Abstract
The Internet is central to what humanitarian work psychologists do and to who they are. This is the case because humanitarian work psychologists frequently conduct research online, communicate and collaborate online, and help to promote their field and gain new participants online. This chapter argues that humanitarian work psychologists’ use of the Internet will help to determine the success of their field. In particular, if voices from lower-income settings are not included in their online networks and communities, then the field risks not being effective and ethical, it risks losing the opportunity to broaden psychology’s global perspective, and it risks exacerbating global inequality. These claims are supported for the following three reasons: First, it is widely argued that humanitarian work is more likely to be effective when the people who are meant to benefit from that work are allowed to voice their perspectives and participate in the process (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2009). Second, psychology’s global relevance hinges upon whether it includes diverse international perspectives (Gelfand, Leslie & Fehr, 2008; Marsella, 1998) — and such perspectives would almost certainly include those from lower-income settings that traditionally receive humanitarian aid. Moreover, humanitarian work psychologists’ online networks and communities are important places for those perspectives to be included. Third, the nature of the digital divide may not only reinforce existing resource disparities between active Internet users and those who are disconnected, but it can also create new networking and informational inequalities (Van Dijk, 2005).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ager, A. & Loughry, M. (2004). ‘Psychology and humanitarian assistance’. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance. Retrieved from http://www.jha.ac/articles/a131.htm.
Beenen, G., Ling, K., Wang, X., Chang, K., Frankowski, D., Resnick, P. & Kraut R. E. (2004). ‘Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 10. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/ling.html.
Bess, K. D., Prilleltensky, I., Perkins, D. D. & Collins, L. V. (2009). ‘Participatory organization change in community-based health and human services: From tokenism to political engagement’. Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 134–48.
Brown, F. W. & Finstuen, K. (1993). ‘The use of participation in decision making: A consideration of the Vroom-Yetton and Vroom-Jago normative models’. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 207–19.
Carr, S. C., MacLachlan, M., Reichman, W., Klobas, J., Berry, M. O. & Furnham, A. (2008). ‘Organizational psychology and poverty reduction: Where supply meets demand’. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 843–51.
Carr, S.C, McWha, I, MacLachlan, M. & Furnham, A. (2010). ‘International-local remuneration differences across six countries: Do they undermine poverty reduction work?’ International Journal of Psychology, 45, 321–40.
Chinn, M. D. & Fairlie, R. W. (2010). ‘ICT use in the developing world: An analysis of difference in computer and Internet penetration’. Review of International Economics, 18, 153–67.
Church, M., Bitel, M., Armstrong, K., Fernando, P., Gould, H., Joss, S., Marwaha-Diedrich, M., Laura de la Torre, A. L. & Vouhe, C. (2002). Participation, relationships, and dynamic change: New thinking on evaluating the work of international networks. London: University College London.
Eagle, N., Macy, M. & Claxton, R. (2010). ‘Network diversity and economic development’. Science, 328, 1029–31.
Easterly, W. (2006). The white man’s burden: Why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. London: Penguin Books.
Facebook. (2010). Press room. Retrieved from http://www.facebook.com/press/info. php?statistics on 15 October 2010.
Fong, M. W. L. (2009). ‘Digital divide: The case of developing countries’. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6, 471–8.
Fuchs, C. & Horak, E. (2008). ‘Africa and the digital divide’. Telematics and Informatics, 25, 99–116.
Gelfand, M. J., Leslie, L. M. & Fehr, R. (2008). ‘To prosper, organizational psychology should … adopt a global perspective’. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 29, 493–517.
Howard, T. W. (2010). Design to thrive: Creating social networks and online communities that last. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
Huyer, S. (2005). ‘Women, ICT and the information society: Global perspectives and initiatives’. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Women, 126, 1.
International Telecommunications Union (2010). World telecommunication/ICT development report 2010: Monitoring the WSIS targets. Geneva: ITU. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/ind/D-IND-WTDR-2010-PDF-E.pdf.
Internet World Stats (2010). Retrieved October 15, 2010 from http://www.internet-worldstats.com.
Lefkowitz, J. (2008). ‘To prosper, organizational psychology should … expand the values of organizational psychology to match the quality of its ethics’. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 439–53.
Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R. & Earley, P. C. (1990). ‘Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952–9.
Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2002). ‘Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey’. American Psychologist, 57, 705–17.
MacLachlan, M., Carr, S. C. & McAuliffe, E. (2010). The aid triangle: Recognizing the human dynamics of dominance, justice and identity. New York, NY: Zed Books Ltd.
Marsella, A. J. (1998). ‘Toward a “global-community psychology”: Meeting the needs of a changing world’. American Psychologist, 53(12), 1282–91.
Mehryar, A. H. (1984). ‘The role of psychology in national development: wishful thinking and reality’. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 159–67.
Nelson, G. & Prilleltensky, I. (2010). Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being (2nd edn). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Norris, T. E., Hart, G. L., Larson, E. H., Tarczy-Hornoch, P., Masuda, D. L., Fuller, S. S. & Dyck, S. M. (2002). ‘Low-bandwidth, low-cost telemedicine consultations in rural family practice’. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 15, 123–7.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009). Better aid: Aid effectiveness: A progress report on implementing the Paris Declaration. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264050877-en.
Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: designing usability, supporting sociability. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Shanin, T. (1997). ‘The idea of progress’. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawtree (Eds), The postdevelopment reader (pp. 65–71). London: Zed Books.
Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
Thompson, M. (2008). ‘ICT and development studies: Towards development 2.0’. Journal of International Development, 20, 821–35.
Thompson, L. F. & Atkins, S. G. (2010). ‘Technology, mobility, and poverty reduction’. The psychology of mobility in a global era. New York, NY: Springer.
Thompson, L. F., Meriac, J. P. & Cope, J. G. (2002). ‘Motivating online performance: The influences of goal setting and Internet self-efficacy’. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 149–60.
United Nations (2010). Millennium Development Goals report 2010. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG%20Report%202010%20En%20r15%20-low%20res%2020100615%20-.pdf/
United Nations Development Programme (2010). Human development report 2010. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Complete_reprint.pdf.
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). ‘Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings’. Poetics, 34, 221–35.
Vignovic, J. A. & Thompson, L. F. (2010). ‘Computer-mediated cross-cultural collaboration: Attributing communication errors to the person versus the situation’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 265–76.
Vroom, V. H. & Jago, A. G. (2007). ‘The role of the situation in leadership’. American Psychologist, 62, 17–24.
Wilson III, E. J. (2004). The information revolution and developing countries. MA: MIT Press.
Zuckerman, E. (2008). ‘Meet the bridgebloggers’. Public Choice, 134, 47–65.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Alexander Gloss, Sarah Glavey & Jeffrey Godbout
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gloss, A., Glavey, S., Godbout, J. (2012). Building Digital Bridges: The Digital Divide and Humanitarian Work Psychology’s Online Networks and Communities. In: Carr, S.C., MacLachlan, M., Furnham, A. (eds) Humanitarian Work Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015228_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015228_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32480-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01522-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)