Abstract
Analysis of the interrelationships of the face, the mask and the Thing cannot ignore the Double. This is because doubling – be it explicit and horrific, or implicit and simply uncanny – questions the self’s self- presentation. If the same face can occupy two positions, logically speaking – except in a string theory multiverse – one suggests a mask. The self may fear lest its other, othered form be viewed as disclosing what lies within, and respond by ascribing this supernumerary face to an imposter. Thus Marilyn Johns Blackwell can use the words ‘double’ and ‘mask’ interchangeably, remarking, apropos Persona, that ‘[t]he double or the mask is, of course, a reflection or imitation, and often a covertly parodistic imitation that exposes hidden aspects of the original’. But doubling does not just ‘impart dynamism to the stasis of the world represented’ (Blackwell, 1986, p. 3).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Paul Coates
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coates, P. (2012). Masks and Metaphor: Doubles and Animals. In: Screening the Face. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137012289_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137012289_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33465-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01228-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)