Skip to main content

High-Tech Cluster Revolution from an Organizational Ecology Perspective

  • Chapter
Cross-Sector Leadership for the Green Economy
  • 408 Accesses

Abstract

The green revolution offers a plethora of potential innovation, much of which will take place in high-tech clusters. These clusters thus become interesting settings for testing and extending theories of organizational ecology, a set of theories that explain how selection processes shape population level organizational adaptation to environmental variation. This theory can be used to explain the adaptation of a new industry to an incumbent one. What happens when a new industry encroaches on the incumbent industry’s space? To what extent are the new and old industries able to survive and coexist? What is the effect of the second-generation industry’s movement into a niche incumbents already occupy?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W. P. (1993). Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37, 1175–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T., & Gambardella, A. (2007). Building high-tech clusters. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R. (1984). Organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R., & Delacroix, J. (1982). Organizational mortality in the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland: An ecological approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R., & Swaminathan, A. (1991). Density dependent organizational evolution in the American brewing industry from 1633 to 1988. Acta Sociologica, 34, 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R., & Swaminathan, A. (2000). Why the microbrewery movement?. Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 715–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, S. (2007). How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable?. Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster. Research Policy, 36, 438–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisingerich, A. B., Bell, S. J., & Tracey, P. (2010). How can clusters sustain performance?. The role of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty. Research Policy, 39, 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48, 692–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromhold-Eisebith, M., & Eisebith, G. (2005). How to institutionalize innovative clusters?. Comparing explicit top-down and implicit bottom-up approaches. Research Policy, 34, 1250–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. (1986). Competitive and institutional processes in organizational ecology. Technical Report 86–13, Department of Sociology, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids — Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iammarino, S., & McCann, P. (2006). The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research Policy, 35, 1018–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, R. (2009). Oregon looks to clean tech for revival. Wall Street Journal, New York, N.Y., Aug 28, A.5.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaMonica, M. (2009). Massachusetts goes green to relive tech glory. CNET news. [Online access http://news.cnet.com/8301–11128_3–10265420–54.html January, 30, 2010.]

  • Li, J. T., & Guisinger, S. (1991). Comparative business failures of foreign-controlled firms in the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics, 8th ed. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, A. S., Amburgey, T. L., & Stearns, T. M. (1990). Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 689–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI; Japan) (2004). Industrial cluster project. [Online access http://www.cluster.gr.jp/en/about/index.html March, 21, 2011]

  • Myint, Y. M., Vyakarnam, S., & New, M. J. (2005). The effect of social capital in new venture creation: the Cambridge high-technology cluster. Strategic Change, 14, 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, A. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Filer, L. (2007). Localized advantage in a global economy: The case of Bangalore. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49, 591–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C.A.I., & Tushman, M. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, April, 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: a conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science, 12, 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. (1979). Theory of population genetics and evolutionary ecology: An introduction. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations, (pp. 153–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tam, P. W. (2010). Painting Silicon Valley a new shade of green. Wall Street Journal (online), New York, N.Y., May 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alfred Marcus Paul Shrivastava Sanjay Sharma Stefano Pogutz

Copyright information

© 2011 Alfred Marcus, Paul Shrivastava, Sanjay Sharma, and Stefano Pogutz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Lange, D. (2011). High-Tech Cluster Revolution from an Organizational Ecology Perspective. In: Marcus, A., Shrivastava, P., Sharma, S., Pogutz, S. (eds) Cross-Sector Leadership for the Green Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015891_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics