Skip to main content

From Independence to Trialism: The Croatian Party of Right and the Project for a Liberal “Greater Croatia” within the Habsburg Empire, 1861–1914

  • Chapter
Liberal Imperialism in Europe

Abstract

During the twentieth century, the political term “Frankist” carried a distinctly negative connotation in both Croatian politics and historiography, and continues to do so in some quarters due to its popular association with anti-Yugoslav and/or anti-Serbian Croatian nationalists, including the pro-Nazi Ustasha regime.1 The term itself derived from the surname of Josip Frank (1844–1911), the leader of the Pure Party of Right (Čista stranka prava, ČSP), which was the successor to the earlier Croatian Party of Right (Hrvatska stranka prava, HSP), founded by Ante Starčević (1823–1896) in 1861. More precisely, the term refers to the followers of Josip Frank and is accepted as such in contemporary Croatian historiography.2 Non-Croatian historians have traditionally viewed both Starčević and Frank as the ideological progenitors of extreme Croatian nationalism, including the Ustashe.3 Although the Ustasha regime did indeed regard Ante Starčević as the father of the modern Croatian nation, they rejected the political legacy of Frank because he was a Jewish convert to Catholicism, and it would be quite wrong to construct a peculiar Croat ideological Sonderweg running directly from Starčević, via Frank, to Ante Pavelić (1889–1959). The history of the Croatian Party of Right is instead a highly complex one involving a peculiar mix of political ideas including liberalism, pre-modern historic state right, modern Croat nationalism, Habsburg legitimism, and Realpolitik.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example, Srdjan Trifković, “Yugoslavia in Crisis: Europe and the Croat Question, 1939–41,” European History Quarterly, 23, 1993, 531.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stjepan Matković, “Members of the Party of Right and the Idea of the Croat State during the First World War,” Review of Croatian History, 4(1), 2008, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aleksa Djilas accused Starčević of being “the progenitor of extreme Croatian nationalism, which sought to suppress and perhaps even to exterminate all those who had a different national consciousness.” See Aleksa Djilas, The Contested Country: Yugoslav Unity and Communist Revolution 1919–1953 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991), pp. 106–107. For similar views, see

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cathie Carmichael, Ethnic Cleansing in the Balkans: Nationalism and the Destruction of Tradition (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 57–58;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Srdjan Trifković, “The First Yugoslavia and Origins of Croatian Separatism,” East European Quarterly, XXVI(3), September 1992, 365; and

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rory Yeomans, “Of ‘Yugoslav Barbarians’ and Croatian Gentlemen Scholars: Nationalist Ideology and Racial Anthropology in Interwar Yugoslavia,” in Marius Turda and Paul J. Weindling (eds.), Blood and Homeland: Eugenics and Racial Nationalism in Central and Southeast Europe 1900–1940 (Budapest: CEU Press, 2007), p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Branka Magaš, Croatia Through History: The Making of a European State (London: Saqi, 2007), p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peter E Sugar, “External and Domestic Roots of Eastern European Nationalism,” in Peter F. Sugar and Ivo J. Lederer (eds.), Nationalism in Eastern Europe (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1969), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Turkish Croatia” (present day north-west Bosnia) and “Turkish Dalmatia” (present day western Herzegovina) extended to the rivers Vrbas and the Neretva, respectively. See Nikša Stančić, Hrvatska nacija i nacionalizam u 19. i 20. stoljeću (Zagreb: Barbat, 2002), pp. 95–96.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elinor Murray Despalatovic, Ljudevit Gaj and the Illyrian Movement (New York: Columbia University Press, 1975), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nikša Stančić, “Između političkog nacionalizma i etnonacionalizma: Od hrvatske staleške ‘nacije’ (natio croatica) do hrvatskoga ‘političkog naroda’”, in Tihomir Cipek and Josip Vrandečić (eds.), Nacija i nacionalizam u hrvatskoj povijesnoj tradiciji (Zagreb: Alinea, 2007), p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Illyrian pan-Slavism was influenced by both the long intellectual tradition of Croat pan-Slavism (dating from the Renaissance) and by the founders of modern cultural pan-Slavism, the Slovak poet Ján Kollár and the Slovak scholar Pavel Josif Šafárík. See Wayne S. Vucinich, “Croatian Illyrism: Its Background and Genesis,” in Stanley B. Winters and Joseph Held (eds.), Intellectual and Social Developments in the Habsburg Empire from Maria Theresa to World War I (New York: Columbia University Press, 1975), pp. 55, 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Mirjana Gross, “On the Integration of the Croatian Nation: A Case Study in Nation Building,” East European Quarterly, XV(2), June 1981, 215.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Duško Sekulić, “Civic and Ethnic Identity: The Case of Croatia,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(3), May 2004, 463. Also see Gross, “On the Integration of the Croatian Nation,” 209–225;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miroslav Hroch, “Nationalism and National Movements: Comparing the Past and Present of Central Europe and Eastern Europe,” Nations and Nationalism, 2(1), 1996, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. See Rogers Brubaker, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1992), pp. 3–10. For a critique of Brubaker’s distinction between French and German notions of citizenship and nationalism, see

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dieter Gosewinkel, “Citizenship in Germany and France at the Turn of the Twentieth Century: Some New Observations on an Old Comparison,” in Geoff Eley and Jan Palmowski (eds.), Citizenship and National Identity in Twentieth Century Germany (California: Stanford University Press, 2008), pp. 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ivo J. Lederer, “Nationalism and the Yugoslavs,” in Peter F. Sugar and Ivo J. Lederer (eds.), Nationalism in Eastern Europe (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1969), p. 410.

    Google Scholar 

  19. As Ivo Banac notes, “the Illyrianist solutions were so heavily dependent upon Croat national and cultural traditions that they failed to attract the other South Slavs—who of course had no particular interest in Croat literary monuments, notably the heritage of Dubrovnik, nor in the defense of Croatia’s municipal autonomy.” See Ivo Banac, The National Question in Yugoslavia: Origins, History, Politics (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1984), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stjepan Matković, “Croatian and European Challenges from the 1860s to the End of the Great War (1918),” Croatian Studies Review, 5, 2008, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ibid., p. 58. Karl Marx also made several disparaging comments about the Croats in connection to the events of 1848. Both Marx and Friedrich Engels regarded the South Slavs of the Habsburg Empire as “nothing more than the ‘ethnic rubbish’ of a complicated ‘thousand-year evolution.’ ” Cited in Paul Lendvai, The Hungarians: 1000 Years of Victory in Defeat (London: Hurst & Company, 2003), p. 235.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Mario S. Spalatin, “The Croatian Nationalism of Ante Starčević, 1845–1871,” Croatian Studies Journal, 16, 1975, 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tihomir Cipek, “Nacija kao izvor političkog legitimiteta,” in Tihomir Cipek and Josip Vrandečić (eds.), Nacija i nacionalizam u hrvatskoj povijesnoj tradiciji (Zagreb: Alinea, 2007), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mirjana Gross, Izvorno pravaštvo: Ideologija, agitacija, pokret (Zagreb: Golden marketing, 2000), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jasna Turkalj, “Prilog istraživanju pravaškog pokreta 1880-ih,” in Jasna Turkalj, Zlatko Matijević, and Stjepan Matković (eds.), Pravaška misao i politika: Zbornik radova (Zagreb: Hrvatski institut za povijest, 2007), pp. 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mark Biondich, “Religion and Nation in Wartime Croatia: Reflections on the Ustaša Policy of Forced Religious Conversions, 1941–1942,” Slavonic and East European Review, 83(1), January 2005, p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nicholas J. Miller, Between Nation and State: Serbian Politics in Croatia Before the First World War (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997), pp. 30, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ante Starčević, “Bi-li k Slavstvu ili ka Hrvatstvu?: Dva razgovora,” in Josip Bratulić (ed.), Djela dra. Ante Starčevića: Znanstveno-političke razprave, 1894–1896 (Varaždin: Inačica, 1995), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mirjana Gross, “Croatian National-Integrational Ideologies from the End of Illyrism to the Creation of Yugoslavia,” Austrian History Yearbook, 15–16, 1979–1980, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. James Bukowski, “Yugoslavism and the Croatian National Party in 1867,” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism, 3(1), 1975, 73–74.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zlatko Hasanbegović, “Islam i muslimani u pravaškoj ideologiji: O pokušaju gradnje ‘pravaške džamije’ u Zagrebu 1908,” in Jasna Turkalj, Zlatko Matijević and Stjepan Matković (ed.), Pravaška misao i politika: Zbornik radova (Zagreb: Hrvatski institut za povijest, 2007), p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Hasanbegović, “Islam i muslimani u pravaşkoj ideologiji,” p. 88; Robert J. Rohrbacher, “Bishop J. J. Strossmayer’s Yugoslavism in the Light of the Eastern Crisis of 1875–1878,” East European Quarterly, XXXV(3), September 2001, 354.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Antun Gustav Matoš, Feltoni i eseji (Zagreb: Naklada “Juga,” 1917), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Charles Jelavich, South Slav Nationalisms: Textbooks and Yugoslav Union Before 1914 (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1990), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stjepan Matković, Čista stranka prava 1895–1903 (Zagreb: Hrvatski institut za povijest, 2001), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. J. P. Taylor, The Habsburg Monarchy 1809–1918: A History of the Austrian Empire and Austria-Hungary (London: Penguin Books, 1990), pp. 172, 231.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stjepan Matković, “Između starog i modernog pravaştva,” in Jasna Turkalj, Zlatko Matijević, Stjepan Matković (eds.), Pravaşka misao i politika: Zbornik radova (Zagreb: Hrvatski institut za povijest, 2007), pp. 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jure Krišto, “Kad pravaşi pođu različitim putovima: Frano Supilo i Josip Frank o ‘novom kursu,’” in Jasna Turkalj, Zlatko Matijević and Stjepan Matković (eds.), Pravaška misao i politika: Zbornik radova (Zagreb: Hrvatski institut za povijest, 2007), p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mario Strecha, “Politički katolicizam i politika ‘novog kursa’: Skupina oko Hrvatstva u borbi protiv politike ‘novoga kursa’ u razdoblju vladavine Hrvatskosrpske koalicije,” Radovi—Zavod za hrvatsku povijest, 39, 2007, pp. 168–174.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Marko Trogrlić, “Hrvatska i ‘Hrvatsko pitanje’ u korespondenciji Josipa Franka i Moritza von Auffenberg-Komarówa (1908–1910),” in Jasna Turkalj, Zlatko Matijević and Stjepan Matković (eds.), Pravaška misao i politika: Zbornik radova (Zagreb: Hrvatski institut za povijest, 2007), pp. 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Matthew P. Fitzpatrick

Copyright information

© 2012 Matthew P. Fitzpatrick

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartulin, N. (2012). From Independence to Trialism: The Croatian Party of Right and the Project for a Liberal “Greater Croatia” within the Habsburg Empire, 1861–1914. In: Fitzpatrick, M.P. (eds) Liberal Imperialism in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137019974_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137019974_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43739-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01997-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics