Abstract
The Government of India made certain choices regarding four deadly infectious diseases, and for several reasons, the health of colonial subjects rarely entered into discussions of infectious disease policy at the central level. The Government of India’s approach to health policy was largely instrumental, considering international and domestic political relationships and economic impact primarily and the well-being of Indians only secondarily, if at all. To understand why the government adopted this approach, it is necessary to look beyond a metropole-colony dialectic and examine how international health organizations and policies influenced and were influenced by governments and health officials in India and to understand the role that state perceptions of risk played in health policy decisions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Tony Ballantyne, ‘Empire, Knowledge and Culture: From Proto-Globalization to Modern Globalization’, Globalization in World History, A. G. Hopkins (ed.) (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2002).
Tony Ballantyne, Orientalism and Race: Aryanism in the British Empire (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), pp. 3, 15.
Douglas Haynes, Imperial Medicine: Patrick Manson and the Conquest of Tropical Disease (Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001), p. 48.
Richard H. Grove, Green Imperialism: Colonial, Expansion, Tropical Island Edens, and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Cf. I. J. Catanach, ‘Plague and the Tensions of Empire: India 1896–1918’, Imperial Medicine and Indigenous Societies, David Arnold (ed.) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988).
Cf. Dorothy Porter, Health, Civilization and the State: A History of Public Health from Ancient to Modern Times (London: Routledge, 1999).
Neville M. Goodman, International Health Organizations and Their Work (Philadelphia: The Blakiston Company, 1952), pp. 101–2. J. C. Coyajee, India and the League of Nations (Madras: Waltair, 1932), pp. 165–8.
Sunil S. Amrith, Decolonizing International Health: India and Southeast Asia, 1930–65 (Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), pp. 7–8.
P. K. Manning, ‘Managing Risk: Managing Uncertainty in the British Nuclear Installations Inspectorate’, Law and Policy, 11.3 (1989): 351.
Cf. Lee Clarke and James F. Short, Jr. ‘Social Organization and Risk: Some Current Controversies’, Annual Review of Sociology, 19 (1993): 375–99.
Niklas Luhmann, Risk: A Sociological Theory (New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction, 2002), pp. 2–3.
Norman Howard-Jones, The Scientific Background of the International Sanitary Conferences, 1851–1938 (Geneva: World Health Organization, 1975), p. 76.
See Peter Baldwin, Contagion and the State in Europe, 1830–1930 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) for his discussion of geoepidemiological trajectories.
Claire Hooker, ‘Sanitary Failure and Risk: Pasteurisation, Immunisation and the Logics of Prevention’, Contagion: Epidemics, History and Culture from Smallpox to Anthrax, Alison Bashford and Claire Hooker (eds) (Annandale: Pluto Press Australia, 2002 [2001]), pp. 144–5.
Valeska Huber, ‘The Unification of the Globe by Disease? The International Sanitary Conferences on Cholera, 1851–1894’, Historical Journal, 49.2 (2006): 467.
David P. Fidler, ‘The Globalization of Public Health: The First 100 Years of International Health Diplomacy’, World Health Organization, 79 (2001): 847.
Cf. Richard Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
Edward Hallett Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939 (London: Macmillan & Co., 1954), p. 97. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977), p. 139.
Alexandra Minna Stern and Howard Markel, ‘International Efforts to Control Infectious Diseases, 1851 to the Present’, JAMA, 292 (2004): 1474, 1478.
Louis Henkin argues that nations have a tendency to comply. Only if ‘violation promises an important balance of advantage over cost’ will nations disregard or violate international obligations. Louis Henkin, How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979), pp. 49–50, 58.
Alison Bashford, “The Age of Universal Contagion”: History, Disease and Globalization’, Medicine at the Border: Disease, Globalization and Security, 1850 to the Present, Alison Bashford (ed.) (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), pp. 5–6.
Dean T. Jamison, ‘Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Concepts and Applications’, Oxford Textbook of Public Health, Roger Detels et al. (eds), vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 906.
P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins, British Imperialism, 1688–2000 (Harlow: Longman, 2002), p. 278.
Arabinda Samanta, Malarial Fever in Colonial Bengal, 1820–1939: Social History of an Epidemic (Kolkata: Firma KLM, 2002), p. 204.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002), pp. 76–7.
Mark Harrison, Public Health in British India: Anglo-Indian Preventive Medicine, 1859–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 149, 200.
Roger Jeffery, The Politics of Health in India (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), p. 101.
Frank M. Snowden, The Conquest of Malaria: Italy, 1900–1962 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006), pp. 215–18.
David Washbrook, ‘The Rhetoric of Democracy and Development in Late Colonial India’, Nationalism, Democracy, and Development, Sugata Bose and Ayesha Jalal (eds) (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 44–5.
V. R. Muraleedharan, ‘Malady in Madras: The Colonial Government’s Response to Malaria in the Early Twentieth Century’, Science and Empire: Essays in India Context (1700–1947), Deepak Kumar (ed.) (Delhi: Anamika Prakashan, 1991), pp. 110–11.
Judith M. Brown, ‘Imperial Facade: Some Constraints upon and Contradictions in the British Position in India, 1919–35’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society series 5, 26 (1976): 44, 51.
Deepak Kumar, ‘Perceptions of Public Health: A Study in British India’, Maladies, Preventives and Curatives: Debates in Public Health in India, Amiya Kumar Bagchi and Krishna Soman (eds) (Kolkata: Tulika Books, 2005), p. 49.
British Social Hygiene Council, Empire Social Hygiene Year-Book, 1937 (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1937), p. 408.
Sheila Jasanoff, ‘Beyond Calculation: A Democratic Response to Risk’, Disaster and the Politics of Intervention, Andrew Lakoff (ed.) (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010), p. 29.
Uday Singh Mehta, Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999), pp. 190–1.
Thomas R. Metcalf, Ideologies of the Raj (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 43.
Partha Chatterjee, The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).
Cf. David Arnold, Colonizing the Body: State Medicine and Epidemic Disease in Nineteenth-Century India (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).
Sumit Guha, Health and Population in South Asia: From Earliest Times to the Present (London: Hurst, 2001), p. 158.
Chittabrata Palit, Scientific Bengal: Science, Technology, Medicine and Environment under the Raj (Delhi: Kalpaz Publications, 2006), p. 179.
Margaret Jones, Health Policy in Britain’s Model Colony: Ceylon (1900–1948) (New Delhi: Orient Longman, 2004), p. 151.
Copyright information
© 2012 Sandhya L. Polu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Polu, S.L. (2012). Disease as Prism. In: Infectious Disease in India, 1892–1940. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009326_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009326_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34657-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00932-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)