Abstract
Elimination and/or correction have been the primary social response to disabled people in modernity. The primary form of experience (of disability), during the same period, has been one of invalidation. Invalidation carries a ‘dual meaning’ as both ‘confinement through incapacity’ and ‘deficit of credibility’ (Hughes, 2000: 558). This (latter and more crucial) claim is based on the view that in the non-disabled imaginary disability is an ‘ontological deficit’ – a reduction of ‘leib’ to ‘korpor’, human to animal, subjectivity to flesh, identity to excessive corporeal presence. It is this deficit of credibility that provides the spurious rationale for the disposal of disabled bodies by means of elimination (inter alia extermination or segregation) or correction (inter alia sterilisation or rehabilitation). These are the social practices that have been used to erase both the psychological aversion and the problematic social difference that disability has come to represent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agamben, G. (2004). The Open: Man and Animal (translated by Kevin Attell). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Bataille, G. (1985). Visions of Excess: Selected Writings 1927–39, trans. A. Stoekl, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bauman, Z. (1979). 'The Phenomenon of Norbert Elias'. Sociology, 13, 117–25.
Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Oxford: Polity.
Bell, A. and McMellie, A. (eds) (1982). The Diary of Virginia Woolf. New York: Harcourt.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Canguilhem, G. (1991). The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.
Campbell, F. A. K. (2001). 'Inciting Legal Fictions: Disability's Date with Ontology and the Ableist Body of Law'. Griffith Law Review 10 (1), 42–61.
the Ableist Body of Law'. Griffith Law Review 10 (1), 42–61. Campbell, F. A. K. (2008). 'Exploring Internalised Ableism Using Critical Race Theory'. Disability & Society, 23 (2), 151–62.
Davis, L. (1995). Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness and the Body. London: Verso.
Davis, L. (2000). 'Dr Johnston, Amelia and the Discourse of Disability'. In H. Deutsch and F. Nussbaum (eds), Defects: Engendering the Modern Body. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Deutsch, H. and Nussbaum, F. (eds) (2000). Defects: Engendering the Modern Body. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Douglas, M. (1991). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.
Elias, N. (2000). The Civilising Process. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fiedler, L. (1978). Freaks: Myths and Images of the Secret Self. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Garland-Thomson, D. (1995). The Eye of the Beholder: Deformity and Disability in the Graeco-Roman World. Ithica, New York: Cornell University Press.
Garland-Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
Goffman, E. (1969). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Heidegger, M. (1993). Letter on humanism. In D. Farell Krell (ed.), Basic Writings. London: Harper Collins.
Heidegger, M. (1995). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics (translated by W. McNeil and N. Walker). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hahn, H. (1986). 'Public Support for Rehabilitation Programmes: The Analysis of US Disability Policy'. Disability, Handicap and Society, 1 (2), 25–38.
Hughes, B. (1999). 'The Constitution of Impairment: Modernity and the Aesthetic of Oppression'. Disability & Society, 14 (2), 155–72.
Hughes, B. (2000). 'Medicine and the Aesthetic Invalidation of Disabled People'. Disability & Society, 15 (4), 555–68.
Hughes, B. (2002). 'Bauman's Strangers: Disability, Impairment and the Cultures of Modernity and Postmodernity'. Disability & Society, 17 (5), 571–84.
Hughes, B. (2007). 'Being Disabled: Towards a Critical Social Ontology for Disability Studies'. Disability & Society, 22 (7), 673–84.
Kaplan, C. (2000). 'Liberalism, Feminism and Defect'. In H. Deutsch and F. Nussbaum (eds), Defects: Engendering the Modern Body. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kolnai, A. (2004). On Disgust. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection (translated by L. Roudiez). New York: Columbia University Press.
Miller, W. (1997). Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Mitchell, D. and Snyder, S. (2000). Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2004). Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Park, K. and Daston, L. (1981). 'Unnatural Conceptions: The Study of Monsters in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century France and England'. Past and Present, 92, 51–73.
Paterson, K. and Hughes, B. (1999). 'Disability Studies and Phenomenology: The Carnal Politics of Everyday Life'. Disability & Society, 14 (5), 597–610.
Pernick, M. (1997). 'Defining the Defective - Eugenics, Aesthetics and Mass Culture in Early Twentieth Century America'. In D. Mitchell and S. Snyder (eds), The Body and Physical Difference. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Preistley, M. (2003). Disability: A Life Course Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Reave, D. (2008). 'Biopolitics and Bare Life: Does the Impaired Body Provide Contemporary Examples of Homo Sacer'. In K. Kristiansen, T. Shakespeare and S. Vehmas (eds), Arguing about Disability: Philosophical Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Rozin, P. and Fallon, A. (1987). 'A Perspective on Disgust'. Psychological Review, 94, 23–41.
Shildrick, M. (1997). Leaky Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)Ethics. London: Routledge.
Shildrick, M. (2002). Embodying the Monster: Encounters with the Vulnerable Self. London: Sage.
Stainton, T. (2008). 'Reason, Grace and Charity: Augustine and the Impact of Church Doctrine on the Construction of Intellectual Disability'. Disability & Society, 23 (5), 485–96.
Stiker, J. H. (2000). A History of Disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Winance, M. (2007). 'Being Normally Different? Changes to Normalisation Processes: From Alignment to Work on the Norm'. Disability & Society, 22 (6), 625–38.
Winzer, M. (1997). 'Disability and Society before the 18th Century: Dread and Despair'. In L. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, 75–109.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Bill Hughes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, B. (2012). Civilising Modernity and the Ontological Invalidation of Disabled People. In: Goodley, D., Hughes, B., Davis, L. (eds) Disability and Social Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023001_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023001_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31823-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02300-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)