Abstract
The characters in L’’Ami de mon amie (1987), the final film of Eric Rohmer’s Comédies et proverbes, live in Cergy-Pointoise, one of France’s New Towns, planned urban developments designed to accommodate population booms outside of Paris. In the film’s opening scenes, Blanche (Emmanuelle Chaulet), a young woman who works for the cultural affairs arm of the local city hall, meets Léa (Sophie Renoir), a student of computer sciences, in a cafeteria. A few days after their first meeting, the two women spend an evening at Blanche’s apartment in a well-known, visually striking residential building of Cergy-Pointoise: the Belvedere St. Christophe.1 When the fictional Blanche occupies this actual building, it is, like the town itself, very new; only a handful of residents walk about the building’s extensive grounds, and the landscaping has not appeared. Like the town in which this film is set, this is a space, a residence, on the verge of completion. And like many of the settings in Rohmer’s films, those spaces in progress inhabited by the characters in L’’Ami de mon amie reflect and often determine their psyches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Eric Rohmer, The Taste for Beauty, trans. Carol Volk (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989), 19.
See Peter Brunette, “But Nothing Happened: The Everyday in French Postwar Cinema,” in The Art of the Everyday: The Quotidian in Postwar French Culture, ed. Lynn Gumpert (New York: NYU Press, 1997), 82. Brunette highlights this preference: “The New Wave stuck, above all, to this world, and found its center to be that primordial urban locus of the French everyday, Paris. The vast majority of New Wave films, firmly anchored in la capitale, revel in the kiosks, the cobblestoned streets, the cafés, the shops, the taxis of the metropolis, this center of French life that is, by extension of course, the center of the universe itself.” See also Fiona Handyside’s chapter in this volume, “Walking the City: Paris in the Films of Eric Rohmer.”
Eric Rohmer, L’Organisation de l’espace dans le Faust de Murnau (Paris: Petite bibliothèque des Cahiers du cinéma, 2000), 6–7. (All translations from this work are mine.)
C. G. Crisp, Eric Rohmer: Realist and Moralist (Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1988), 37. Crisp identifies a contradiction between spatial realism and spatial metaphor: “In his later films … settings begin to acquire a loaded metaphorical significance—a status as aesthetic symbols—which is at odds with their denotative function.” Crisp’s monograph links this and other elements to a contrast between Rohmer’s realism and his moralism.
Ewa Mazierska, “Road to authenticity and stability: Representations of holidays, relocation and movement in the films of Eric Rohmer,” Tourist Studies 2:3 (December 2002): 241.
Claude-Jean Philippe, Interview with Eric Rohmer, “Le cinéma des cinéastes.” France Culture, March 22, 1981. Included as part of the bonus materials in The Eric Rohmer Collection (DVD box set released by Arrow Films, UK).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Leah Anderst
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anderst, L. (2014). Rohmer’s Poetics of Placelessness. In: Anderst, L. (eds) The Films of Eric Rohmer. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011008_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011008_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43639-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01100-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)