Abstract
Thus far I have showed how the military manages religious diversity in accordance with US law, traditional American values, Department of Defense policy, and the need to maintain a Chaplain Corps that can’t be challenged on establishment grounds. I have also explained how chaplains can exert their agency within this institutional and cultural framework to facilitate and sometimes limit the free exercise of religion. The previous chapter described how two specific religious traditions, Islam and Wicca, fare in the military. I concluded that it’s probably easier for Muslims to have their religious needs met because they are easier for chaplains to anticipate, because Islam resembles Christianity more than Wicca does, and because no one contests that Islam is the kind of thing that has free exercise rights, a religion. This chapter is more directly about the chaplains themselves. How do the chaplains feel about religious diversity? How pluralistic can the military make its chaplains be? How are the chaplains’ selfconception, theological outlook, and relationships with religious “others” affected by the increasing religious diversity they encounter?
We’re not members of some homogeneous civil religion in which we’re all crushed together. Instead, like a magnet, part of us connects to each other, and part of us most certainly does not.
—Reformed Episcopalian chaplain
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Anne C. Loveland, American Evangelicals in the U.S. Military 1942–1993 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1996).
Richard G. Hutcheson, The Churches and the Chaplaincy, rev. ed. (Washington, DC: United States Department of Defense, 1997.)
See R. Stephen Warner, “Work in Progress toward a New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States,” American Journal of Sociology 98, no. 5 (March 1993): 1,044–93.
Wade Clark Roof, “Religion and Spirituality: Toward an Integrated Analysis,” in Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, ed. Michelle Dillon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Milton J. Coulter, John M. Mulder, and Louis B. Weeks, Vital Signs: The Promise of Mainstream Protestantism (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerd-mans, 1996).
On risk factors for domestic violence, see Julie C. Clark and Stephen C. Messer, “Intimate Partner Violence in the U.S. Military: Rates, Risks and Responses,” in Military Life: The Psychology of Serving in Peace and Combat vol. 3, The Military Family, ed. Castro et al. (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2006).
Israel Drazin and Cecil B. Currey, For God and Country: The History of a Constitutional Challenge to the Army Chaplaincy (Hoboken, NJ: KTAV Publishing House, 1995).
For a good overview of relevant legal concepts and principles, including excessive entanglement and the Lemon Test, see Thomas C. Berg, The State and Religion: In a Nutshell (St. Paul, MN: Thomson West, 2004).
See both editions of Hutcheson, Churches and the Chaplaincy (Washington, DC: United States Department of Defense, 1997; and Atlanta: John Knox, 1975).
Hutcheson, Churches and the Chaplaincy (1997).
Will Herberg, Protestant, Catholic, Jew: An Essay on American Religious Sociology (New York: Doubleday, 1955).
Nancy Tatom Ammerman, Bible Believers: Fundamentalists in the Modern World (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1987).
Copyright information
© 2012 Kim Philip Hansen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hansen, K.P. (2012). Military Chaplains’ Experiences with Diversity. In: Military Chaplains and Religious Diversity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025166_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025166_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43879-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02516-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)