Advertisement

Challenging Modern Artificialism

  • Andy Scerri

Abstract

By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the unprecedented expansion of industrial production increased the importance to social reproduction of manufacturing workers as a social class. Increased global inter-state competition for markets and resources, as well as concerns over military security, created a sense of urgency around questions of working and social conditions in general. The state and economy required a compromise that would secure industrial and political peace. Meanwhile, the working class itself began to organize with the aim of achieving ‘full’ citizenship rights, up to and including a just share of the profits of industrial development. It is in this context that a socialistic critique of industrial society and the social claims of citizenship were pushed to the centre of the political sphere. If we once more pick up the critical pragmatists’ line of argument, what becomes apparent in conditions of industrialization is a shift in the way that political compromise over the social bond is enframed. The bourgeois citizenship-based conceptions of freedom, equality and autonomy that had been central to the mercantile state were, with the expansion of industrialization, partially eclipsed by the emergence of cultural and political tensions over the redistribution of economic wealth amongst formally free, equal and autonomous citizens.

Keywords

Welfare State Institutional Arrangement Social Bond Shadow Economy Political Sphere 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    B.S. Turner, ‘Citizenship Studies: A General Theory’, Citizenship Studies 1, no. 1 (1997): 5–18;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. B.S. Turner and C. Rojek, Society and Culture: Principles of Scarcity and Solidarity (London: Sage, 2001).Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    E.P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (London: Penguin Books, 1980 [1963]).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    T.H. Marshall, ‘Citizenship and Social Class’, in The Citizenship Debates: A Reader, ed. G. Shafir (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998 [1950]), 46.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    M. Gauchet, ‘Democratic Pacification and Civic Desertion’, Thesis Eleven 29 (1991): 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    J. Valdivielso, ‘Social Citizenship and the Environment’, Environmental Politics 14, no. 2 (2005): 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 8.
    B.S. Turner, ‘The Erosion of Citizenship’, British Journal of Sociology 52, no. 2 (2001): 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 9.
    A. Giddens, The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies, ed. P.S. Cohen, Sociology (London: Hutchinson & Co. Ltd, 1974), 286.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    See N. Fraser, in N. Fraser and A. Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, trans. J. Golb, J. Ingram, and C. Wilke (London: Verso Books, 2003), 80, 106.Google Scholar
  10. Fraser refers to a similar point, made by G. Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Brenner, The Boom and The Bubble, 2nd ed. (London: Verso, 2005).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Sklair, ‘Sociology of the Global System’, in The Globalization Reader, ed. F.J. Lechner and J. Boli (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005 [2002]), 74.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Boltanski and L. Thévenot, On Justification: Economies of Worth, ed. P. DiMaggio et al., trans. C. Porter, Princeton Studies in Cultural Sociology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006 [1991]), 374.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Lears, Fables of Abundance (New York: Harper Collins Publishing, 1994), 345;Google Scholar
  15. see also —, ‘Reconsidering Abundance: A Plea for Ambiguity’, in Getting and Spending, ed. S. Strasser et al. (Washington, DC: German Historical Institute, 1998), 457–8.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    See R. Behr, ‘Anti-Consumerism: New Frontier or Dead End for Progressive Politics?’, Public Policy Research 17, no. 2 (2010): 124; M. Featherstone, ‘Automobilities: Introduction to the Special Edition’, Theory, Culture & Society 21, no. 4/5 (2004); M. Hilton, ‘Consumers and the State Since the Second World War’, ANNALS 611 (2007);Google Scholar
  17. A. Offer, The Challenge of Affluence: Self-Control and Well-Being in the United States and Britain since 1950 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006);Google Scholar
  18. K.T. Jackson, Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985); J. Urry, ‘The “System” of Automobility’, Theory, Culture & Society 21, no. 4/5 (2004).Google Scholar
  19. 16.
    M. Featherstone, Consumer Culture and Postmodernism, ed. M. Featherstone, 2nd ed., Theory, Culture & Society (London: Sage Publishers, 1996), 35;Google Scholar
  20. D. Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Oxford: Blackwell Books, 1990).Google Scholar
  21. 17.
    G. Schulze, ‘From Situations to Subjects: Moral Discourse in Transition’, in Constructing the New Consumer Society, ed. P. Sulkunen et al. (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1997), 43.Google Scholar
  22. 19.
    See J.K. Galbraith, The Affluent Society (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1958).Google Scholar
  23. 20.
    J. Baudrillard, For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign, trans. C Levin (St. Louis: Telos Press, 1981 [1972]), 29–33, 88–90.Google Scholar
  24. 22.
    I. Blühdorn, Post-ecologist Politics: Social theory and the Abdication of the Ecologist Paradigm (London: Routledge, 2000);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. R. Inglehart, The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977);Google Scholar
  26. —, Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990);Google Scholar
  27. —, Modernization and Postmodernization (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997);Google Scholar
  28. T. Roszak, The Making of a Counterculture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society & Its Youthful Opposition, 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995 [1968]);Google Scholar
  29. C. Lasch, Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged (New York: Basic Books, 1977);Google Scholar
  30. —, The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in An Age of Diminishing Expectations (New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1979).Google Scholar
  31. 23.
    See R. Dunlap and G.A. Mertig, ‘Global Concern for the Environment: Is Affluence a Prerequisite?’, Journal of Social Issues 51, no. 3 (1995); —, ‘Global Environmental Concern: An Anomaly for Postmaterialism’, Social Science Quarterly 78, no. 1 (1997); J. Martinez-Alier, The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 24.
    D. Bell, The End of Ideology (New York: Glencoe Free Press, 1960);Google Scholar
  33. —, The Coming of Postindustrial Society (New York: Basic Books, 1973);Google Scholar
  34. —, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, 2nd ed. (London: Heinemann Books, 1978), 198.Google Scholar
  35. 28.
    M. Crozier, S.P. Huntington, and J. Watanuki, The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission (New York: NYU Press, 1975);Google Scholar
  36. I. Kristol ‘Keeping Up with Ourselves’, in The End of Ideology, ed. C.I. Waxman (New York: Funk & Wagnalls, [2006] 1968).Google Scholar
  37. 31.
    J. Habermas, Legitimation Crisis, trans. T. McCarthy (Boston Beacon Press, 1975 [1973]), 123–4, Italics in original.Google Scholar
  38. See also, P. Bachrach, The Theory of Democratic Elitism (London: University of London Press, Ltd., 1967), 5–6, 8–9, 103.Google Scholar
  39. 32.
    J. Habermas, Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, trans. J.J. Shapiro (London: Heinemann, 1971 [1968]), 110, italics in original.Google Scholar
  40. 33.
    See, for example, Giddens, The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies, 61–3, 85, 257. Z. Bauman, Work, Consumerism and the New Poor (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1998); —, ‘The Poor — and the Rest of Us’, Arena New Series, no. 12 (1998);Google Scholar
  41. M. Peel, The Lowest Rung: Voices of Australia’s Poverty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004),Google Scholar
  42. Z. Bauman, ‘Social Issues of Law and Order’, British Journal of Criminology 40 (2000): 207. R. Brenner, ‘New Boom or New Bubble?’, New Left Review II, no. 25 (2004); G. Duménil and D. Lévy, ‘Neoliberal Income Trends’, New Left Review II, no. 30 (2004); Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, 330–5;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. K. Eder, The New Politics of Class: Social Movements and Cultural Dynamics in Advanced Societies (London: Sage, 1993).Google Scholar
  44. 34.
    J.S. Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 95.Google Scholar
  45. 35.
    Habermas, Legitimation Crisis; C. Offe, Contradictions of the Welfare State (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984);Google Scholar
  46. J. O’Connor, The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: Transaction Books, 2009 [1973]);Google Scholar
  47. —, Accumulation Crisis (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar
  48. 36.
    J. Heath, Efficient Society: Why Canada Is as Close to Utopia as It Gets (Toronto: Penguin Global, 2005);Google Scholar
  49. J. Heath and A. Potter, Rebel Sell: Why the Culture Can’t Be Jammed (New York: HarperBusiness, 2004).Google Scholar
  50. 38.
    P. Rosanvallon, The New Social Question: Rethinking the Welfare State (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000 [1995]), 49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andy Scerri 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andy Scerri

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations