Skip to main content

Body and Image

  • Chapter
Iconic Power

Part of the book series: Cultural Sociology ((CULTSOC))

Abstract

The discourses of media and body are usually separate, but media and bodies themselves unite in the experience of images. This anthropological constellation of image, medium, and body is expanded with a fourth factor when we introduce the concept of the gaze. Images emerge only in the act of looking. But then we have to understand looking as the carrier of our entire knowledge about images (Bildwissen). Gazes are the accomplices of bodies that engage with old and new visual media. They are as active as the gazing subject itself. We are used to thinking of gaze and image as separate, and therefore we speak of looking at an image. The present paper, however, develops the idea that images form in adapting the gaze. The complicity between body and gaze leads to the image. This is the reason why the “gaze” is such a frequent topic of many visual media. According to the iconology of the gaze (Belting 2005a: 50–58), the act of looking is not only attracted by images but is also displayed in them, as if images had a faculty of looking themselves or could reciprocate our looks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Augé, M. 1997. La guerre des reves: Exercises d’ethno-fiction. Paris: Editions du Seuil. Translated by L. Heran as The War of Dreams: Exercises in Ethno-Fiction (London; Sterling, VA: Pluto Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann-Medick, D. 2006. Cultural Turns: Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften [New orientations in the cultural sciences]. Reinbek: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Enzyklopädie Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belting, H. 1997. “Über Lügen und andere Wahrheiten der Malerei” [About lies and other truths of painting]. In Sigmar Polke: Die drei Lügen der Malerei [Sigmar Polke: the three lies of painting], edited by Kunst-und Ausstellungshalle der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 140–42. Berlin: Cantz.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. “The Theatre of Illusion.” In Theaters, edited by H. Sugimoto, 1–7. New York: Sonnabend Sundell Editions:.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. Bild-Anthropologie: Entwürfe für eine Bildwissenschaft [Anthropology of the image: essays for a science of images]. 160. Munich: W. Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005a. “Zur Ikonologie des Blicks” [Iconology of the glance]. In Ikonologie des Performativen [Iconology of the performative], edited by C. Wulf and J. Zilfas, 50–58. Munich: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005b. “Image, Medium, Body: A New Approach to Iconology.“ Critical Inquiry 31: 302–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005c. Das echte Bild: Bildfragen als Glaubensfragen [The authentic image: image-questions as questions of faith]. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005d. “Toward an Anthropology of the Image.” In Anthropologies of Art, edited by M. Westermann, 41–58. Williamstown, MA: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, S., ed. 2006. Qu’est-ce qu’un corps? [What is a body?]. Paris: Musée de Quai Branly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Didi-Huberman, G. 1997. L’Empreinte [The imprint]. Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou Service Commercial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferino-Pagden, S., and L. Fornari Schianchi, eds. 2003. Parmigianino und der europäische Manierismus [Parmigianino and European mannerism]. Vienna: Kunsthistorisches Museum/Silvana Editoriale. Exhibition catalog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frontisi-Ducroux, F. 1997. “Narcisse et ses doubles” [Narcissus and his doubles]. In Dans l’oeil du miroir [In the eye of the mirror], edited by F. Frontisi-Ducroux and J.-P. Vernant. Paris: O. Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, P. 1996. The Pillow Book. Paris: Dis Voir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, O.W. 1859. “The Stereoscope and the Stereograph.” The Atlantic Monthly, June, 738–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, D. 2000. “Der Film als Bibliothek” [The movie as library]. Büchner: Monatszeitschrift für Kunst und Kultur 6: 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, C. 2003. Wozu Menschen malen: Historische Begründungen eines Bildmediums [For what reasons humans paint: foundations of an image medium]. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, B. 1998. Sound: Space. (Conversation with Wolfgang Pehnt). Ostfildern: Cantz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai, E., ed. 1987. Flämische Malerei von 1550 bis 1650 [Flemish painting from 1550 to 1650]. Cologne: Wallraf-Richartz-Museum, Bildhefte zur Sammlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary, B. 1993. La Photo sur la cheminée: Naissance d’un culte modern [The photograph on the chimney: the birth of a modern cult]. Paris: Diffusion Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Kalkus, R. 2001. Stimme und Sprechkünste im 20. Jahrhundert. [Voice and Arts of Speech in the Twentieth Century]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. T. 2005. What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. 2000. Le regard du portrait [The gaze of the portrait]. Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumeyer, A. 1964. Der Blick aus dem Bilde [The look out of the image]. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paik, N. J. 1976. “Input Time and Output Time.” In Video Art: An Anthology, edited by I. Schneider and B. Korot, 98–99. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedelijk Museum, ed. 1992. Sigmar Polke: Schilderijen. Translated by Ruth Koenig. Amsterdam: Stedelijk Museum. Exhibition catalog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. 1996. “L’image discrete” [The discrete image]. In Echographies de la télévision: entretiens filmés Echographies of the television: filmed interviews], edited by J. Derrida and B. Stiegler, 160–83. Paris: Galilée: Institut national de l’autovisuel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoichita, V. I. 1997. A Short History of the Shadow. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. “Der Quijote-Effekt” [The Quijote effect]. In Die Trauben des Zeuxis: Formen künstlerischer Wirklichkeitsaneignung [The grapes of Zeuxis: forms of artistic appropriation of reality], edited by H. Körner. Hildesheim and New York: G. Olms Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarkovsky, A. 1988. Hoffmaniana: Scénario pour un film non realize. Munich: Schirmer/Mosel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theye, T. 1989. Der geraubte Schatten: Photographie als ethnographisches Dokument [The stolen shadow: photography as ethnographic document]. Munich: Münchner Stadtmuseum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jeffrey C. Alexander Dominik Bartmański Bernhard Giesen

Copyright information

© 2012 Jeffrey C. Alexander, Dominik Bartmański, and Bernhard Giesen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belting, H. (2012). Body and Image. In: Alexander, J.C., Bartmański, D., Giesen, B. (eds) Iconic Power. Cultural Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137012869_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics