Abstract
The standard ingredients of the American success myth — the promise of social mobility, the irrelevance of accidents of birth, the cult of individual enterprise, the dividends paid by hard work, the cornucopia of consumer goods that are the reward for toil — are so much a part of our daily fare that to question them seems subversive. Ideology, by definition, is normative, and the norms of the success myth are among the most intrinsic of American ideologies. But the recursive loop between myth and ideology is stretched to its limits by Hollywood movies that manage to foreground the myth’s ideological inconsistencies. Such films put the cultural contradictions regarding work, success, and fulfillment in their crosshairs, setting their sights on the ways in which the American idea of success is conflated with vocational achievement, material attainment, and individual will. In counterposing contentment with conventional notions of success, they suggest that one needs to be sacrificed in order to achieve the other. The prior two chapters have shown that this marked ambivalence is consistently evident in stories revolving around professional success as an indicator of self-worth. On the one hand, work is equated with masculinity, adulthood, and deep-seated American ideas about individual initiative and mobility. Alternatively — and sometimes simultaneously — work is seen as demeaning and spiritually deadening, and only an escape from the workaday world allows one to regain his individuality and integrity.
I loaf and invite my soul
— Walt Whitman, Song of Myself
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Northrup Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), 170.
Johan Huizinga, Homo Ludens (New York: Beacon Press, 1971).
Barbara Ehrenreich, Fear of Falling: The Inner Life of the Middle Class (New York: Pantheon, 1989), 85.
Among the many books about screwball comedies that discuss the centrality of play are: Ed Sikov, Screwball!: Hollywood’s Madcap Romantic Comedies (New York: Crown, 1989) and
Stanley Cavell, Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).
One of the best discussions of comedy and transgression is found in William Paul, Laughing Screaming: Modern Hollywood Horror and Comedy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994).
Geoff King, Film Comedy (London: Wallflower Press, 2002), 78.
Victor Turner, The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1970), 97.
Victor Turner, The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1969), 95.
Mikhail Bakhtin, Rabelais and His World (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1984), 177, 15. For a discussion of Bakhtin’s applicability to film, see
Robert Stam, Subversive Pleasures: Bakhtin, Cultural Criticism, and Film (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989).
Joanne B. Ciulla, The Working Life: The Promise and Betrayal of Modern Work (New York: Three Rivers Press, 2001), 6.
Anson Rabinbach, The Human Motor: Energy, Fatigue, and the Origins of Modernity (New York: Basic Books, 1990), 28. Rabinbach’s book is a sprawling intellectual history of cultural perspectives on labor.
Robert Warshow, ‘The Gangster as a Tragic Hero,’ The Immediate Experience (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002). Warshow’s essay on the cowboy, in this same volume, also discusses the American archetype of the maverick loner who needs to isolate himself in order to be himself.
For a listing of movies about labor, see Tom Zaniello, Working Stiffs, Union Maids, Reds and Riffraff: An Expanded Guide to Films about Labor (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003). For an analysis of labor movies, see
John Bodnar, Blue-Collar Hollywood: Liberalism, Democracy, and Working People in American Film (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003) and the chapter ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Violent: Class Conflict and Labor-Capital Genre,’ in Working-Class Hollywood: Silent Film and the Shaping of Class in America, Steven J. Ross (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998).
Ray’s book is particularly incisive about this as is Jim Purdy’s and Peter Roffman’s The Hollywood Social Problem Film: Madness, Despair, and Politics from the Depression to the Fifties (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1981).
See Charles Musser, ‘Work, Ideology, and Chaplin’s Tramp,’ in Resisting Images: Essays on Cinema and History, Robert Sklar and Charles Musser, eds. (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1990) for a discussion of the tramp’s persona and the ideology of work in Chaplin’s two-reelers. Musser also discusses the resonance of Chaplin’s outlook on work for working-class audiences of the time.
An ongoing debate in interpretations of Chaplin’s films involves whether the tramp is an outcast or a rebel: whether he can’t or won’t conform. Is his inability to hold a job a conscious, conscience-driven rejection of work and its attendant drudgery or is it simply an inability to measure up to what’s required? The persistent appearance in American films of a protagonist who bails out of the work force in an act of opposition to its oppressions suggests the former interpretation. See, for instance, Donald W. McCaffrey, Focus on Chaplin (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1971).
Several authors have written about why Chaplin was intent on making essentially silent films well into the sound era. See, for instance, Walter Kerr, The Silent Clowns (New York: Knopf, 1975).
Gerald Weals, Canned Goods as Caviar: American Film Comedy of the 1930s (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1985), 26.
One of the best extended discussions of Capra’s films is Ray Carney’s American Vision: The Films of Frank Capra (Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, 1986).
Leslie A. Fiedler, Love and Death in the American Novel (Normal, IL: Dalkey Archive Press, 1988).
Pauline Kael, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1968), 29.
David Sterritt, Mad to Be Saved: The Beats, the 50s, and Film (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1998), 168–9.
Carl Jung, Four Archetypes: Mother, Rebirth, Spirit, Trickster (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970).
Explorations of teen archetypes in American movies can be found in Thomas Doherty’s Teenagers and Teenpics: The Juvenilization of American Movies in the 1950s (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2002);
Timothy Shary, Generation Multiplex: The Image of Youth in Contemporary American Cinema (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2002); and
Timothy Shary, Teen Movies: American Youth on Screen (New York: Wallflower, 2006).
Daniel Bell, ‘Work and Its Discontents,’ in The End of Ideology, Daniel Bell (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988), 255.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Julie Levinson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levinson, J. (2012). Hallelujah, I’m a Bum: The Glorification of Unemployment. In: The American Success Myth on Film. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016676_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016676_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34891-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01667-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)