Skip to main content

Resurrections of the Living and the Dead: Natural and Spiritual Bodies and Souls

  • Chapter
Wonder in Shakespeare
  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

Is Prospero a hazy approximation of a Christ figure? Scholars have debated this question vigorously, without coming to a definitive conclusion. Prospero certainly behaves in a deeply Christian way at the end of the play when he opts to forgive those who have wronged him. The key statement he makes when he decides to forgive his oppressors and conspirators links the rhetoric of wonder to that of Christian forgiveness: “The rarer action is/In virtue than in vengeance” (5.1.27-28). Prospero’s turn toward forgiveness at the end of the play when all of his enemies are in his power is “rare” on several fronts. Prospero shows considerable vindictiveness throughout the play, so it comes as something of a surprise given his prior behavior; it is unusual in human interactions to forgive those who wrong us; it is a surprise to those familiar with Shakespeare’s fondness for the revenge tragedy tradition; and it is generically unnecessary within the comic tradition since villains are punished even in comedies such as The Merchant of Venice and Twelfth Night. Here the usurping brother and his diabolical conspirator both avoid retribution, and this represents a wondrous and rare reversal at the end of the play.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Beatrice Groves, Texts and Traditions: Religion in Shakespeare 1594–1604 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 21. Annabel Patterson has discussed the ways in which censorship provided linguistic and thematic opportunities for early modern authors. See Annabel Patterson, Censorship and Interpretation: The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Annabel Patterson, Censorship and Interpretation: The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. In-text citations refer to the following early version of the Bible: The Geneva Bible: Facsimile Edition of 1560, ed. Lloyd E. Berry (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saint Augustine, The City of God, Book 22, Chapter 5, trans. John Healey (London: George Eld, 1610), 879.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Saint Augustine, Faith and the Creed, in Saint Augustine, Earlier Writings, trans. John H. S. Burleigh (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1953), 368.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saint Augustine, Enchiridion, in Saint Augustine, Confessions and Enchiridion, trans, and ed. Albert C. Outler (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1955), 392–93. Augustine’s most extensive discussion of the nature of bodily resurrection occurs in the final book of The City of God, where he takes up a host of challenges to the doctrine by Platonists and others and considers some of the logistical questions surrounding resurrection such as whether the body will rise with all the hair and all the fingernails that have ever grown on it and what will become of bodies that have been eaten by beasts or cannibalized.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Athenagoras, Embassy for the Christians: The Resurrection of the Dead, trans. Joseph Hugh Crehan, S. J. (Westminster, MD: The Newman Press, 1956), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas Aquinas, Saint, Opusc. XIII, Compendium Theologiae, 151, in Saint Thomas Aquinas, Philosophical Texts, ed. and trans. Thomas Gilby (London: Oxford University Press, 1951), 278.

    Google Scholar 

  9. George England and Alfred W Pollard, eds., The Towneley Plays (London: The Early English Text Society, 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richard Beadle, ed., The York Plays (London: Edward Arnold, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tudor Royal Proclamations, ed. Paul L. Hughes and James F. Larkin (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964–9), 2:115. For more on the popularity and importance of biblically based dramas, see Groves, Texts and Traditions, 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Acts of the Privy Council of England, AD 1589–90, ed. John Roche Dasent (London: His Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1890–1964), 18:215.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. K. Chambers, The Elizabethan Stage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1923), 4:338–39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaara L. Peterson, “Shakespearean Revivifications: Early Modern Undead,” Shakespeare Studies 32 (2004): 240–66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Sadler, The Sick Woman’s Private Looking-glasse (London, 1636), 62–3, in ibid., 246.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Qtd in Gamini Salgado, ed., Eyewitnesses of Shakespeare: First Hand Accounts of Performances 1590–1890 (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1975), 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Adam Max Cohen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, A.M. (2012). Resurrections of the Living and the Dead: Natural and Spiritual Bodies and Souls. In: Wonder in Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011626_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics