Skip to main content

A Tale of Two Innovations: Motivational Interviewing and Core Correctional Practices in United States Probation

  • Chapter
What Works in Offender Compliance

Abstract

The recent past in community supervision has witnessed the introduction of a number of new innovations intended to improve offender outcomes. While many of these innovations have focused on various ‘programs’, more recently the focus has shifted to officer supervision skills and their impact on outcomes. This chapter focuses on two broad officer skill sets, motivational interviewing and what has come to be known as core correctional practices. The chapter discusses the efforts of the United States probation system in implementing these skill sets, with a focus on how the implementation process may impact fidelity to the intervention and subsequent offender outcomes. Over a three-year period several hundred probation officers were trained in motivational interviewing (MI). While initial training was fairly standard, there was considerable variability in follow-up training, coaching and implementation practices. Scores based on the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) manual were collected from a sample of trained officers. The MITI revealed that very few officers were actually proficient in MI. Further, the outcomes of the trained officers’ caseloads before and after training were compared with the outcomes of caseloads belonging to officers who were not trained in MI. This comparison showed no significant differences in client success. A couple of years later, probation officers were trained in core correctional practices. Officers were provided with initial training and then several structured booster sessions to ensure that they were correctly using the skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, M., Vanbenschoten, S. and Walters, S. (2008) ‘Motivational Interviewing Training in Criminal Justice: Development of a Model Plan’. Federal Probation, September 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A. and Bonta, J. (2010) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. Fifth Edition. New Providence, New Jersey: LexisNexis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A. and Kiessling, J. J. (1980) ‘Program Structure and Effective Correctional Practices. A Summary of CaVIC Research’. in R. R. Ross and P. Gendreau (Eds) Effective Correctional Treatment (pp. 441–463). Toronto: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anstiss, B., Polaschek, D. L. L. and Wilson, M. (2011) ‘A Brief Motivational Interviewing Intervention with Prisoners: When You Lead a Horse to Water, Can It Drink for Itself?’ Psychology, Crime & Law 17(8), 689–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Bourgon, G. and Yessine, A.K. (2008) ‘Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision’. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 47(3), 248–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Yessine, A., Gutierrez, L. and Li, J. (2010) The Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision: Risk, Need, Responsivity in the Real World. Corrections Research: User Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, C. and Andrews, D. A. (2004) ‘The Importance of Staff Practice in Delivering Effective Correctional Treatment: A Meta-Analytic Review of Core Correctional Practices’. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48(2), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. and Wallace, F. (2005) Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaze, L. (2010) Correctional Populations in the United States, 2009. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B. and Showers, B. (2002) Student Achievement Through Staff Development. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettema, J., Steele, J. and Miller, W. R. (2005) ‘Motivational Interviewing’. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 1, 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, Mark W. (2009) ‘The Primary Factors That Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview’. Victims & Offenders 4(2), 124–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A. and Wilson, S. J. (2007) ‘Effects of Cognitivebehavioral Programs for Criminal Offenders’. Campbell Systematic Reviews 6. DOI: 10.4073/csr.2007.6

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkamp, C., Holsinger, A., Robinson, R. and Alexander, M. (2012) ‘Diminishing or Durable Treatment Effects of STARR? A Research Note on 24-month Re-Arrest Rates’. Submitted to the Journal of Crime and Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What Works? — Questions and Answers About Prison Reform’. The Public Interest 35 (Spring), 22–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurran, M. (2009) ‘Motivational Interviewing with Offenders: A Systematic Review’. Legal and Criminological Psychology 14, 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R. and Mount, K. A. (2001) ‘A Small Study of Training in Motivational Interviewing: Does One Workshop Change Clinician and Client Behavior?’ Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 29, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R. and Moyers, T. B. (2006) ‘Eight Stages in Learning Motivational Interviewing’. Journal of Teaching in the Addictions 5, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R. and Rollnick, S. (2002) Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. Second Edition. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., Yahne, C. E., Moyers, T. B., Martinez, J. and Pirritano, M. (2004) ‘A Randomized Trial of Methods to Help Clinicians Learn Motivational Interviewing’. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 72, 1050–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyers, T. B., Martin, T., Manuel, J. K. and Miller, W. R. (2003) ‘The Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) Code’. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Corrections (2011) Motivational Interviewing (with a Criminal Justice Focus) Annotated Bibliography. Prepared by the NIC Information Center, November 2011. Accession No. 025355

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. R., Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., Vanbenschoten, S., Alexander, M. and Oleson, J. C. (2012) ‘A Random Study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-Arrest (STARR): Using Core Correctional Practices in Probation Interactions’. Journal of Crime and Justice, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of lnnovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubak, S., Sandboek, A., Lauritzen, T. and Christensen, B. (2005) ‘Motivational Interviewing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis’. British Journal of General Practice 55(513), 305–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. (2002) ‘Supervision — Exploring the Dimensions of Effectiveness’. Federal Probation 66(2), 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S., Yancey, C. and Bilanin, J. (2006) Proactive Community Supervision in Maryland: Changing Offender Outcomes. College Park: University of Maryland, Bureau of Governmental Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, C. (1996) ‘The Impact of Different Supervision Practices in Community Supervision: Cause for Optimism’. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 29(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, C. (1999) Working with Involuntary Clients: A Guide to Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. T., Matson, S. A., Baer, J. S. and Ziedonis, D. M. (2005) ‘Effectiveness of Workshop Training for Psychosocial Addiction Treatments: A Systematic Review’. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 29(4), 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. T., Vader, A. M., Nguyen, N., Harris, T. R. and Eells, J. (2010) ‘Motivational Interviewing as a Supervision Strategy in Probation: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial’. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 49(5), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Melissa Alexander, Christopher T. Lowenkamp and Charles R. Robinson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alexander, M., Lowenkamp, C.T., Robinson, C.R. (2013). A Tale of Two Innovations: Motivational Interviewing and Core Correctional Practices in United States Probation. In: Ugwudike, P., Raynor, P. (eds) What Works in Offender Compliance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137019523_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics