Abstract
According to an important tradition that has been passed down through many centuries, only truth-conducive epistemic desiderata such as reliability, evidence, safety considerations, and the like determine whether or not s’s true belief that p amounts to knowledge that p.1 This tradition has recently been named “intellectualism” and it is the reigning orthodoxy in contemporary analytic epistemology.2 Orthodoxies tend to travel in packs. What would original sin be without substitutionary atonement? Trickle-down economics without widespread income disparity?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Aaron Rizzieri
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rizzieri, A. (2013). Breaking with Orthodoxy: Encroachment and the Bank Cases. In: Pragmatic Encroachment, Religious Belief, and Practice. Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009418_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009418_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43603-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00941-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)