Skip to main content

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

  • Chapter
Experimental Political Science

Part of the book series: Research Methods Series ((REMES))

Abstract

While an increasing number of observational studies in modern political science use quite sophisticated statistical methods, experimental studies often continue to apply rather simple statistical instruments like t-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA). At first sight this is surprising if one considers that many modern statistical methods had been developed and invented for the analysis of data generated in random experiments (see, for example, Fisher, 1935). It is, however, less surprising if one considers that more sophisticated statistical methods were developed much later in order to cope with specific data problems in observational studies. Looking from the perspective of the random experimentalist, the most serious statistical challenges in observational data arise from treatment imbalance and from the violation of the assumption that the independent variables are distributed independently and identically at random.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bräuninger, Thomas, Susumu Shikano and Michael Stoffel (2008) ‘An Experimental Study of Decision Costs in Majority Rule Voting’, prepared for the Workshop ‘Experimental Political Science’ at Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg, Delmenhorst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Ronald A. (1935) The Design of Experiments (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris and Charles R. Plott (1978) ‘Committee Decisions under Majority Rule’, American Political Science Review, 72, 575–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbacher, Urs (2007) ‘z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments’, Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, Ben (2003) ‘An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments’ in Kurt Kremer, Volker Macho (eds.) Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen, GWDG Bericht 63, Göttingen: Ges. fĂ¼r Wiss. Datenverarbeitung, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, Roberta and Rick Wilson (1991) ‘Costly Agendas and Spatial Voting Games: Theory and Experiments on Agenda Access Costs’, in Thomas Palfrey (ed.) Experimentation in Political Science (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, Richard D. (1976) ‘Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control’, Journal of Economic Theory, 12, 472–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, Andrew (2001) Introducing ANOVA and ANCOVA: A GLM Approach (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salant, Stephen W. and Eban Goodstein (1990) ‘Predicting Committee Behavior in Majority Rule Voting Experiments’, RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Susumu Shikano , Thomas Bräuninger and Michael Stoffel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shikano, S., Bräuninger, T., Stoffel, M. (2012). Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data. In: Kittel, B., Luhan, W.J., Morton, R.B. (eds) Experimental Political Science. Research Methods Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016645_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics