Abstract
‘Socially immature, lacking mutual respect and having led self-indulgent, materialistic lives, they are all too easily shocked by the close confines of military life.’1 This verdict on the calibre of British Army recruits was the result of a research project entitled ‘Culture Shock and the British Infantry Recruit’, published in 2006. The study found that recruits were ‘increasingly self-absorbed and undisciplined’ and that ‘they come from backgrounds that have suffered from the decline of the traditional family’. Leaving school ‘without any set of moral values’, many young men were simply unable to cope with military life and were failing as a result. The report concluded that recruit training centres were ‘sites of cultural collisions, between the infantry, with a clear focus on the task and the team, and a civil society that is increasingly focused on image and the individual’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Richard Norton-Taylor, ‘Two thirds of teenagers too fat to be soldiers’, Guardian, Friday 3 November 2006. http://goo.gl/UOTm7 (accessed 18 February 2011).
See, for example, Keith Ajegbo, Dina Kiwan & Seema Sharma, Diversity and Citizenship. A Curriculum Review, DfES Publication, Nottingham, 2007.
P. A. J. Waddington, ‘Police (Canteen) Sub-culture: an appreciation’, British Journal of Criminology, 39 (2), 1999, pp. 287–309.
Anthony King, ‘The Word of Command: Communication and Cohesion in the Military’, Armed Forces & Society, 32 (4), 2006, 493–512, p. 493.
See also Robert J. MacCoun, Elizabeth Kier, Aaron Belkin, ‘Does Social Cohesion Determine Motivation in Combat? An Old Question with an Old Answer’, Armed Forces & Society, 32 (4), 2006, pp. 646–654.
Guy L. Siebold, ‘The Essence of Military Group Cohesion’, Armed Forces & Society, 33 (2), 2007, pp. 286–295.
Charles Kirke, ‘Group Cohesion, Culture, and Practice’, Armed Forces & Society 35, 2009, p. 745.
David Mason and Christopher Dandeker, ‘Evolving UK Policy on Diversity in the Armed Services: Multiculturalism and its Discontents’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 47 (4), November 2009, 393–410, p. 403.
Timothy Edmunds and Anthony Forster, Out of Step: The Case for Change in the British Armed Forces, London: Demos, 2007.
Gordon Brown, ‘Who do we want to be? The future of Britishness’, speech delivered at the Fabian New Year Conference, Imperial College, London, Saturday 14 January 2006. http://goo.gl/7xMV5 (accessed 16 November 2011).
Alex Alexandrou and Roger Darby, ‘Human Resource Management’, in Laura R. Cleary and Teri McConville, eds. Managing Defence in a Democracy, London: Routledge, 2006, p. 157.
See Rachel Woodward’s essay arguing this same point: R. Woodward, ‘Not for Queen and Country or any of that shit…’: reflections on citizenship and military participation in contemporary British soldier narratives’, in Gilbert, E. and Cowan, D. (Eds) War, Citizenship, Territory. Routledge, London, 2008, pp. 363–384.
Hugh Gusterson, ‘The Cultural Turn in the War on Terror’, in John D. Kelly, Beatrice Jauregui, Sean T. Mitchell, and Jeremy Walton, Eds, Anthropology and Global Counterinsurgency, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010, 280.
David Kilcullen, ‘Twenty-Eight Articles: Fundamentals of Company-level Counterinsurgency’, Edition 1, March 2006. http://goo.gl/VsIoY (accessed 6 November 2011).
Julia Preston, ‘The US military will offer path to citizenship’, New York Times, February 4, 2009. http://goo.gl/3vTK3 (8 August 2011).
David H. Price, Weaponizing Anthropology: Social Science in the Service of the Militarized State, Oakland: AK Press, 2011.
Christopher Leake, ‘Afghan refugees on £200 a day — to pose as Taliban’, Daily Mail, 14 July 2007. http://goo.gl/YxtNl (accessed 6 May 2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Vron Ware
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ware, V. (2012). Culture Shock. In: Military Migrants. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137010032_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137010032_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43624-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01003-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)