Abstract
In recent years, the concept of the “secular icon” has become more and more popular in the field of visual studies. Secular icons are widely regarded as images of extraordinary symbolic power and as carriers of collective emotions and meanings. The following contribution offers a theoretical elaboration and a comparative case study of secular icons. Before entering the discussion on secular icons, I will address a more general problem: What is an “icon” and what does “iconic” mean? The answer to this question allows us to deal with secular icons in a broader cultural sociological perspective. In the English language, the word “iconic” has a double meaning. First of all, “iconic” is used for objects of visual experience, for example images and pictures.1 The second meaning of “iconic” refers to a certain type of collective symbols in the center of modern rituals, “cultural icons” such as famous wines or pop stars.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, J. C. 2006. The Civil Sphere. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
—. 2008. “Iconic Experience in Art and Life: Surface/Depth Beginning with Giacometti’s Standing Woman.“ Theory Culture Society, 25 (5): 1–19.
—. 2009. “The Social Construction of Moral Universals.“ In Remembering the Holocaust: A Debate, edited by J. C. Alexander, 3–102. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Barthes, R. 1977. Image—Music—Text. Selected and translated by S. Heath. New York: Noonday Press.
—. 1979. The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies. Translated by R. Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.
—. 1981. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Translated by R. Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.
Bevan, E. R. 1979. Holy Images: An Inquiry into Idolatry and Image-Worship in Ancient Paganism and in Christianity. New York: AMS Press.
Boehm, G. 1994. “Die Wiederkehr der Bilder” [The return of the images]. In Was ist ein Bild? [What is an image?], Edited by G. Boehm, 11–38. Munich: Fink.
Brink, C. 2000. “Secular Icons. Looking at Photographs from Nazi Concentration Camps.” History & Memory 12 (1): 135–50.
Burke, K. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature and Method. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Chong, D. 2000. The Girl in the Picture. The Story of Kim Phuc, the Photograph, and the Vietnam War. New York: Viking.
Durkheim, É. (1893) 1965. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by G. Simpson. New York: Free Press.
—. (1898) 1969. “Individualism and the Intellectuals.” Translated by S. and J. Lukes. Political Studies 17: 14–30.
—. (1912) 1995. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by J. W. Swain. New York: Free Press.
Ehrenreich, B. 2004. “Feminism’s Assumptions Upended.” In Abu Ghraib: The Politics of Torture, edited by M. Benvenisti, 65–70. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.
Eisenman, S. F. 2007. The Abu Ghraib Effect. London: Reaktion Books.
Foucault, M. 1973. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.
—. 1980. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Harper & Row.
Geertz, C. 2006. The Interpretation of Culture: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
Giesen, B. 2004. Triumph and Trauma. Boulder: Paradigm.
—. 2005. “Tales of Transcendence.” In Religion and Politics: Cultural Perspectives, edited by B. Giesen and D. Suber, 93–137. Leiden: Brill.
Goldberg, V. 1991. The Power of Photography: How Photographs Changed our Lives. New York: Abbeville Press.
Hensbergen, G. van. 2004. Guernica: The Biography of a Twentieth-Century Icon. London: Bloomsbury.
Hersh, S. M. 2004: “Torture at Abu Ghraib. American Soldiers Brutalized Iraqis. How Far up Does the Responsibility Go?” The New Yorker, May 10. http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2004/05/10/040510fa_fact
Lotman, Y. M. 1977. The Structure of the Artistic Text. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Marsh, B. 2009. “Faked Photographs: Look, and Then Look Again.“ New York Times, August 23.
Maynard, P. 1983. “The Secular Icon: Photography and the Function of Images.“ The Journal of Art and Criticism 42 (2): 155–69.
Michel, B. 2006. Bild und Habitus: Sinnbildungsprozesse bei der Rezeption von Fotografien [Image and habitus: processes of sense-making in the reception of photographs]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Mitchell, W. J. T. 1987. Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. 1994. “The Pictorial Turn.” In Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation, 11–34. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. 2004. “Echoes of a Christian Symbol: Photo Reverberates with the Raw Power of Christ on Cross.” Chicago Tribune, June 27.
Panofsky, E. 1955. Meaning in the Visual Arts: Papers in and on Art History. Garden City:: Doubleday.
Peirce, C. S. 1998. “What Is a Sign?“ In Selected Writings (1893–1913), 4–10. Bloomington:: Indiana University Press.
Ricœur, P. 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
—. 1973. “The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text.” New Literary History 5 (1): 91–117.
—. 1976. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
Rorty, R. M., ed. 1967. The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Sharlet, J. 2004. “Pictures from an Inquisition.“ The Revealer, http://www.therevealer.org/archives/revealing_000355.php.
Smith, P. 2008. Punishment and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sontag, S. 1977. On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
—. 2003. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
—. 2004. “Regarding the Torture of Others.” New York Times, May 23.
Spaemann, R. 1987. “Über den Begriff der Menschenwürde” [On the concept of human dignity]. In: Menschenrechte und Menschenwürde: Historische Voraussetzungen—säkulare Gestalt—christliches Verständnis [Human rights and human dignity: historical presuppositions—secular form—Christian understanding], edited by E.-W. Böckenförde and R. Spaemann, 295–313. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Torchin, L. 2006. “Ravished Armenia: Visual Media, Humanitarian Advocacy, and the Formation of Witnessing Publics.” American Anthropologist 108 (1): 214–20.
Warburg, A. 2000. Der Bilderatlas Mnemosyne [The atlas of images Mnemosyne]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Wittgenstein, L. 1984. “Tractatus logico-philosophicus.” In Tractatus logico-philosophicus: Werkausgabe, vol. 1: Tractatus. Tagebücher 1914–1916. Philosophische Untersuchungen [Tractatus. Diaries 1914–1916. Philosophical investigations], 9–85. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Zelizer, B. 2005. “Death in Wartime: Photographs and the ‘Other War’ in Afghanistan.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 10 (3): 26–55.
Zimbardo, P. G. 2007. The Lucifer Effect: How Good People Turn Evil. London: Rider.
Žižek, S. 2004. “Between Two Deaths: The Culture of Torture.” London Review of Books, June 3.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Jeffrey C. Alexander, Dominik Bartmański, and Bernhard Giesen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Binder, W. (2012). The Emergence of Iconic Depth: Secular Icons in a Comparative Perspective. In: Alexander, J.C., Bartmański, D., Giesen, B. (eds) Iconic Power. Cultural Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137012869_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137012869_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34262-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01286-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)