships that facilitate the sharing of information and organizational learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AMAus Advanced Manufacturing Australia (2009). About Advanced Manufacturing Australia — Further Information About AMAus, viewed 30 November 2009, http://www.amaus.com.au/pages/about_tag

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2007). Research and Experimental Development, Businesses, 2005–2006 (8104.0). Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008). Innovation in Australian Business 2006–2007 (8158.0). Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, R. C. and Couchman, P. K. (2010). ‘Join the club: Entrepreneurial SMEs and collaborative R&D networks’, pp. 189–209. In P. Singh and S. Verma (eds) Organizing and Managing in the Era of Globalization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, R. C. and Gould, R. (2009). Mapping the Innovation Space Characteristics of Some Australian Manufacturing SMEs. Proceedings of the 7th Operations, Supply Chain and Services Management Symposium, 8–10 June, Adelaide, Australia (ISBN 978–0–9806179–3–1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J., Tsekouras, G. and Rush, H. (2009). Getting the Tail to Wag–Developing Innovation Capability in SMEs. Proceedings of the 10th International Continuous Innovation Network (CINet) Conference, 6–8 September, Brisbane, Australia (ISBN 978–90–77360–12–5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemens, W. G. (1992). Managing Innovation Within Networks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouty, I. (2000). ‘Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries’. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (1), 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new per-spective on learning and innovation’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperative Research Centre for Intelligent Manufacturing Systems and echnologies (2009). Annual Report 1998–1999. Preston: CRC-IMST Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daghfous, A. (2004). ‘Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices’. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 69 (2), 21–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. and Baburoglu, O. (2000). ‘From competition to collaboration: The emergence and evolution of R&D collaboratives’, pp. 173–92. In D. Faulkner and M. de Rond (eds) Perspectives on Cooperation: Confronting Complexity in Interorganizational Collaborations. London: SHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M. and Nicolini, D. (2000). ‘Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future’. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783–96..

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A. (2000). ‘Dynamic capabilities: What are they?’ Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10/11), 1105–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M. J. and Roberts, B. H. (2003). ‘Regional clustering in Australia’, pp. 67–88. In I. Marsh (ed.) Australia’s Choices: Options for a Prosperous and Fair Society. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freel, M. S. (1999). ‘Where are the skills gaps in innovative small firms?’ International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 5 (3), 144–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). ‘The strength of weak ties’. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1983). ‘The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited’. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillani, E (2005). ‘Cluster absorptive capacity: Why do some clusters forge ahead and others lag behind?’. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12 (3), 269–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000). ‘Strategic networks’. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 203–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H. (1987). Industrial Technological Development: A Network Approach. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J. (2009). ‘Improving tacit knowledge transfer within SMEs through e-collaboration’. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33 (3), 215–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, M. and Mothe, C. (1998). ‘How to learn in R&D partnerships?’ R&D Management, 28 (4), 249–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N. and Nosek, J. (2005). ‘Expanding the boundaries of e-collaboration’. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48 (1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N., Davison, R., Ocker, R. and Wazlawick, R. (2001). ‘E-collaboration: A look at past research and future challenges’. Journal of Systems & Information Technology, 5 (1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. (1995). ‘An integrative model of organizational trust’. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 709–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). ‘Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations’. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1), 24–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). ‘Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage’. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 242–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R. (2004). ‘R&D collaboration by SMEs: New opportunities and limitations in the face of globalization’. Technovation, 24 (2), 153–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi, S. and Keen, P. (2005). ‘Activating knowledge through electronic collaboration: Vanquishing the knowledge paradox’. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48 (1), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T. (2005). Absorptive Capacity–One Size Fits All? A Firm-level Analysis of Absorptive Capacity for Different Kinds of Knowledge. Discussion Paper No. 05–72. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997). ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorova, G. and Durisin, B. (2007). ‘Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization’. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 774–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., McEvily, B. and Perrone, V. (1998). ‘Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance’. Organization Science, 9 (2), 141–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. and George, G. (2002). ‘Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualizaton and extension’. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Paul K. Couchman and Ronald C. Beckett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Couchman, P.K., Beckett, R.C. (2012). Engaging Small Businesses in Innovation: Building Absorptive Capacity through ‘R&D Clubs’. In: Davila, A., Elvira, M.M., Ramirez, J., Zapata-Cantu, L. (eds) Understanding Organizations in Complex, Emergent and Uncertain Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026088_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics