Skip to main content

Culture Shock

  • Chapter
Military Migrants

Part of the book series: Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series ((MDC))

  • 294 Accesses

Abstract

‘Socially immature, lacking mutual respect and having led self-indulgent, materialistic lives, they are all too easily shocked by the close confines of military life.’1 This verdict on the calibre of British Army recruits was the result of a research project entitled ‘Culture Shock and the British Infantry Recruit’, published in 2006. The study found that recruits were ‘increasingly self-absorbed and undisciplined’ and that ‘they come from backgrounds that have suffered from the decline of the traditional family’. Leaving school ‘without any set of moral values’, many young men were simply unable to cope with military life and were failing as a result. The report concluded that recruit training centres were ‘sites of cultural collisions, between the infantry, with a clear focus on the task and the team, and a civil society that is increasingly focused on image and the individual’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Richard Norton-Taylor, ‘Two thirds of teenagers too fat to be soldiers’, Guardian, Friday 3 November 2006. http://goo.gl/UOTm7 (accessed 18 February 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, Keith Ajegbo, Dina Kiwan & Seema Sharma, Diversity and Citizenship. A Curriculum Review, DfES Publication, Nottingham, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. A. J. Waddington, ‘Police (Canteen) Sub-culture: an appreciation’, British Journal of Criminology, 39 (2), 1999, pp. 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anthony King, ‘The Word of Command: Communication and Cohesion in the Military’, Armed Forces & Society, 32 (4), 2006, 493–512, p. 493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. See also Robert J. MacCoun, Elizabeth Kier, Aaron Belkin, ‘Does Social Cohesion Determine Motivation in Combat? An Old Question with an Old Answer’, Armed Forces & Society, 32 (4), 2006, pp. 646–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guy L. Siebold, ‘The Essence of Military Group Cohesion’, Armed Forces & Society, 33 (2), 2007, pp. 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charles Kirke, ‘Group Cohesion, Culture, and Practice’, Armed Forces & Society 35, 2009, p. 745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. David Mason and Christopher Dandeker, ‘Evolving UK Policy on Diversity in the Armed Services: Multiculturalism and its Discontents’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 47 (4), November 2009, 393–410, p. 403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Timothy Edmunds and Anthony Forster, Out of Step: The Case for Change in the British Armed Forces, London: Demos, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon Brown, ‘Who do we want to be? The future of Britishness’, speech delivered at the Fabian New Year Conference, Imperial College, London, Saturday 14 January 2006. http://goo.gl/7xMV5 (accessed 16 November 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alex Alexandrou and Roger Darby, ‘Human Resource Management’, in Laura R. Cleary and Teri McConville, eds. Managing Defence in a Democracy, London: Routledge, 2006, p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Rachel Woodward’s essay arguing this same point: R. Woodward, ‘Not for Queen and Country or any of that shit…’: reflections on citizenship and military participation in contemporary British soldier narratives’, in Gilbert, E. and Cowan, D. (Eds) War, Citizenship, Territory. Routledge, London, 2008, pp. 363–384.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hugh Gusterson, ‘The Cultural Turn in the War on Terror’, in John D. Kelly, Beatrice Jauregui, Sean T. Mitchell, and Jeremy Walton, Eds, Anthropology and Global Counterinsurgency, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010, 280.

    Google Scholar 

  14. David Kilcullen, ‘Twenty-Eight Articles: Fundamentals of Company-level Counterinsurgency’, Edition 1, March 2006. http://goo.gl/VsIoY (accessed 6 November 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Julia Preston, ‘The US military will offer path to citizenship’, New York Times, February 4, 2009. http://goo.gl/3vTK3 (8 August 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. David H. Price, Weaponizing Anthropology: Social Science in the Service of the Militarized State, Oakland: AK Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Christopher Leake, ‘Afghan refugees on £200 a day — to pose as Taliban’, Daily Mail, 14 July 2007. http://goo.gl/YxtNl (accessed 6 May 2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Vron Ware

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ware, V. (2012). Culture Shock. In: Military Migrants. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137010032_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics