Skip to main content

Conflict, Democratic Reform, and Big Business: Factors Shaping the Economic Elite’s Position for Change

  • Chapter
Secular State and Religious Society

Abstract

The September 12, 2010 referendum on the constitution brought among other issues, Turkish big business and its social, political, and economic position to the fore. While the referendum pitted the mildly Islamic Justice and Development Party (JDP) government of Tayyip Erdoğan, which sought to change the constitution of 1982, against the secularist state elite and Kemalist middle classes, who saw in the referendum another ploy to erode the power of the secular establishment, there was also much discussion on the position that large capital owners took. The reason their position and their main voluntary organization—the Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association (TÜSİAD)—became a center of attention during the referendum was because of the association’s decision to maintain a neutral stance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arat, Y. 1991. “Politics and Big Business: Janus-Faced Link to the State,” in Strong State and Economic Interest Groups: The Post-1989 Experience, edited by M. Heper. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartell, Ernest J., and Leigh A. Payne. 1995. Business and Democracy in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. M. 2002. “Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing,” Ps-Political Science & Politics 35 (4): 679–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, R. 1984. “Interest Group Politics in the Third-World,” Third World Quarterly 8 (2): 507–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buğra, A. 1994. State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buğra, A. 1998. “Class, Culture, and State: An Analysis of Interest Representation by Two Turkish Business Associations,” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 30: 521–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. 1998. “The Extended Case Method,” Sociological Theory 16 (1): 4–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cammett, M. 2007. Globalization and Business Politics in Arab North Africa: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, F. H. 1986. “Entrepreneurs and the transition to democracy in Brazil,” in Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, edited by G. O’Donnell, P. Schmitter and L. Whitehead. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Enzo Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, F. and E. Silva. 1998 Organized Business, Economic Change, and Democracy in Latin America. Coral Gables, FL: North-South Center Press at the University of Miami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. B. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter B., Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Theda Skocpol. 1985. Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. 2002. “Getting in the Door: Sampling and Completing Elite Interviews,” Ps-Political Science &Politics 35 (4): 669–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. 1985 Powers and Liberties: The Causes and Consequences of the Rise of the West. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heper, M. 1985. The State Tradition in Turkey. Beverley, North Humberside: Eothen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty; Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilkin, S. and Tekeli, I. 1982. Uygulamaya Gecerken Turkiye’ de Devletciligin Olusumu, Ankara: Orta Dogu Teknik Universitesi

    Google Scholar 

  • Insel, A. 1984. La Turquie entre l’ordre et le developpement: elements d’analyse sur le role de l’etat dans le processus de developpement, Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Informant 1. 2001. Personal interview, TÜSİAD member, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Informant 2. 2002. Personal interview, TÜSİAD member, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Informant 3. 2002. Personal interview, TÜSİAD member, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, I. 2007.“Identity Politics: The Struggle for Recognition or Hegemony?” East European Politics and Societies, 21: 704–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyder, Çaglar. 1987. State and Class in Turkey: A Study in Capitalist Development. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingstone, P. R. 1998. “Corporatism, Neoliberalism, and the Failed Revolt of Big Business: Lessons from the Case of IEDI,” Journal of Lnteramerican Studies and World Affairs 40 (4): 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koker, L. 1999. Modernlesme, Kemalizm ve Demokrasi, 4th ed. Istanbul: Đletisim Yayinlari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. 2007. “Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics,” Comparative Political Studies 40 (2): 122–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. 1997. “Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State?” Review Of International Political Economy 4: 472–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 2002. The Communist Manifesto. London and New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Barrington. 1967. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, P. 2004. Doing Business in the Middle East: Politics and Economic Crisis in Jordan and Kuwait. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, N. P. 1986. Politics in the Semi-periphery: Early Parliamentarism and Late Lndustrialization in the Balkans and Latin America. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, N. P. 1995. Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnosis and Remedies. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo A. 1979. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism; Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods andthe Theory of Groups. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öniş, Ziya and Umut Turem. 2002. “Entrepreneurs, democracy, and citizenship in Turkey,” Comparative Politics 34: 439–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, Nicos Ar. 1971. Pouvoir politique et classes sociales. Paris: F. Maspero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D., Huber Stephens, E. and Stephens, J. D. 1992. Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. R. 2002. “Why is Mexican Business so Organized?” Latin American Research Review Vol. 37, No. 1: 77–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. R. 2004. Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-century Latin America. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E. 1996. “From Dictatorship to Democracy—The Business-State Nexus in Chile’s Economic Transformation, 1975–1994,” Comparative Politics 28: 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E. and Francisco Durand. 1998. “Organized Business and Politics in Latin America,” in Durand and Silva (eds.) Organized Business, Economic Change, and Democracy in Latin America. Coral Gables, FL: North-South Center Press at the University of Miami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez, M. 1988. Turkiye’ de holdingler: kirk haramiler. Istanbul: Arkadas Yayinevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz, D. 2006. “Business as Usual? Turkish Industrialists, the State and Democratization.” PhD Thesis. McGill University: Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz, D. 2010. “Testing Large Business’s Commitment to Democracy: Business Organizations and the Secular—Muslim Conflict in Turkey,” Government and Opposition 45 (1), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz, E. 1994. “The State of the Industrial Workforce, 1923–1940,” in D. Quataert and E. Zürcher (eds.) Workers andthe Working Class in the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic 1839–1950. London and New York: Tauris Academic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Berna Turam

Copyright information

© 2012 Berna Turam

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yavuz, D. (2012). Conflict, Democratic Reform, and Big Business: Factors Shaping the Economic Elite’s Position for Change. In: Turam, B. (eds) Secular State and Religious Society. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137010643_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics