Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rethinking Sustainability, Innovation, and Financial Performance

  • Chapter
Book cover Cross-Sector Leadership for the Green Economy

Abstract

In light of the recent financial crises, many economists and politicians claim that a paradigm change in modern capitalism is needed, from short-term profit maximization to a long-term value value-creating and value-maintaining strategy. In this context, scholars have emphasized stakeholder claims, institutional change, corporate responsibilities, and the role of ecological conditions on the competitive environment (Buysse & Verbeke, 2003; Delmas & Toffel, 2004; Henriques & Sadorsky, 1999; Hoffman, 1999; Kassinis & Vafeas, 2006; Aragon-Correa & Sharma, 2003; Darnall & Edwards, 2006; Sharma & Vredenburg, 1998; Husted & Allen, 2007; Matten & Crane, 2005; Scherer & Palazzo, 2007). For managers this entails investing in resources that enhance the firm’s environmental and social performance while continuing to pursue economic growth. The goals are to minimize the firm’s negative effects on the natural environment and society without compromising profits. Are these goals mutually exclusive? We find that they are compatible in the long run. They are different sides of the same coin, with innovation being the missing link between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acs, Z., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green?. A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J., & Adger, W. N. (2007). Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Political Geography, 26, 639–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research—Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer, B., & Ireland, D. (2008). Entrepreneurship: Successfully launching new ventures. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berchicci, L., & King, A. (2007). Chapter 11: Postcards from the edge. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 513–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Gelabert, L., & Fosfuri, A. (2009). The impact of symbolic and substantive actions on environmental legitimacy. Barcelona: IESE Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E. H., & Haire, M. (1975). A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 18(2), 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. A. T. (1972). Is pollution profitable?. Risk Management, 19(4), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different?. An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1325–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 895–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s-Q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, J. G., Crook, T. R., & Shook, C. L. (2004). The dimensionality of organizational performance and its implications for strategic management research. In D. D. Bergh (Ed.), Research methodology in strategy and management, (pp. 259–286). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Kleinschmidt, E. (1987). New products: What separates winners from losers?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation —A metaanalysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance—The problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., & Edwards, D. (2006). Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSimone, L. D., & Popoff, F. (1997). Eco-Efficiency, The business link to sustainable development. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation—Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes?. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Summer special issue), 55–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann, T. (2006). Internet companies’ growth strategies: Determinants of investment intensity and long-term performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), 1183–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsayed, K., & Paton, D. (2005). The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Static and dynamic panel data evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16, 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filbeck, G., & Gorman, R. F. (2004). The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environmental & Resource Economics, 29(2), 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, S. J., & Hope, C. (2007). A critical review of sustainable business indices and their impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(3), 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J., Mellahi, K., & Pigman, G. (2006). First mover advantages in international business and firm-specific political resources. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, A. (1988). Measuring and modeling changes in strategy—Theoretical foundations and empirical directions. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 559–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development—Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., & Vredenburg, H. (2003). The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green?. An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line?. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. (2007). Statistical Methods for Psychology (6th ed). Belmont, CA: Thompson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2007). Corporate social strategy in multinational enterprises: Antecedents and value creation. Journal Of Business Ethics, 74(4), 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2007). A cross-disciplinary exploration of entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management, 33(6), 891–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., & Lenox, M. (2001). Does it really pay to be green?. An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(1), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y., & Mahoney, J. (2005). How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 489–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, T. (1993). Middle managers’ contribution to implemented information technology innovation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. (2000). Sustainable innovation through an entrepreneurship lens. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9(5), 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. (2005). Management Strategy. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw Hill /Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A., & Fremeth, A. (2009). Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good . . . and does it matter?. A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working chapter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. J. (2002). The O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsato, R. (2006). Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green?. California Management Review, 48(2), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M., & Bass, F. (1989). When to lead or follow?. It depends. Marketing Letters, 1(3), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining, superior performance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment—Competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prashant, K., Dyer, J., & Singh, J. (2002). Value creation and success in strategic alliances: Alliancing skills and the role of alliance structure systems. European Management Journal, 19(5), 463–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, F. L. (1998). Environmental product differentiation: Implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 40(4), 43–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. (1988). Sources of market pioneer advantages: The case of industrial goods industries. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39(4), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. (1987). Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal, (pp. 137–158). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Durand, R. M. and Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3): 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated Web—Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosi, H. L., Werner, S., Katz, J. P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2000). How much does performance matter?. A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26(2), 301–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U. S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWerf, P. A., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). Meta-analysis of the impact of research methods on findings of first mover advantage. Management Science, 43(11), 1510–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 46–&.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B., & Montgomery, C. A. (1988). Tobin-Q and the importance of focus in firm performance. American Economic Review, 78(1), 246–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman, G., & Cooper, W. H. (2000). Ecological embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1265–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. (2009). Does One size Fit all?. The multiple organizational forms leading to successful academic entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 929–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our common future. Oxford: World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D., & Chung-Ming, L. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship as resource capital configuration in emerging market firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 32(1), 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship performance relationship—a Longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Timo Busch

  2. Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA

    Bryan T. T. Stinchfield

  3. University of North Carolina, Wilmington, USA

    Matthew S. S. Wood

Authors
  1. Timo Busch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bryan T. T. Stinchfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew S. S. Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Alfred Marcus Paul Shrivastava Sanjay Sharma Stefano Pogutz

Copyright information

© 2011 Alfred Marcus, Paul Shrivastava, Sanjay Sharma, and Stefano Pogutz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Busch, T., Stinchfield, B.T., Wood, M.S. (2011). Rethinking Sustainability, Innovation, and Financial Performance. In: Marcus, A., Shrivastava, P., Sharma, S., Pogutz, S. (eds) Cross-Sector Leadership for the Green Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015891_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation