Advertisement

Continental Europeans Respond to American Consumer Culture: Jürgen Habermas, Roland Barthes, and Umberto Eco

  • Daniel Horowitz
Part of the Worlds of Consumption book series (WC)

Abstract

In the middle of the twentieth century, new ways of looking at consumer culture emerged in America and Western Europe that emphasized pleasure, symbolic communication, skepticism about moralistic judgments, and an exploration of the relationship between producers and consumers. Writers began to see popular culture as the locus of aesthetic creativity and rich meanings. They took consumer culture seriously without fully embracing it, as they mixed fascination, irony, criticism, and detachment. From the mid-1950s to the early 1960s, three European writers offered especially suggestive approaches. Jürgen Habermas wrote essays that both worked within and mildly challenged the framework that his mentors Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno had offered in Dialectic of Enlightenment. (1944). In Mythologies. (1957), Roland Barthes explored the ways commercial performances and advertisements conveyed symbolic meanings. The literary critic and philosopher Umberto Eco pondered the strengths and weaknesses of popular culture, much of it from the United States, as he revealed, like Barthes, what it meant to use sophisticated literary and philosophical approaches to understand mass media in new ways.

Keywords

Public Sphere Open Work Popular Culture Mass Culture Comic Strip 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Tony Judt, Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945.(New York, 2005), 13, 220–37, 324–53, 377–80.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories, and Political Significance., trans. Michael Robertson (Cambridge, MA, 1994), 537–66.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    William Outhwaite, Habermas: Critical Introduction. (Stanford, 1994), 6.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Jürgen Habermas, “Für und Wider: Der Mensch Zwischen den Apparaten,” Süddeutsche Zeitung., September 6–7, 1958, 48. For translations of Habermas I am grateful to Herwig Friedl, Katharina Motyl, and especially Conor McNally.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Jürgen Habermas, “Können Kondumenten spielen?” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, April 13, 1957, Feuilleton, 1.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Jürgen Habermas, “Des Hörspiels Mangel ist seine Chance,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung., September 15, 1952, 4.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Jürgen Habermas, “Der Moloch und die Künste: Gedanken zur Entlarvung der Legende von der technischen Zweckmäßigkeit,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung., May 30, 1953, 20.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Jürgen Habermas, “Auto fahren: Der Mensch am Lenkrad,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung., November 27, 1954, 29–30.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Jürgen Habermas, “Man möchte sich mitreißen lassen: Feste und Feiern in dieser Zeit,“ Handelsblatt., February 17, 1956, Feuilleton, 4.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Jürgen Habermas, “Die Masse—das sind wir: Bildung und soziale Stellung kein Schutz gegen den Kollektivismus? Das Gift der Menschenverachtung,” Handelsblatt, October 29, 1954, Feuilleton, 4.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    Jürgen Habermas, “ ‘Stil’ auch für den Alltag: Die ‘Industrieformung’ nutzt und hilft dem Konsumenten,” Handelsblatt., September 23, 1955, 4.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    I have been unable to find much written in English on this essay; but exceptions are Andrew Edgar, The Philosophy of Habermas. (Montreal, 2005), 4Google Scholar
  13. Paul Gottfried, “The Habermasian Moment,” Journal of Libertarian Studies. 19 (Spring 2005): 52.Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    Jürgen Habermas, “Die Dialektik der Rationalisierung: Vom Pauperismus in Produktion und Konsum [1954],” in Arbeit, Freizeit, Konsum: Frühe Aufsätze. (The Hague, 1973), 3–26.Google Scholar
  15. 23.
    Jürgen Habermas, Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. [1962], trans. Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence (Cambridge, MA, 1989), 175, 188, and 192.Google Scholar
  16. John Durham Peters, “Distrust of Representation: Habermas on the Public Sphere,” Media, Culture and Society. 15 (Oct. 1993): 541–71, offers a probing analysis of the way Habermas, in Structural Transformation. and his later work, worked against Adorno and Horkheimer’s negative views of mass media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 24.
    Lizabeth Cohen, A Consumers’ Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America. (New York, 2003), 8–9.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    Matthew G. Specter, Habermas: An Intellectual Biography.(New York, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 26.
    Roland Barthes, Mythologies., trans. Annette Lavers (1957; New York, 1972)Google Scholar
  20. Roland Barthes, The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies. (New York, 1997).Google Scholar
  21. Michael Moriarty, Roland Barthes. (Stanford, 1991).Google Scholar
  22. 28.
    Kristin Ross, Fast Cars, Clean Bodies: Decolonization and the Reordering of French Culture. (Cambridge, MA, 1995), 4–7.Google Scholar
  23. 31.
    Victoria de Grazia, Irresistible Empire: Americas Advance through Twentieth-Century Europe. (Cambridge, MA, 2005), 420.Google Scholar
  24. 34.
    Roland Barthes, “Maîtres et esclaves,” Lettres nouvelles. (March 1953): 108Google Scholar
  25. Jonathan Culler, Roland Barthes. (New York, 1983), 40.Google Scholar
  26. Louis-Jean Calvet, Roland Barthes: A Biography., trans. Sarah Wykes (Bloomington, 1995), 118–20.Google Scholar
  27. 35.
    Philippe Roger, The American Enemy: A Story of French Anti-Americanism., trans. Sharon Bowman (Chicago, 2005).Google Scholar
  28. 36.
    Michel Winock, “The Cold War,” 74–75, in The Rise and Fall of Anti-Americanism: A Century of French Perception., ed. Denis Lacorne, Jacques Rupnik, and Marie-France Toinet, trans. Gerald Turner (Basingstoke, UK, 1990), 74–75.Google Scholar
  29. 40.
    Roland Barthes, Roland Barthes., trans. Richard Howard (Berkeley, 1994), 45, 63, and 164Google Scholar
  30. D. A. Miller, Bringing Out Roland Barthes. (Berkeley, 1992), 6 and 31Google Scholar
  31. Harold Beaver, “Homosexual Signs (In Memory of Roland Barthes),” Critical Inquiry. 8 (Autumn 1981): 99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robert K. Martin, “Roland Barthes: Toward an ‘Écriture Gaie,”’ in David Bergman, ed., Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality.(Amherst, MA, 1993), 282–98Google Scholar
  33. Graham Allen, Roland Barthes. (London, 2003), 98–99 and 106–107.Google Scholar
  34. 41.
    Peter Bondanella, Umberto Eco and the Open Text: Semiotics, Fiction, Popular Culture. (Cambridge, UK, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norma Bouchard, “Eco and Popular Culture,” in New Essays on Umberto Eco., ed. Peter Bondanella (Cambridge, UK, 2009), 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. David Robey, “Umberto Eco: Theory and Practice in the Analysis of the Media,” in Culture and Conflict in Postwar Italy: Essays on Mass and Popular Culture., ed. Zygmunt G. Baranski and Robert Lumley (Houndsmills, UK, 1990), 160–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gary P Radford, On Eco. (Belmont, CA, 2003), especially 39–43Google Scholar
  38. Christine Ann Evans, “Eco’s Fifth Column: The Critic of Culture Within the Precincts of the Popular,” in Umberto Eco’s Alternative: The Politics of Culture and the Ambiguities of Interpretation., ed. Norma Bouchard and Veronica Pravadelli (New York, 1998), 241–56.Google Scholar
  39. 42.
    Eco published on media even earlier: Umberto Eco, “Problemi estetici del fatto televisivo,” Atti del III congresso internazionale di estetica. (Turin, 1956).Google Scholar
  40. Umberto Eco, Diario Minimo. (Milan, 1963)Google Scholar
  41. Umberto Eco, “The Myth of Superman [1962],” first English publication in Diacritics. 2 (Spring 1972): 14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Umberto Eco, The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. (Bloomington, 1979), 107–24Google Scholar
  43. Umberto Eco, “Narrative Structures in Fleming [1965],” first published in English in Oreste del Buono and Umberto Eco, The Bond Affair. (London, 1966), 35–75, and then published, with revisions, in Eco, Role., 144–72Google Scholar
  44. Umberto Eco, “A Reading of Steve Canyon,” published in Italian in Umberto Eco, Apocalittici e Integrati: Comunicazioni di Massa e Teorie della Cultura di Massa. (Milan, 1964) and first published in English in Twentieth Century Studies. 15/16 (December 1976): 18–33Google Scholar
  45. Umberto Eco, “The Structure of Bad Taste” published in Apocalittici e Integrati. and then in Umberto Eco, The Open Work., trans. Anna Cancogni (Cambridge, MA, 1989) 180–216Google Scholar
  46. Umberto Eco, “Apocalyptic and Integrated intellectuals [1964],” originally published in Apocalittici e Integrati. and then appearing in Umberto Eco, Apocalypse Postponed., ed. Robert Lumley (Bloomington, 1994), 17–35Google Scholar
  47. Umberto Eco, Opera Aperta: Forma e Indeterminazione Nelle Poetiche Contemporanee.(Milan, 1962)Google Scholar
  48. Umberto Eco, “The Poetics of the Open Work,” Twentieth Century Studies. 12 (December 1974): 6–26.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Umberto Eco, “Verso una civiltà della visione,” in Pirelli: Rivista e informazione. 1 (Jan. 1961), quoted in Robert Limley, “Introduction,” to Eco, Apocalypse., 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The German Historical Institute 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Horowitz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations