Abstract
The green revolution offers a plethora of potential innovation, much of which will take place in high-tech clusters. These clusters thus become interesting settings for testing and extending theories of organizational ecology, a set of theories that explain how selection processes shape population level organizational adaptation to environmental variation. This theory can be used to explain the adaptation of a new industry to an incumbent one. What happens when a new industry encroaches on the incumbent industry’s space? To what extent are the new and old industries able to survive and coexist? What is the effect of the second-generation industry’s movement into a niche incumbents already occupy?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W. P. (1993). Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 51–73.
Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37, 1175–1187.
Bresnahan, T., & Gambardella, A. (2007). Building high-tech clusters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
Carroll, G. R. (1984). Organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 71–93.
Carroll, G. R., & Delacroix, J. (1982). Organizational mortality in the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland: An ecological approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 169–198.
Carroll, G. R., & Swaminathan, A. (1991). Density dependent organizational evolution in the American brewing industry from 1633 to 1988. Acta Sociologica, 34, 155–175.
Carroll, G. R., & Swaminathan, A. (2000). Why the microbrewery movement?. Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 715–762.
Casper, S. (2007). How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable?. Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster. Research Policy, 36, 438–455.
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Eisingerich, A. B., Bell, S. J., & Tracey, P. (2010). How can clusters sustain performance?. The role of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty. Research Policy, 39, 239–253.
Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48, 692–710.
Fromhold-Eisebith, M., & Eisebith, G. (2005). How to institutionalize innovative clusters?. Comparing explicit top-down and implicit bottom-up approaches. Research Policy, 34, 1250–1268.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10–36.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Hannan, M. T. (1986). Competitive and institutional processes in organizational ecology. Technical Report 86–13, Department of Sociology, Cornell University.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids — Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 481–492.
Iammarino, S., & McCann, P. (2006). The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research Policy, 35, 1018–1036.
Knutson, R. (2009). Oregon looks to clean tech for revival. Wall Street Journal, New York, N.Y., Aug 28, A.5.
LaMonica, M. (2009). Massachusetts goes green to relive tech glory. CNET news. [Online access http://news.cnet.com/8301–11128_3–10265420–54.html January, 30, 2010.]
Li, J. T., & Guisinger, S. (1991). Comparative business failures of foreign-controlled firms in the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 209–224.
Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics, 8th ed. London: Macmillan.
Miner, A. S., Amburgey, T. L., & Stearns, T. M. (1990). Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 689–713.
Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI; Japan) (2004). Industrial cluster project. [Online access http://www.cluster.gr.jp/en/about/index.html March, 21, 2011]
Myint, Y. M., Vyakarnam, S., & New, M. J. (2005). The effect of social capital in new venture creation: the Cambridge high-technology cluster. Strategic Change, 14, 165–177.
Nair, A. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Filer, L. (2007). Localized advantage in a global economy: The case of Bangalore. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49, 591–618.
O’Reilly, C.A.I., & Tushman, M. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, April, 74–81.
Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: a conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science, 12, 37–53.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.
Roughgarden, J. (1979). Theory of population genetics and evolutionary ecology: An introduction. New York: Macmillan.
Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations, (pp. 153–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Tam, P. W. (2010). Painting Silicon Valley a new shade of green. Wall Street Journal (online), New York, N.Y., May 12.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2011 Alfred Marcus, Paul Shrivastava, Sanjay Sharma, and Stefano Pogutz
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Lange, D. (2011). High-Tech Cluster Revolution from an Organizational Ecology Perspective. In: Marcus, A., Shrivastava, P., Sharma, S., Pogutz, S. (eds) Cross-Sector Leadership for the Green Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015891_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015891_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29828-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01589-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)