Advertisement

Revisiting Arthur Schlesinger’s The Imperial Presidency: Richard Nixon, George W. Bush, and Executive Power

  • Jon Herbert
Chapter
  • 253 Downloads
Part of the The Evolving American Presidency Series book series (EAP)

Abstract

The Imperial Presidency is widely recognized as one of the most important and influential books written on the American presidency. First published in 1973, it explained Watergate’s significance even before Richard Nixon had left office. In his best-selling work, eminent historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. (1917–2007) characterized the “third-rate burglary” of Democratic National Committee (DNC) offices as a peripheral element within a revolutionary project to undermine America’s constitutional democracy. In Schlesinger’s assessment, the main significance of the botched break-in was to highlight the threat of the imperial presidency. Regardless of Nixon’s fate, Schlesinger warned that this “imperial” entity would continue to endanger America’s constitutional system because the structural factors that underpinned its development remained in place. George W. Bush’s extensive assertions of presidential authority, which some analysts characterized as a “new imperial presidency,” appeared to fulfill this prediction.1 Yet, the matter of causation remains open. Did the structural forces that Schlesinger identified as driving the original version also impel development of the new imperial presidency? This chapter examines his thesis and assesses its continued applicability regarding early twenty-first-century assertions of enhanced executive authority.

Keywords

Bush Administration Central Intelligence Agency Executive Power Enemy Combatant Trouble Asset Relief Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Examples include Andrew Rudalevige, The New Imperial Presidency: Renewing Presidential Power after Watergate (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 1.
    Peter Irons, War Powers: How the Imperial Presidency Hijacked the Constitution (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2005)Google Scholar
  3. 1.
    Charlie Savage, Takeover: The Return of the Imperial Presidency and the Subversion of American Democracy (Boston: Little, Brown, 2007).Google Scholar
  4. 2.
    Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Age of Jackson (Boston: Little, Brown, 1945), The Age of Roosevelt, 3 vols. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1957–1960), and A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965).Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    For autobiographical detail, see Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., A Life in the Twentieth Century: Innocent Beginnings, 1917–1950 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001), and Journals: 1952–2000 (New York: Penguin, 2007).Google Scholar
  6. 2.
    For insightful assessments, see John P. Diggins and Michael Lind, The Liberal Persuasion: Arthur Schlesinger Jr. and the Challenge of the American Past (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
  7. 2.
    Daniel Teller, “Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.,” in Robert A. Rutland, Clio’s Favorites: Leading Historians of the United States, 1945–2000 (Columbus: University of Missouri Press, 2000), 156–169.Google Scholar
  8. 3.
    Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Imperial Presidency (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1973), ix.Google Scholar
  9. 4.
    Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Bitter Heritage: Vietnam and American Democracy 1961–1968, rev. ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1968).Google Scholar
  10. 5.
    Andrew Rudalevige, “George W. Bush and the Imperial Presidency,” in Mark J. Rozell and Gleaves Whitney, eds., Testing the Limits: George W. Bush and the Imperial Presidency (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2009), 244.Google Scholar
  11. 7.
    Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., War and the American Presidency (New York: Norton, 2005), 45.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Hugh Heclo, “OMB and the Presidency—The Problem of Neutral Competence,” Public Interest 38 (Winter 1975), 87.Google Scholar
  13. 22.
    On this concept, see Theodore Lowi, The Personal President: Power Invested, Promise Unfulfilled (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
  14. 25.
    For similar critiques, see: James David Barber, The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House, (New York: Prentice Hall, 1972)Google Scholar
  15. 25.
    Bruce Mazlish, In Search of Nixon: A Psychohistorical Inquiry (New York: Basic Books, 1972).Google Scholar
  16. 29.
    Mazlish, In Search of Nixon; Anthony Summers, The Arrogance of Power: The Secret World of Richard Nixon (New York: Viking, 2000).Google Scholar
  17. 30.
    Stanley Kutler, The Wars of Watergate: The Last Crisis of Richard Nixon (New York: Norton, 1990)Google Scholar
  18. 30.
    Keith Olson, Watergate: The Presidential Scandal That Shook America (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2003), 168–75.Google Scholar
  19. 31.
    Joan Hoff, Nixon Reconsidered (New York: Basic Books, 1994) 341.Google Scholar
  20. 34.
    Joel Aberbach, “Supplying The Defect of Better Motives?: The Bush II Administration and the Constitutional System,” in Colin Campbell, Bert Rockman, and Andrew Rudalevige, eds., The George W. Bush Legacy (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2008), 121–122.Google Scholar
  21. 36.
    In May 1971 the administration organized the arrest of several thousand members of the People’s Coalition, a radical antiwar group that was intent on shutting down Washington through a week of civil disobedience actions, and detained them in ways that violated their constitutional rights, for which it was later fined. See Melvin Small, Johnson, Nixon, and the Doves (Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1988), 217.Google Scholar
  22. 37.
    James P. Pfiffner, Power Play: The Bush Presidency and the Constitution (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008), chapter 5.Google Scholar
  23. 38.
    James P. Pfiffner, Torture as Public Policy: Restoring U.S. Credibility on the World Stage (Boulder, CO: Paradigm, 2010)Google Scholar
  24. 39.
    Richard P. Nathan, The Plot That Failed: Nixon and the Administrative Presidency (New York: Wiley, 1975).Google Scholar
  25. 41.
    John C. Yoo, The Powers of War and Peace (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), viiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 41.
    Christopher S. Yoo, Steven G. Calabresi, and Anthony J. Colangelo, “The Unitary Executive in the Modern Era: 1945–2004,” Iowa Law Review, 90:2 (2005), 601–731.Google Scholar
  27. 42.
    Aberbach, “Supplying The Defect of Better Motives?,” 116–120; Phillip J. Cooper, “George W. Bush, Edgar Allan Poe, and the Use and Abuse of the Presidential Signing Statements,” Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35 (September 2005), 515–532; T.J. Halstead, “Presidential Signing Statements: Constitutional and Institutional Implications,” Congressional Research Service Report RL33667, www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33667.pdf., September 17, 2007; Government Accountability Office, “Presidential Signing Statements Accompanying The Fiscal Year 2006 Appropriations Acts,” June 18, 2007, www.gao.gov/decisions/appro/308603.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 43.
    Joel D. Aberbach, “The Political Significance of the George W. Bush Administration,” Social Policy and Administration, 39 (April 2005), 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 44.
    Joel Brinkley, “Out of Spotlight, Bush Overhauls US Regulations,” New York Times, August 14, 2004.Google Scholar
  30. 45.
    Curtis W. Copeland, “Statement to Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law of the House Judiciary Committee, 2008,” cited in House Committee on the Judiciary Majority Staff Report to Chairman John Conyers, Jr., Reining in the Imperial Presidency: Lessons and Recommendations Relating to the Presidency of George W. Bush, January 13, 2009, http://judi-ciary.house.gov/hearings.Google Scholar
  31. 46.
    Aberbach, “The Political Significance of the George W. Bush Administration,” 142–143; Amy E. Black, Of Little Faith: The Politics of George W. Bush’s Faith-Based Initiatives (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
  32. 47.
    Kenneth R. Mayer, With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power (Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002), 223.Google Scholar
  33. 48.
    Eric Lichtblau, “Prosecutor’s 2006 Firings Won’t Result In Charges,” New York Times, July 21, 2010.Google Scholar
  34. 51.
    Interview with Richard A. Clarke, 60 Minutes (CBS Television broadcast, March 21, 2004), www.cbsnews.com/stories.Google Scholar
  35. 52.
    For discussion of military and Medicare cost manipulations, see Iwan Morgan, The Age of Deficits: Presidents and Unbalanced Budgets from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2009), chapter 7.Google Scholar
  36. 54.
    Joe Wilson, “What I Didn’t Find in Iraq,” New York Times, July 6, 2003Google Scholar
  37. 54.
    Valerie Plame-Wilson, Fair Game: My Life as a Spy, My Betrayal by the White House (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007).Google Scholar
  38. 54.
    For brief review, see Clodagh Harrington, “The Ethical Record of the Bush Presidency,” in Iwan Morgan and Philip Davies, eds., Assessing George W. Bush’s Legacy: The Right Man? (New York: Palgrave, 2010), 110–13.Google Scholar
  39. 57.
    Gary C. Jacobson, A Divider, Not a Uniter: George W. Bush and the American People (London: Pearson Longman, 2006)Google Scholar
  40. 57.
    Sarah A. Binder, “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–96,” American Political Science Review, 93 (September 1999), 519–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 57.
    John Owens, “American-Style Party Government: Delivering Bush’s Agenda, Delivering Congress’s Agenda,” in Iwan Morgan and Philip Davies, eds., Right On? Political Change and Continuity in George W. Bush’s America (London: Institute for the Study of the Americas, 2006), 131–160.Google Scholar
  42. 58.
    Matthew A. Baum and Samuel Kernell, “Has Cable Ended The Golden Age of Presidential Television?” American Political Science Review, 93 (March 1999), 99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 58.
    George C. Edwards III, On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  44. 59.
    James L. Sundquist, The Decline and Resurgence of Congress (Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  45. 61.
    George W. Bush, “Remarks on the American Auto Industry,” December 19, 2008, in John Woolley and Gerhard Peters, The American Presidency Project (Santa Barbara: University of California), www.presidency.uscb.edu.Google Scholar
  46. 63.
    David A. Crockett, The Opposition Presidency: Leadership and the Constraints of History (College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  47. 64.
    Jonathan Mahler, “After the Imperial Presidency,” New York Times, November 9, 2008.Google Scholar
  48. 65.
    Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein, The Broken Branch: Why Congress Is Failing America and How To Get It Back On Track (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006); Owens, “Bush’s Congressional Legacy and Congress’s Bush Legacy.”Google Scholar
  49. 66.
    Jonathan Weisman, “Liberals Relent on Iraq War Spending,” Washington Post, March 23, 2007Google Scholar
  50. 66.
    David Stout and Sheryl Gay Stolberg, “Citing ‘Rigid’ Deadline, Bush Vetoes Iraq Bill,” New York Times, May 2, 2007; Morgan, The Age of Deficits, 240–244.Google Scholar
  51. 68.
    “From The Editors: The Times and Iraq,” New York Times, May 26, 2004; Floward Kurtz, “The Post on WMDs: An Inside Story,” Washington Post, August 12, 2004.Google Scholar
  52. 69.
    Ryan Lizza, “The White House Doesn’t Need The Press,” New York Times Magazine, December 9, 2001Google Scholar
  53. 69.
    John Anthony Maltese, “Communication Strategies in the Bush White House,” in Andrew Wroe and Jon Herbert, eds., Assessing the George W. Bush Presidency (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009), 216–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 70.
    G. Calvin MacKenzie, “Old Wars, New Wars and the American Presidency,” in George C. Edwards III and Philip John Davies, eds., New Challenges for the American Presidency (London: Pearson Longman, 2004), 208.Google Scholar
  55. 74.
    Lydia Saad, “Americans Reject Extreme Anti-Privacy Security Measures,” August 8, 2005, http://gallup.com; CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll, Dec. 16–18, 2005; www.pollingreport.com.Google Scholar
  56. 75.
    Lydia Saad, “Public Opinion Mixed On Bush Anti-Terrorism Agenda,” September 21, 2006, http://gallup.com; CBS News Polls, February 22–26 and May 16–17, 2006, both www.pollingreport.com; CBS Polls particularly revealed the suggestibility of the US public: two-thirds majorities consistently opposed the monitoring of “ordinary Americans” but monitoring of “Americans that the government is suspicious of” was approved by a similar proportion of the public. A narrow majority disapproved of wiretaps without warrants, but mention of terrorism in the question reversed the narrow margin.Google Scholar
  57. 76.
    Frank Newport, “Americans’ Complex Take on the Interrogation Debate,” April 27, 2009, http://www.gallup.com.Google Scholar
  58. 79.
    William G. Howell, Power Without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
  59. 79.
    William G. Howell and Jon G. Pevehouse, While Dangers Gather: Congressional Check on Presidential War Powers (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 81.
    Gordon Silverstein, “The Law: Bush, Cheney and The Separation of Powers: A Lasting Legacy?,” Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39 (December 2009), 878–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Michael A. Genovese and Iwan W. Morgan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Herbert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations