Skip to main content

Building Strengths in Families and Communities

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Critical Cultural Studies of Childhood ((CCSC))

Abstract

This chapter presents the experiences of one community-based agency, Te Aroha Noa, which has developed effective strategies for enhancing family and community well-being. The agency’s name is derived from te reo Māori (the indigenous language of New Zealand) and embraces the idea of unconditional love and care. Te Aroha Noa provides early childhood services alongside a range of other services and has developed innovative approaches for nurturing the strengths of families. It has also contributed to building the capacity of the community within which it is situated. For over two decades, the agency has worked intentionally to understand the diverse needs of the families that come to Te Aroha Noa and has developed creative strategies for responding to these needs. Strengths-based and community-development perspectives inform the work and focus attention upon positive change strategies that enhance family and child well-being. This chapter presents the agency’s experiences in developing an approach to practice that spans early childhood, family and community work, and adult education. It explores the key concepts that are central to this practice. The chapter draws on examples from the Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) center, which is located on the main site of the agency, and the parenting support and education programs provided to families that are delivered on-site and in-home.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Archer, M. (2002). Realism and the problem of agency. Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (2007). Community-based parenting programmes: An exploration of the interplay between environmental and organizational factors in a Webster Stratton project. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M., Brandon, M., Chaskin, R., Fernandez, E., Grietens, H., Lightburn, A., McNamara, P. M.…& Zeira, A. (2006). Identifying sensitive outcomes of interventions in community-based centres. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 9(1–2), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessarab, D., & Crawford, F. (2010). Aboriginal practitioners speak out: Contextualising child protection interventions. Australian Social Work, 63(2), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, G. (2008). Evaluation and negotiated order. Evaluation, 14(4), 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2007). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. (2008, August). Early childhood centres as places for family resilience and social capital. Presentation to the Treasury Series on Social Mobility, Wellington, NZ. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/media…/tgls-duncan-pres.pdf

  • Duncan, B., Miller, S., & Sparks, J. (2004). The heroic client: A revolutionary way to improve effectiveness through client-directed, outcome-informed therapy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durie, R., & Wyatt, K. (2007). New communities, new relations: The impact of community organization on health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 65(9), 1928–1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection: A resource handbook. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education, culture, power and liberation. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, F., Fook, J., & White, S. (2006). Critical reflection: Possibilities for developing effectiveness in conditions of uncertainty. In F. Gardner, J. Fook & S. White (Eds.). Critical reflection in health and social care (pp. 228–240). Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerald, R., & McDonald, E. (2010). Building community within the community: Government-community partnerships in the District of Columbia’s child welfare system. Social Work Now, 45, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, R. (2004). Promoting resilience in child and family social work: Issues for social work practice. Social Work Education, 23, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M., Coates, J., & Yellow Bird, M. (2008). Introduction. In M. Gray, J. Coates & M. Yellow Bird (Eds.). Indigenous social work around the world: Towards culturally relevant education and practice (pp. 1–10). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, A. (2009). What counts in child protection and welfare? Qualitative Social Work, #(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handley, K., Horn, S., Kaipuke, R., Maden, B., Maden, E.,…Sanders J. (2009). The Spinifex effect—A theory of change. Wellington, New Zealand: The Families Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, S. (2010). Prising open the black box: Critical realism, action research and social work. Qualitative Social Work, 9(1), 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, C. (2000). At the edge of chaos—A new paradigm for social work? Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, L., & Ungar, M. (2009). Introduction: The challenges in researching resilience. In L. Liebenberg & M. Ungar (Eds.). Researching resilience (pp. 3–25). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightburn, A., & Warren-Adamson, C. (2006). Evaluating family centres: The importance of sensitive outcomes in cross-national studies. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 9(1–2), 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mataira, P. (2002). Treaty partnering: Establishment of a charter for Māori community based programmes. Te Komako, Social Work Review, 14 (2), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, H., & Mitchell, L. (2009). Strengthening community-based early child-hood education in Aotearoa New Zealand: Report of the Quality Public Early Childhood Education Project. Wellington, NZ: NZEI Te Riu Roa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (with Andrew, A., Butler, P., & Ruwhiu, L.) (2003). Action research with families/whānau and communities. In R. Munford & J. Sanders (Eds.). Making a difference in families: Research that creates change (pp. 93–112). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2005). Working with families: Strengthsbased approaches. In M. Nash, R. Munford & K. O’Donoghue (Eds.). Social work theories in action (pp. 158–173). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2008). Assessment of families. In W. Rowe & L. A. Rapp-Paglicci (Eds.). Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare: Social work practice (pp. 399–422). USA: Hoboken, NJ: W. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2011). Embracing the diversity of practice: Indigenous knowledge and mainstream social work practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 25(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munford, R., Sanders, J., & Maden, B. (2007). Blending whānau/family development, parent support and early childhood education programmes. Journal of Social Policy, 32, 72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, R., & Walsh-Tapiata, W. (2005). Community development principles into practice. In M. Nash, R. Munford & K. O’Donoghue (Eds.). Social work theories in action (pp. 97–112). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J. (2007). Appreciative inquiry: Research for change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeler, D. (n.d.) A theory of social change and implications for practice, planning, monitoring and evaluation. Cape Town, South Africa: Community Development Resource Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, G. (2005). Relationship-based practice and reflective practice: Holistic approaches to contemporary child care social work. Child & Family Social Work, 10 (2), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruwhiu, L. (2009). Indigenous issues in Aotearoa New Zealand. In M. Connolly & L. Harms (Eds.). Social work: Contexts and practice (pp. 107–120). South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., & Munford R. (2010). Working with families: Strengths-based approaches. Wellington, NZ: Dunmore Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2011). Reading Bauman for social work. Ethics & Social Welfare, 5(1), 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., Zimmerman, B., & Patton, M. Q. (2006). Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. Toronto, ON: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Judith Duncan and Sarah Te One

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Munford, R., Sanders, J., Maden, B. (2012). Building Strengths in Families and Communities. In: Duncan, J., One, S.T. (eds) Comparative Early Childhood Education Services. Critical Cultural Studies of Childhood. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016782_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics