Abstract
Decolonizing literary strategies, while on the one hand seeking to raise the awareness of the colonized, on the other hand try to counteract the colonizer’s claims and to subvert the colonizer’s imperializing methods.’ “Just like the strategy of subverting the master’s genre and language, the critical twinning of biblical and indigenous religious stories is an anti-imperial decolonizing method. Imperialism took the form of destroying people’s languages, history, dances, education, religions, naming systems, and other social institutions that were the basis of their self conception.”2 As a postcolonial African feminist biblical scholar, Musa W. Dube identifies biblical texts as propounding “values that are compatible with imperialistic tendencies. Historical evidence of modern imperialism thus categorizes the biblical texts as imperializing texts: texts that authorize the imposition of foreign institutions on one nation by another.”3 It is appropriate to ask two questions to the Ephesian passage, 5:21–33, in light of the methodology suggested by Dube: Does the Ephesian passage have a clear stance against the political imperialism of its time? and Does the Ephesian passage employ gender and divine representations to construct relationships of subordination and domination?4
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Musa W. Dube, Postcolonial Feminist Interpretation of the Bible (St. Louis, MI: Chalice Press, 2000), 103.
Carolyn Osiek and Margaret Y. MacDonald with Janet H. Tulloch, A Woman’s Place: House Churches in Earliest Christianity (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2006), 119–120.
Von Harnack cited by Ernst Best, Essays in Ephesians (Edinburgh, UK: T & T Clark, 1997), 14.
David Joy, Revelation: A Post-Colonial View Point (Delhi: ISPCK, 2001), 7–10.
Pheme Perkins, Ephesians: Abingdon New Testament Commentaries (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1997), 51; Jennifer G. Bird, Ephesians, 267.
D. Noy cited by Beryl Rawson, “‘The Roman Family’ in Recent Research: State of the Question,” Biblical Interpretation 11, no. 2 (2003): 131.
Brian J. Walsh and Sylvia C. Keesmaat, Colossians Remixed. Subverting the Empire (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004), 61.
Margaret MacDonald, “The Politics of Identity in Ephesians,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 26 (2004): 422.
Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin, Key Concepts in Post-Colonial Studies (London and New York: Routledge, 2004), 118.
Elisabeth Schussler Fiorenza, Bread Not Stone: The Challenge of Feminist Biblical Interpretation (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1985), 74–77.
Daniel Mark Cere cited by John Paul II, On the Dignity and Vocation of Women (Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference, 1988), 9.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 David Joy and Joseph F. Duggan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lalitha, J. (2012). Decolonizing Marital Gender Norms in Eph. 5:21–33. In: Joy, D., Duggan, J.F. (eds) Decolonizing the Body of Christ. Postcolonialism and Religions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137021038_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137021038_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43405-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02103-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)