Skip to main content

Disturbing Cultures of Incarceration: The Struggle for Normality and the Imprisoned Family

  • Chapter
Comparative Early Childhood Education Services

Part of the book series: Critical Cultural Studies of Childhood ((CCSC))

  • 774 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we examine the ways a prison-based Mother and Baby Unit (MBU) is managed as it strives to develop innovative ways of working with diverse family cultures so as to extend and consolidate family resilience and family well-being. The chapter draws on data that were collected while undertaking an evaluation of an MBU. We begin with a brief description of the methods used before offering both a succinct history of MBUs in the United Kingdom and more specific contextual details in relation to the MBU where we undertook the evaluation. Examples of data are introduced that, when read within a Foucauldian framework, foreground some of the tensions between the philosophy and practices of the MBU and the locations of prison, prisoner, mother, and child. It is by opening up these tensions that we are able to interrogate the discourses that are in circulation and in so doing make a space for renewed discussions that relate to both early childhood education as well as to what might constitute the resilient family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Arendell, T. (1999). Hegemonic motherhood: Deviancy discourses and employed mothers’ accounts of out-of-school time issues. Working Paper No. 9, April 1999 (pp. 1–30). University of California, Berkeley: Center for Working Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baca Zinn, M. (1990). Family, feminism, and race. Gender & Society, 4(1), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baca Zinn, M. (1994). Adaptation and continuity in Mexican-origin families. In R. Taylor (Ed.). Minority families in the United States: A multicultural perspective (pp. 69–94) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, K. E., & Martell, L. K. (1995). Mothering. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.). Handbook of parenting, Vol. 3: Status and social conditions of parenting (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Vandell, D., Clarke-Stewart, K. & Owen, M. T. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early childcare? Child Development, 78(2), 681–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialostok, S. (2004). Literacy and risk: An analysis of one middle-class parent’s taken-for-granted understandings of independence and freedom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4(1), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boris, E. (1994). Home to work: Motherhood and the politics of industrial homework in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I. (1992). Attachment and bonding: From ethological to representational and sociological perspectives. In V. B. Van Hasselt & M. Herson (Eds.). Handbook of social development (pp. 133–155). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Britzman, D. (2000). ‘The question of belief’: Writing poststructural ethnography. In A. St. Pierre, & W. Pillow (Eds.). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 27–40). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., Sidle-Fuligni, A., & Berlin, I. J. (Eds.). (2003). Early child development in the 21st century: Profiles of current research initiatives. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. & Jones, L. (2002). Action research and post-modernism: Congruence and critique. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (2007). Deconstructing developmental psychology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, P. J. (1998). Mother-blaming. In M. Ladd-Taylor & L. Umansky (Eds.). Bad mothers: The politics of blame in twentieth-century America (pp. 158–178). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, G. (1994). Undocumented Latinas: The new “employable mothers”. In E. Glenn, N. Glenn, G. Chang, & L. Forcey (Eds.). Mothering: Ideology, experience and agency (pp. 258–271). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1994). Shifting the center: Race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In D. Bassin., M. Honey, & M. M. Kaplan (Eds.). Representations of motherhood (pp. 56–74). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corston, J. (Baroness). (2007). Review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. Home Office. Retrieved from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/about-us/news/corston-report

  • Davies, B. (1994) Poststructuralist theory and classroom practice. Geelong, Aus.: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (1992). Inspection of facilities for mother and babies in prison. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, B. T. (1988). Our mother’s grief: Racial ethnic women and the maintenance of families. Journal of Family History, 13(1), 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillner, L. (1992). Keeping babies in prison. British Medical Journal, 304 (6832), 932–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S., & Edward, R. (1999). Lone mothers, paid work and gendered moral rationalities. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elvin-Nowak, Y., & Thomsson, H. (2001). Motherhood as idea and practice: A discursive understanding of employed mothers in Sweden. Gender and Society, 15(3), 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. (1996). The experience of young children and their incarcerated mothers: A call for humanly-responsive policy. International Journal of Early Childhood, 26(2), 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendler, F. (2001). Educating flexible souls: The construction of subjectivity through developmentality and interaction In K. Hultqvist & G. Dahlberg (Eds.). Governing the child in the new millennium (pp. 119–142). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Towards a criticism of political reason. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, delivered at Stanford University, October 10 and 16, 1979. Retrieved from http://foucault.info/documents/foucault.omnesEtSingulatim.en.html

  • Foucault, M. (2000). The subject and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.). Michel Foucault: Power 1 (pp. 303–320). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E. N. (1994). Social constructions of mothering: a thematic overview. In E. N. Glenn, G. Chang, & L. R. Forcey (Eds.). Mothering: Ideology, experience and agency (pp. 1–32). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E. N., Chang, G., & Forcey, L. R. (Eds.). (1994). Mothering: Ideology, experience and agency. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (2003). Flat broke with children: Women in the age of welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Prison Service. (2008). Female Prisoners. Retrieved from http://www.hmprisonservice.gov.uk/advicesupport/prison_life/femaleprisoner/

  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons. (HMIP). (2006). Women in prison: A literature review. London: HMIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Prison Service. (2008). Women prisoners. Prison Service Order 4800, last updated April 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Prison Service. (2009). The management of mother and baby units, Prison Service Order 4801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, R. (2010). Cinemaethnographic specta(c)torship: Discursive readings of what we choose to (dis)possess. Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies, 9 (6), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A. & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (2nd ed.). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. & Swanson, D. (2006). Constructing the “good mother”: The experience of mothering ideologies by work status. Sex Roles 54(7/8), 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochanska, G. & Askan, N. (1995). Mother-child mutually positive affect, the quality of child compliance to requests and prohibitions, and maternal control as correlates of early internalization. Child Development, 66, 236–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2000, September). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Paper presented at the Rethinking Marxism Conference, University of Amherst (MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, E. (1994). Negotiating lesbian motherhood: The dialectics of resistance and accommodation. In E. Glenn, N. Glenn, G. Chang, & L. Forcey (Eds.). Mothering: Ideology, experience and agency (pp. 333–353). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melhuish, E. (2004). Child benefits: The importance of investing in quality childcare. Facing the Future: Policy Papers. London: Day Care Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2007). The Corston report: Women in the criminal justice system. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gove.uk/publications/corston-report.htm.

  • Ministry of Justice. (2008). Mother and Baby Units in Prisons. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/mother-baby-units.pdf.

  • Owers, A. (2004). Inspection report. Retrieved from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/justice/prisons/inspprisons

  • Phoenix, A., Woollett, A., & Lloyd, E. (Eds.). (1991). Motherhood: Meanings, practices, and ideologies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. (2003). Governing the child and pedagogicalization of the parent: A historical excursus into the present. In M. Bloch, K. Holmlund, I. Moqvist, & T. Popkewtz (Eds.). Governing children, families and education (pp. 35–62). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, V., & Glaser, D. (2006) Understanding attachment and attachment disorders: Theory, evidence and practice. London and Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T., & Abma, T. (2005). The practice and politics of sponsored evaluations. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.). Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 105–112). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. (1992). Prisoner’s children: What are the issues? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. (2011). Strengthening families, Promoting parental responsibility: The future of child maintenance. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. Retrieved from http://www.dwp.gov.uk/policy/child-maintenance

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, C. B. & Burton, L. M. (1993). Kinscripts. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 24, 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. Essex: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1999). Violent boys and precocious girls: Regulating childhood at the end of the millennium. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 1(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (2001). Safety and danger: Childhood, sexuality and space at the end of the millennium. In K. Hultqvist & G. Dahlberg (Eds.). Governing the child in the new millennium (pp. 15–34). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. R. (1992). Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and education: An overview. International Review of Education, 38(3), 252–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Judith Duncan and Sarah Te One

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, L., Holmes, R., MacLure, M. (2012). Disturbing Cultures of Incarceration: The Struggle for Normality and the Imprisoned Family. In: Duncan, J., One, S.T. (eds) Comparative Early Childhood Education Services. Critical Cultural Studies of Childhood. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016782_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics