Advertisement

“A Sharper Reproof to These Degenerate Effeminate Days”

  • Jennifer Feather
Chapter
  • 48 Downloads
Part of the Early Modern Cultural Studies book series (EMCSS)

Abstract

The previous chapter claims that while Vesalius presents a notion of body and self drawn from the classical tradition that ensures agent autonomy through objectification of the body either of the opponent or the corpse, his English imitators and Shakespeare’s Roman plays, influenced by a medieval English tradition, present a form of agency that understands combat as mutually constructive for both combatants and agency as relational. Vesalius’s depiction of the body begins to suggest the role violent, physical opposition plays in the construction of individual understandings of self. To elucidate how this process extends to the development of an English national sense of self, this chapter examines historical narratives, and especially moments when masculine codes of combat are appropriated by women, that illuminate the cultural differences at stake in these different modes of understanding combat in relationship to the self.

Keywords

Early Modern Period Female Suicide English Writer Roman Model Roman Republic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Thomas Nashe, The Works of Thomas Nashe, ed. Ronald B. McKerrow (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958), 1:212.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carolyn Williams, Boudica and Her Stories: Narrative Transformations of a Warrior Queen (Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press, 2009), esp. 44–55.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Jean Howard and Phyllis Rackin, Engendering a Nation: A Feminist Account of Shakespeare’s English Histories (New York: Routledge, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ania Loomba, Shakespeare, Race, and Colonialism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Mary Floyd-Wilson, English Ethnicity and Race in Early Modern Drama (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Thomas Elyot, A Critical Edition of Sir Thomas Elyot’s ‘The Boke Named the Govenour’” ed. Donald W. Rude (New York: Garland Publishing, 1992), esp. 226–36.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    Annabel Patterson, Reading Holinshed’s Chronicles (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994), 104–5.Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Thomas Laqueuer, Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  9. Anthony Fletcher, Gender, Sex, and Subordination 1500–1800 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  10. Laura Levine, Men in Women’s Clothing: Anti-theatricality and Effeminization, 1579–1642 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  11. Christian Billings, Masculinity, Corporality, and the English Stage 1580–1635 (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    Ann Rosalind Jones and Peter Stallybrass, Renaissance Clothing and the Materials of Memory (New York: Cambridge UP, 2000), esp. 71–2.Google Scholar
  13. 23.
    Marie Axton, The Queen’s Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession (London: Royal Historical Society, 1977), 12.Google Scholar
  14. 29.
    Simone Weil, The Iliad Or The Poem of Force, (Wallingford, PA: Pendle Hill, 1956).Google Scholar
  15. Elaine Scarry, The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  16. Susan Brison, Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of the Self (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  17. Richard Sugg, Murder After Death: Literature and Anatomy in Early Modern England (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
  18. David Hillman, Shakespeare’s Entrails: Belief, Scepticism, and the Interior of the Body (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).Google Scholar
  19. 34.
    Coppelia Kahn, Roman Shakespeare (New York: Routledge, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 42.
    Igor Djordjevic, Holinshed’s Nation: Ideals, Memory, and Practical Policy in the (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010), 22–3.Google Scholar
  21. 43.
    Lister M. Matheson, The Prose Brut: The Development of a Middle English Chronicle (Tempe, AZ: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1998).Google Scholar
  22. 44.
    Fred Jacob Levy, Tudor Historical Thought (San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1967), 287.Google Scholar
  23. 48.
    Andrew Hadfield, Shakespeare, Spenser, and the Matter of Britain (New York: Palgrave, 2004), esp. 92.Google Scholar
  24. 54.
    William Ian Miller, The Mystery of Courage (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), 19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jennifer Feather 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Feather

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations