Abstract
Based on the framework of design-based comparative advantage, in which the dynamic fit between organizational capabilities regarding genba (manufacturing sites) and architectures of products and processes affect the competitiveness of the sites and industries, this chapter describes and analyses various issues within the world automotive industry. The current US automobile crisis is seen as a long-term consequence of the gap between the division-of-labour type capability and the integral-type architecture of small cars. Japanese competitiveness in small cars in the late twentieth century is illustrated as the fit between path-dependent accumulation of co-ordination-type organizational capability and stricter safety-energy-environmental constraints imposed on vehicles in advanced nations. The possibility of the commoditization of automobiles is discussed from the modularization point of view. The modular nature of locally-designed Chinese vehicles, as well as the integral nature of Indian low-cost vehicles, are considered. The architectural differences between purely electric and hybrid vehicles are emphasized as the chapter discusses the possibilities and limitations of the former type. Toyota’s recent recall problem, discussed later in the chapter, is seen as a problem of product complexity overwhelming the company’s organizational design capability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abernathy, W. J. (1978) The Productivity Dilemma. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K. B. (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, K. B. and Fujimoto, T. (1991) Product Development Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Fujimoto, T. (1999) The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fujimoto, T. (2006) ‘Architecture-based Comparative Advantage in Japan and Asia’, in K. Ohno and T. Fujimoto (eds), Industrialization of Developing Countries: Analysis by Japanese Economics. Tokyo: National Graduate Institute of Policy Studies, pp. 1–10.
Fujimoto, T. (2007) ‘Architecture-based Comparative Advantage: A Design Information View of Manufacturing’, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 4(1): 55–112.
Jones, G. (2005) Multinationals and Global Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacDuffie, J. P. and Fujimoto, T. (2010) ‘Why Dinosaurs Will Keep Ruling the Auto Industry’, Harvard Business Review, June: 601–3.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ricardo, D. (1971 [1819]) On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
Samuelson, P. A. (1948) ‘International Trade and the Equalization of Factor Prices’, Economic Journal, 58(230): 165–84.
Suh, N. P. (1990) The Principles of Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ulrich, K. T. (1995) ‘The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm’, Research Policy, 24(3): 419–40.
Womack, J., Jones D. T. and Roos, D. (1990) The Machine that Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Takahiro Fujimoto
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fujimoto, T. (2012). Manufacturing Capability and the Architecture of Future Vehicles. In: Calabrese, G. (eds) The Greening of the Automotive Industry. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137018908_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137018908_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35023-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01890-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)