Skip to main content

Accommodating and Limiting Religion in the Military

  • Chapter
Military Chaplains and Religious Diversity
  • 112 Accesses

Abstract

You don’t lose your right to free exercise of religion when you enlist. A Department of Defense directive acknowledges that it “places a high value on the rights of members of the Military Services to observe the tenets of their respective religions” and proposes some guidelines as to how the religious needs of military personnel should be met,2 and a Navy Instruction recognizes that “religion can be as integral to a person’s identity as one’s race or sex.”3 Both stipulate that because military commanders operate in such different settings and have such different missions, decisions about accommodating free exercise must be considered individually and made locally. Defense policy assumes that religious particularity can be helpful for the military because it is easier to recruit and retain when individuals’ deepest value commitments are acknowledged and respected. Showcasing respect for religious freedom is also considered good public relations, as the military represents the United States internationally.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

—First Amendment to the United States Constitution1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Alan Wolfe’s One Nation after All (New York: Penguin, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert D. Putnam and David E. Campbell provide ample evidence of American religious toleration in American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richard G. Hutcheson, The Churches and the Chaplaincy, rev. ed. (Washington, DC: United States Department of Defense, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The quotes and discussion of this matter are drawn from Israel Drazin and Cecil B. Currey, For God and Country: The History of a Constitutional Challenge to the Army Chaplaincy (Hoboken, NJ: KTAV, 1995). Both authors participated in the litigation on the Army’s side. Mr. Currey also shared his experience with me at a military chaplains’ conference. The case, Katcoff v. Marsh [755 F. 2d. 223 (2nd Cir. 1985)],

    Google Scholar 

  5. is also described in John T. Noonan and Edward McGlynn Gaffney Jr., Religious Freedom: History, Cases, and other Materials on the Interaction of Religion and Government (New York: Foundation Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mickey R. Dansby, James B. Stewart, and Schuyler C. Webb, eds., Managing Diversity in the Military: Research Perspectives from the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Although both facilitation and good order and discipline are recurring terms in publications and policies about military chaplaincy, and chaplains use the terms frequently themselves, they are not necessarily paired this way. I do so for analytical purposes. As central terms in discourse about military chaplaincy, the paired commitments to freedom and order frame what Robert Wuthnow calls “an identifiable pattern in the symbolic-expressive dimension of social life.” See Wuthnow, The Restructuring of American Religion (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The case was 417 U.S. 733, cited in Carlos C. Huerta and Schuyler C. Webb, “Religious Accommodation in the Military,” in Managing Diversity in the Military: Research Perspectives from the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute, eds. Dansby, Stewart, and Webb (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Some Wiccans worship communally in covens; others practice witchcraft alone. See Helen Berger’s A Community of Witches: Contemporary Neo-Paganism and Witchcraft in the United States (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erving Goffman, Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates (New York: Anchor Books, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton, Meaning and Modernity: Religion Polity, and Self (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Kim Philip Hansen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hansen, K.P. (2012). Accommodating and Limiting Religion in the Military. In: Military Chaplains and Religious Diversity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025166_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics