Abstract
While an increasing number of observational studies in modern political science use quite sophisticated statistical methods, experimental studies often continue to apply rather simple statistical instruments like t-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA). At first sight this is surprising if one considers that many modern statistical methods had been developed and invented for the analysis of data generated in random experiments (see, for example, Fisher, 1935). It is, however, less surprising if one considers that more sophisticated statistical methods were developed much later in order to cope with specific data problems in observational studies. Looking from the perspective of the random experimentalist, the most serious statistical challenges in observational data arise from treatment imbalance and from the violation of the assumption that the independent variables are distributed independently and identically at random.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bräuninger, Thomas, Susumu Shikano and Michael Stoffel (2008) ‘An Experimental Study of Decision Costs in Majority Rule Voting’, prepared for the Workshop ‘Experimental Political Science’ at Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg, Delmenhorst.
Fisher, Ronald A. (1935) The Design of Experiments (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd).
Fiorina, Morris and Charles R. Plott (1978) ‘Committee Decisions under Majority Rule’, American Political Science Review, 72, 575–598.
Fischbacher, Urs (2007) ‘z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments’, Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178.
Greiner, Ben (2003) ‘An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments’ in Kurt Kremer, Volker Macho (eds.) Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen, GWDG Bericht 63, Göttingen: Ges. fĂ¼r Wiss. Datenverarbeitung, 79–93.
Herzberg, Roberta and Rick Wilson (1991) ‘Costly Agendas and Spatial Voting Games: Theory and Experiments on Agenda Access Costs’, in Thomas Palfrey (ed.) Experimentation in Political Science (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
McKelvey, Richard D. (1976) ‘Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control’, Journal of Economic Theory, 12, 472–482.
Rutherford, Andrew (2001) Introducing ANOVA and ANCOVA: A GLM Approach (London: Sage).
Salant, Stephen W. and Eban Goodstein (1990) ‘Predicting Committee Behavior in Majority Rule Voting Experiments’, RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 293–313.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Susumu Shikano , Thomas Bräuninger and Michael Stoffel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shikano, S., Bräuninger, T., Stoffel, M. (2012). Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data. In: Kittel, B., Luhan, W.J., Morton, R.B. (eds) Experimental Political Science. Research Methods Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016645_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016645_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33654-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01664-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)