Abstract
Ajay Heble, in Landing on the Wrong Note — as if there were such a thing as a wrong note in Heble’s universe — has written the following lines: ‘Art …, does not simply reflect external reality; rather it plays a formative role in the constitution of social life, in the ways in which people take responsibility for creating their own histories, for participating in the management of their own social and political realities’. Zooming in on his subject matter, jazz, Heble ‘postulate[s] a theory of musical dissonance as social practice’ appearing in conjunction with ‘social and political dissonance’.1 I wish to apply the concept of dissonance, decoupled from music and understood broadly as ‘disagreeing, discordant, different, in any respect’2 to visual images and argue that images, rather than simply reflecting external reality, play a crucial role in the constitution of social life. I would like to understand visual dissonance as social practice linked with social and political dissonance, and I would like to see the transformation of spectators into participant witnesses as an important step towards such dissonance. I wish to emphasize what Michael Shapiro calls photography’s ‘capacity to disclose and demystify’ without ignoring that there is no guarantee that photography discloses and demystifies in fact.3 I want to stress that photography’s visual traces can be read progressively without ignoring that there is no guarantee that they are being read progressively in fact.4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ajay Heble, Landing on the Wrong Note: Jazz, Dissonance and Critical Practice (New York and London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 78, 170.
Entry ‘Dissonant’, The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principals, Vol. 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973), p. 579.
Michael J. Shapiro The Politics of Representation: Writing Practices in Biography, Photography and Policy Analysis (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1988), p. 126.
Jae Emerling, Photography: History and Theory (London and New York: Routledge, 2012), p. 140.
Jacques Rancière, The Emancipated Spectator, trans. G. Elliott (London and New York: Verso, 2009), p. 27.
David MacDougall, Transcultural Cinema. Edited and with an introduction by Lucien Taylor (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998), p. 68.
Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, trans. R. Howard (London: Vintage Books, 2000), pp. 27–8.
Susan Sontag, Regarding the Pain of Others (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003), p. 103.
Frank Möller, ‘Associates in Crime and Guilt’, in A. Grønstad and H. Gustafsson (eds), Ethics and Images of Pain (New York: Routledge, 2012), p. 27.
Nicholas Mirzoeff, The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2011).
Roland Barthes, ‘Rhetoric of the Image’, in R. Barthes, Image Music Text. Essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath (London: Fontana Press, 1977), p. 40.
Art Spiegelman, Metamaus (London: Viking, 2011);
Jonathan Torgovnik, Intended Consequences: Rwandan Children Born of Rape (New York: Aperture, 2009).
Alejandro Zambra, Ways of Going Home, trans. M. McDowell (London: Granta Books, 2013), p. 125.
Jenny Edkins, ‘Exposed Singularity’, Journal for Cultural Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, October 2005, p. 374.
See Frank Möller, ‘Shades of White: An Essay on a Political Iconography of the North’, in F. Möller and S. Pehkonen (eds), Encountering the North: Cultural Geography, International Relations and Northern Landscapes (Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate, 2003), p. 63.
James Elkins, What Photography Is (London and New York: Routledge, 2011), p. 173.
See Frank Möller, ‘Photography after Empire: Citizen-photographers or Snappers on Autopilot’, New Political Science, Vol. 32, No. 4, December 2010, pp. 509–12.
Debbie Lisle, ‘The Surprising Detritus of Leisure: Encountering the Late Photography of War’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 29, 2011, pp. 875–6.
Ernst Van Alphen, Art in Mind: How Contemporary Images Shape Thought (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2005).
Innocent Rwililiza, as quoted in Jean Hatzfeld, The Strategy of Antelopes: Living in Rwanda After the Genocide (London: Serpent’s Tail, 2009), p. 100.
See, respectively, Fred Ritchin, In Our Own Image (New York: Aperture, 1999), p. 27, and After Photography (London: W.W. Norton, 2009), p. 127.
Diana Taylor, The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2003), p. 276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Frank Möller
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Möller, F. (2013). Unfinished Business. In: Visual Peace. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137020406_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137020406_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43749-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02040-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)