Skip to main content

Not Just the Warm, Fuzzy Feeling You Get from Buying Free-Range Eggs …

  • Chapter
Greening Citizenship
  • 143 Accesses

Abstract

In the 1980s and 1990s, political parties began to enunciate new discourses in their appeals to citizens. In short, across the postindustrial states, the major parties began in earnest to place modernist concerns with self-realization at the centre of their public representations and, eventually, their social policies. Indeed, where the normalizing of the subpolitics of risk helped to cement new institutional arrangements of citizenship in horizontal governance networks, what was regarded at the time as a ‘new’ form of Third Way politics, ostensibly steering a course ‘between’ Left and Right, brought with it new types of social and political participation and new ‘stakeholder’ citizenship rights and duties. My point is that, although differing in important ways across different states, the major parties began in the 1990s to underplay appeals to citizens as the bearers of ‘liberal’ civil and political rights and duties and especially ‘social’ rights and duties in relation to the welfare state. Rather, the major parties took up new calls to ‘stakeholder’ citizens as the bearers of rights to wellbeing and security from risk and duties to be independent in relation to opportunities to participate in society. Later in this chapter, I look more closely at three examples of contemporary social practice — corporate social and environmental responsibility, green consumerism and the political use of liveability indices — and find that the new citizenship is indeed premised upon a holistic cultural ideology, as well as non-contractualism, non-territorialism, the dissolution of the public-private split and ethico-moral awareness of environmental problems such as risk or, even, ecospace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example, S. Jenkins, Thatcher and Sons: A Revolution in Three Acts (London: Penguin Books, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Sassoon, One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century (London: I.B. Tauris, 2010);

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Olsen, M. Koss, and D. Hough, ‘From Pariahs to Players? Left Parties in National Governments’, in Left Parties in National Governments, ed. J. Olsen, M. Koss, and D. Hough (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010);

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Frank, What’s the Matter with Kansas? (New York: Vintage Books, 2004);

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Hamilton, ‘What’s Left? The Death of Social Democracy’, Quarterly Essay, no. 21 (2006). J.C. Alexander, The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. 2. See S. Buckler and D.P. Dolowitz, ‘Theorizing the Third Way: New Labour and Social Justice’, Journal of Political Ideologies 5, no. 3 (2000); H. Dean, ‘Popular Discourse and the Ethical Deficiency of “Third Way” Conceptions of Citizenship’, Citizenship Studies 8, no. 1 (2004); A. Giddens, The Third Way (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998); J. Clarke, ‘New Labour’s Citizens: Activated, Empowered, Responsibilized, Abandoned?’, Critical Social Policy 25, no. 4 (2005); B. Burkitt and F. Ashton, ‘The Birth of the Stakeholder Society’, Critical Social Policy 16, no. 49 (1996);

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Giddens, ‘The Politics of Climate Change: National Responses to the Challenge of Global Warming’ (London: Policy Network, 2008);

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Giddens, The Politics of Climate Change (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Callinicos, Equality, Themes for the 21st Century (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Prabhakar, ‘Stakeholding: Does It Possess a Stable Core?’, Journal of Political Ideologies 8, no. 3 (2003): 347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Turner, ‘Shifting the Frame from Nation-State to Global Market’, Social Analysis 46, no. 2 (2002): 56, 68–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Kelly, D. Kelly, and A. Gamble. Stakeholder Capitalism (London: Macmillan, 1997), 44, 228.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Supiot, ‘Law and Labour: A World Market of Norms?’, New Left Review I, no. 39 (2006): 109, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Boles, Which Way’s Up: The Future for Coalition Britain and How to Get There (London: Biteback Publishers, 2010), 9; Prime Minister’s Off ice, ‘Government Launches ‘Big Society’ Programme’, Office of the Prime Minister, http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/topstorynews/2010/05/big-society-50248; P. Totaro, ‘Britain Surprises with Carbon Plan’, The Age, May 21 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Dumont, German Ideology: From France to Germany and Back (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1994 [1991]), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Alston, ed., Labour Rights as Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005);

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Deakin and F. Wilkinson, The Law of the Market: Industrialization, Employment, and Legal Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Freedland, The Personal Employment Contract (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003). P. Dwyer, ‘Conditional Citizens? Welfare Rights and Responsibilities in the Late 1990s’, Critical Social Policy 18, no. 4 (1998); Handler, ‘Reforming/Deforming Welfare’; P. Harris, ‘From Relief to Mutual Obligation: Welfare Rationalities and Unemployment in 20th-Century Australia’, Journal of Sociology 37, no. 1 (2001); Jessop, ‘The Changing Governance of Welfare: Recent Trends In Its Primary Functions, Scale and Modes of Coordination’; R. Sainsbury, ‘21st Century Welfare — Getting Closer to Radial Benefit Reform’, Public Policy Research 17, no. 2 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Rosanvallon, The New Social Question: Rethinking the Welfare State (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000 [1995]), 211.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Zimmerman, ‘Pragmatism and the Capability Approach: Challenges in Social Theory and Empirical Research’, European Journal of Social Theory 9, no. 4 (2006): 468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van Steenbergen, ‘Towards a Global Ecological Citizen’, 47, 143–4; B.S. Turner, ‘The Erosion of Citizenship’, British Journal of Sociology 52, no. 2 (2001): 199.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Martinez-Alier, The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002), 5–10.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Barry, ‘Ecological Modernization’, in Debating the Earth, ed. J.S. Dryzsek and D. Schlosberg (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 311.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.S. Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 143;

    Google Scholar 

  25. —, Politics of the Earth, 2nd ed . (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 167;

    Google Scholar 

  26. also, J. S. Dryzek et al., Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Norway (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Elkington, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom-Line of 21st Century Business (Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 1997);

    Google Scholar 

  28. —, The Chrysalis Economy (Oxford: Capstone Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Salmon, La Tentation Éthique Du Capitalisme (Paris: La Découverte 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  30. —, Moraliser Le Capitalisme (Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fiona Haddock, ‘Socially Responsible Companies: Corporate Angels’, Global Finance 13, no. 12 (1999): 24, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Atkinson, ‘Measuring Corporate Sustainability’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43, no. 2 (2000): 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gilding, P. (2002) Single Bottom Line Sustainability, The Sydney Papers, no volume given: 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See, for example, A. Lagan, ‘a Revolution to Find Value in Common Ground’, Australian Financial Review, 29 May 2003, 23; S. Zuboff, ‘Evolving: A Call to Action’, Fast Company Social Capitalists Issue, no. 78 (2004): 97; R. Kelly, ‘Community Values Create Value’, Business Review Weekly, 16 January 2003, 447; C. Juniper and M. Moore, ‘Synergies and Best Practices of Corporate Partnerships for Sustainability’, Corporate Environmental Strategy 9, no. 3 (2002), 267–9;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. R.P. Hill and D.L. Stephens, ‘The Compassionate Organisation in the 21st Century’, Organizational Dynamics 32, no. 4 (2003); 331–41;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Benioff and K. Southwick, Compassionate Capitalism: How Corporations Can Make Doing Good an Integral Part of Doing Well (New York: Career Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  37. W. Lazonick and M. O’Sullivan, ‘Maximizing Shareholder Value: A New Ideology for Corporate Governance’, Economy and Society 29, no. 1 (2000); C. Stoney and D. Winstanley, ‘Stakeholding: Confusion or Utopia? Mapping the Conceptual Terrain’, Journal of Management Studies 38, no. 5 (2001): 608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. See A. Scerri, ‘Paradoxes of Increased Individuation and Public Awareness of Environmental Issues’, Environmental Politics 18, no. 4 (2009): 476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. T.P. Lyon and J.W. Maxwell, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and the Environment: A Theoretical Perspective’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2, no. 2 (2008): 252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. P.R. Portney, ‘The (Not So) New Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Perspective’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2, no. 2 (2008): 262, italics in original.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. See M.L. Parry et al., eds., Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  42. A.P.J. Mol and G. Spaargaren, ‘Environment, Modernity and the Risk-Society’, International Sociology 8, no. 4 (1993): 357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. M. Schudson, ‘The Troubling Equivalence of Citizen and Consumer’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 608 (2006): 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. G. Spaargaren, and A.P.J. Mol, ‘Greening Global Consumption: Redefining Politics and Authority’, Global Environmental Change 18, no. 2 (2008): 358, emphasis added.

    Google Scholar 

  45. E.F. Isin, ‘The Neurotic Citizen’, Citizenship Studies 8, no. 3 (2004): 226; Mol and Spaargaren, ‘Environment, Modernity and the Risk-Society’ 443–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. K. Hobson, ‘Bins, Bulbs and Shower Timers: On the “Techno-Ethics” of Sustainable Living’, Ethics, Place & Environment 9, no. 3 (2006): 321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. —, ‘Thinking Habits into Action: The Role of Knowledge and Process in Questioning Household Consumption Practices’ Local Environment $18, no. 1 (2003): 95–112, 110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. V. Timmer and N-K Seymoar, ‘Vancouver Working Group Discussion Paper’, in The World Urban Forum 2006 (Vancouver: UN Habitat — International Centre for Sustainable Cities, 2005);

    Google Scholar 

  49. National Endowment for the Arts, The NEA 1965–2000: A Brief Chronology of Federal Support for the Arts (Washington DC: NEA, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  50. R. Veenhoven, ‘Happiness as an Indicator in Social Policy Evaluation: Some Objections Considered’, in Between Sociology and Sociological Practice, ed. K. Mesman Schultz et al. (Nijmegen: Institute for Applied Social Sciences, 1993); R. Veenhoven and J. Ehrhardt, ‘The Cross-National Pattern of Happiness: Test of Predictions Implied in Three Theories of Happiness’, Social Indicators Research 34, no. 1 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  51. F. Fischer, Democracy & Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. See, for example, N. Casey, ‘Melbourne Benchmarking and Liveability’ (Melbourne: City of Melbourne, 2009);

    Google Scholar 

  53. —, ‘Melbourne City Research: International City Comparisons’ (Melbourne: City of Melbourne, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  54. A. Desrosières, ‘Historiciser L’action Publique: L’Etat, Le Marche Et Les Statistiques’, in Historicites de l’action publique, ed. P. Laborier and D. Trom (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003); P. Le Galès and A. Scott, ‘Une Revolution Bureaucratique Britannique? Autonomie Sans Controle Ou “Freer Markets, More Rules”’, Revue Française de Sociologie 49, no. 2 (2008); W. Espeland and M. Sauder, ‘Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds’, American Journal of Sociology 113, no. 1 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Andy Scerri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scerri, A. (2012). Not Just the Warm, Fuzzy Feeling You Get from Buying Free-Range Eggs …. In: Greening Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137010315_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics